Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Drill 1.5.0 RC3

2016-02-11 Thread Jacques Nadeau
Download, build, unit tests. Deploy on small cluster and verify operation of a few distributed queries. LGTM +1 (binding) -- Jacques Nadeau CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:18 PM, rahul challapalli < challapallira...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Built from source

[GitHub] drill pull request: DRILL-4383: Allow custom configurations to be ...

2016-02-11 Thread jacques-n
Github user jacques-n commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/375#issuecomment-183136555 lgtm --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] drill pull request: DRILL-4383: Allow custom configurations to be ...

2016-02-11 Thread jaltekruse
GitHub user jaltekruse opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/375 DRILL-4383: Allow custom configurations to be specified for a FileSys… …tem plugin You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/jaltekru

[jira] [Created] (DRILL-4383) Allow passign custom configuration options to a file system through the storage plugin config

2016-02-11 Thread Jason Altekruse (JIRA)
Jason Altekruse created DRILL-4383: -- Summary: Allow passign custom configuration options to a file system through the storage plugin config Key: DRILL-4383 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4383

[GitHub] drill pull request: DRILL-4363: Row count based pruning for parque...

2016-02-11 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/371 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl

[GitHub] drill pull request: DRILL-4363: Row count based pruning for parque...

2016-02-11 Thread amansinha100
Github user amansinha100 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/371#issuecomment-183125598 Updated patch looks good to me. +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Drill 1.5.0 RC3

2016-02-11 Thread rahul challapalli
+1 (non-binding) Built from source and ran the Functional and Advanced suites from the test framework. Performed some sanity tests against web ui authentication. On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Jason Altekruse wrote: > Thanks for the vote Sudheesh! > > Please, others with time available try ou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Drill 1.5.0 RC3

2016-02-11 Thread Jason Altekruse
Thanks for the vote Sudheesh! Please, others with time available try out the candidate, the vote is supposed to close tomorrow at 7PM Pacific. Thanks, Jason On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Sudheesh Katkam wrote: > +1 (non-binding; committer) > > * downloaded and built from source tar-ball; ra

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Drill 1.5.0 RC3

2016-02-11 Thread Sudheesh Katkam
+1 (non-binding; committer) * downloaded and built from source tar-ball; ran unit tests successfully on Ubuntu * ran simple queries (including cancellations) in embedded mode on Mac; verified states in web UI * ran simple queries (including cancellations) on a 3 node cluster; verified states in we

[GitHub] drill pull request: Drill 4260: Adding support for "some" custom f...

2016-02-11 Thread amansinha100
Github user amansinha100 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/340#issuecomment-183070887 +1. I gave a couple of comments; overall LGTM. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo

[GitHub] drill pull request: Drill 4260: Adding support for "some" custom f...

2016-02-11 Thread amansinha100
Github user amansinha100 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/340#discussion_r52672160 --- Diff: exec/java-exec/src/test/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/window/TestWindowFrame.java --- @@ -106,6 +106,60 @@ public void testMultipleF

[GitHub] drill pull request: DRILL-3623: Optimize limit 0 queries

2016-02-11 Thread StevenMPhillips
Github user StevenMPhillips commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/364#issuecomment-183008840 @hhsuanyi I did not open any calcite jira. The new calcite version was there from Sudheesh's commit which I pulled in. @sudheeshkatkam Does your update ha

Re: expected behavior when using wild cards in table name

2016-02-11 Thread Abdel Hakim Deneche
I guess I was mainly thinking about parquet tables created by Drill, in this case selecting a subset of the files wouldn't make sense, right ? On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Steven Phillips wrote: > I don't understand why they wouldn't be allowed. They seem perfectly valid. > > On Thu, Feb 11

Re: expected behavior when using wild cards in table name

2016-02-11 Thread Steven Phillips
I don't understand why they wouldn't be allowed. They seem perfectly valid. On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Abdel Hakim Deneche wrote: > I have the following table tpch100/lineitem that contains 97 parquet files: > > tpch100/lineitem/part-m-0.parquet > tpch100/lineitem/part-m-1.parquet

expected behavior when using wild cards in table name

2016-02-11 Thread Abdel Hakim Deneche
I have the following table tpch100/lineitem that contains 97 parquet files: tpch100/lineitem/part-m-0.parquet tpch100/lineitem/part-m-1.parquet tpch100/lineitem/part-m-2.parquet ... tpch100/lineitem/part-m-00096.parquet I can run the following queries: SELECT COUNT(*) FROM `tpch100/

[GitHub] drill pull request: DRILL-4091: Support for additional gis operati...

2016-02-11 Thread k255
Github user k255 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/258#issuecomment-182857803 Aggregate version of st_union allows merging geometries using 'group by' --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitH