Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 6:30 PM
To: Kavanagh, Mark B
Cc: Dey, Souvik ; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; dev at
dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio
I think current patch is fine. If someone has later problem
Hi Stephen/Liu,
Any other comments or suggestions for this. If the below patch looks
fine then please do suggest the next steps .
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dey, Souvik
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 10:05 AM
this looks good or we have few more comments.
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Kavanagh, Mark B [mailto:mark.b.kavan...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 4:16 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com;
stephen at networkplumber.org
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subj
Hi All,
Is there any further comments or modifications required for this patch,
or what next steps do you guys suggest here ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Dey, Souvik
Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2016 10:09 AM
To: mark.b.kavanagh at intel.com; yuanhan.liu
Hi Liu/Stephen/Mark,
I have submitted Version 7 of this patch. Do let me know if this looks
proper.
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Dey, Souvik
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 4:32 PM
To: mark.b.kavanagh at intel.com; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; stephen
Hi Mark/Liu,
I know this might be a redundant question, but should I put your names
in the Reviewed-by section in v5 ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Kavanagh, Mark B [mailto:mark.b.kavan...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 8:16 AM
To: Dey, Souvik
Hi Mark/Liu,
Is there any further comments to the below patch ? Should I submit it
as v5 of the patch ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dey, Souvik
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 11:12 AM
To: Kavanagh, Mark B
-Original Message-
From: Kavanagh, Mark B [mailto:mark.b.kavan...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 10:48 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; Yuanhan Liu
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stephen at networkplumber.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4]net/virtio: add mtu set in virtio
>
>Hi Ma
Hi All,
Any further comments or updates to be made in the below patch else I
will go ahead a submit the v5 for the same.
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dey, Souvik
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 2:16 PM
To: Kavanagh
intel.com]
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 11:44 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; Yuanhan Liu
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stephen at networkplumber.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4]net/virtio: add mtu set in virtio
>
>Hi Mark,
>
>Yes I thought I did that change. Sorry once again.. making too many mistake
io_dev_stats_get,
--
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Kavanagh, Mark B [mailto:mark.b.kavan...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 11:05 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; Yuanhan Liu
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stephen at networkplumber.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4]net/virtio: add mtu set in
et,
.stats_get = virtio_dev_stats_get,
--
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 3:00 AM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stephen at networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4]net/virtio: add mtu set
Hi,
I have having an unique issue to get the VLAN tags upto the VM
instance running ixgbevf pmd. Currently my setup looks like this :
Host running 7.1 RHEL , linux 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 with 10G 82599ES NIC cards
with firmware : 0x8838 and ixgbe driver version 4.0.1-k-rh7.1
: Thursday, September 8, 2016 3:57 AM
To: Maxime Coquelin
Cc: Dey, Souvik ; stephen at networkplumber.org;
huawei.xie at intel.com; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] add mtu set in virtio
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:50:34AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
>
> On 09/08/2016
Hi Liu,
Submitted the version 4 of the patch as you suggested , and have
removed the Reviewed by line.
I have still kept the function definition as to follow the same suit as we have
done for other eth_dev_ops.
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Dey, Souvik
Sent
Ok thanks understood. I will submit v4 for this.
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 11:54 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stephen at networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3]virtio:add mtu set
Ok will change it. Do I need to submit a new v4 for that ? can I put your name
also in the reviewed by list?
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 11:43 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stephen
recommend to submit an updated version or this is fine ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 11:38 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stephen at networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH
: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 3:06 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; stephen at networkplumber.org
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] add mtu set in virtio
Hi Souvik,
On 09/02/2016 12:20 AM, Dey, Souvik wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
-Original Message-
From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 3:58 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; stephen at networkplumber.org;
huawei.xie at intel.com; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] add mtu set
Yes this patch definitely solves my issue too.
-Original Message-
From: Mcnamara, John [mailto:john.mcnam...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 7:00 AM
To: Mussar, Gary ; Dey, Souvik ;
Stephen Hemminger
Cc: nhorman at tuxdriver.com; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev
o_sys_path))
else:
device["Interface"] = ""
# check if a port is used for ssh connection
-Original Message-
From: Mussar, Gary [mailto:gmus...@ciena.com]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 11:10 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; Stephen Hemminger
Cc: nhorman at tuxdriver
the first time can you please guide with the
next steps.
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: huawei.xie at intel.com; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; dev at dpdk
Saturday, August 27, 2016 8:16 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: huawei.xie at intel.com; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] add mtu set in virtio
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:54:28 -0400
souvikdey33 wrote:
> This functionality is required mostly in the clou
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: nhorman at tuxdriver.com; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] dpdk-devbind.py: Virtio interface issue.
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 22:25:46 -0400
souvikdey33 wrote:
> +#The path for virtio devices are different. Get the correct path.
> + virtio = "/
ut Dpdk. Any other
suggestions ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Wenzhuo [mailto:wenzhuo...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 8:33 PM
To: Dey, Souvik ; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: RE: VLAN with ixgbevf pmd
Hi Souvik,
Take testpmd for example, normally we
Hi,
I am trying to get tagged packets to work in SRIOV mode. I am using dpdk 2.1
version with an application on KVM.
The setup is as below: The same configuration works for untagged packets.
Guest VM (Virtual Function/Created tagged kni interfaces)--- > KVM host (PF/no
tag on the VF )
So is there no resolution to this issue ?
-Original Message-
From: Tan, Jianfeng [mailto:jianfeng@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 2:18 PM
To: Dey, Souvik ; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: RE: tx_burst errors seen with virtual pmds
Hi Souvik,
> -Original Mess
Hi All,
While trying call load with virtio_pmd/vmxnet3_pmd , I am
seeing that at around 100Mbps, we are having tx_burst errors. We are currently
using DPDK 2.1 and send 1 packet at a time. When we try the same with ixgbe_vf
we are not seeing similar drops. Is there any issues
this issue ?
-Original Message-
From: Yong Wang [mailto:yongw...@vmware.com]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 11:57 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Vmxnet3 activation of device fails in DPDK1.7
nb_rx_desc should be less or equal to 2048 in update 3 due to a change
, December 11, 2015 12:07 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Vmxnet3 activation of device fails in DPDK1.7
On 12/10/15, 2:22 AM, "dev on behalf of Dey, Souvik" wrote:
>Hi,
>In DPDK 1.7 , while using the vmxnet3 pmd on vmware Esxi 5.
Hi,
In DPDK 1.7 , while using the vmxnet3 pmd on vmware Esxi 5.5
update 3 we are seeing that activation of the device fails.
status = VMXNET3_READ_BAR1_REG(hw, VMXNET3_REG_CMD); return a non zero status.
Though the normal vmxnet3.ko works fine in the same system. Any idea if
Hi,
Is there any particular reason of nor supporting the
RTE_PCI_DRV_INTR_LSC for vmxnet3. I can see we have introduced the same for the
other virtual driver virtio but not for vmxnet3. Do we have some technical
difficulties there ? Can someone throw some light on this.
--
Hi All,
I am currently facing a weird issue where I am not able to bind
the virtio_pci device to igb_uio in DPDK1.7 on QEMU/KVM. I can see there are
two fold issues.
1.The pci_unbind.py script where the virt_path is removed from 1.6 to 1.7
version due to which the initial status
Hi All,
We have a single primary application with multiple secondary
applications launched on the same cpu core. When the system boots up for the
first time ,the primary comes up followed by the secondary process everything
works fine. But in between if I try to restart the
Thanks got your point then we should be changing this in DPDK also as in 1.8 we
are using netif_rx in rte_kni.c.
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhor...@tuxdriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 5:51 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev
Do you see any benefit of calling netif_rx_ni() and not directly netif_rx() ?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhor...@tuxdriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 4:16 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Kernel deadlock due to rte_kni
On Wed, Mar
Hi All,
There looks like an issue will rte_kni.ko which gets kernel
into deadlock. We are trying to run rte_kni.ko with multiple thread support
which are pinned to different non-isolated cores. When we test with tcp/tls the
kernel is getting hanged in on race condition. Below is
Hi All,
I was trying out handling of jumbo packets in DPDK, but I came
across an issue where I see that the multiple segmented mbufs are not supported
in the rte_kni and due to which the packets are not properly handled/converted
to skb before giving it to the kernel. Is there
Hi,
Does the rte_kni kernel module support multi-segment mbufs ? If
not is there any plan to do so ? Also I see that the pmds are supporting jumbo
frames but if kni does not support multi-segment mbufs then how the jumbo
frames will be given up to the kernel ?
--
Regards,
Any plans to support this in future in DPDK fragmentation code ?
-Original Message-
From: Ananyev, Konstantin [mailto:konstantin.anan...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 5:49 PM
To: Dey, Souvik; Thomas Monjalon
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Patil, PraveenKumar
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev
...@6wind.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 4:54 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Patil, PraveenKumar
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] FW: BUG in IP FRAGMENTATION
ME TOO, I HAVE A BUG WITH CAPS LOCK ;)
2014-10-15 11:06, Dey, Souvik:
> In DPDK1.6 do we support overlapped fragments while do
Hi,
In DPDK1.6 do we support overlapped fragments while doing
reassembly. Also why we don't consider the first or last fragment to be
out-of-order. Are this known limitations in DPDK or they are not working due to
some bugs in the code ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
43 matches
Mail list logo
