Github user amansinha100 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/424#issuecomment-195140460
LGTM. +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user amansinha100 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/424#discussion_r55780247
--- Diff:
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/store/parquet/ParquetGroupScan.java
---
@@ -547,29 +559,72 @@ public long getRowCount() {
Github user amansinha100 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/407#issuecomment-195138369
Updated changes LGTM. +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user amansinha100 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/407#discussion_r55779800
--- Diff:
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/union/UnionAllRecordBatch.java
---
@@ -294,13 +313,41 @@ public UnionAllInput(
Done - Version in master branch updated to 1.7.0-SNAPSHOT
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Jacques Nadeau wrote:
> You want to roll forward the current branch to 1.7.0-SNAPSHOT so we can
> continue developing/merging stuff?
>
> --
> Jacques Nadeau
> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
>
>
>
You want to roll forward the current branch to 1.7.0-SNAPSHOT so we can
continue developing/merging stuff?
--
Jacques Nadeau
CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Parth Chandra wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've created the 1.6.0 branch and will be rolling out the first release
Hi guys,
I've created the 1.6.0 branch and will be rolling out the first release
candidate as soon as I get the go ahead from the QA team, in the next
couple of hours.
Thanks
Parth
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Parth Chandra
wrote:
> It is usually not a good idea to try to rush in a patc
It is usually not a good idea to try to rush in a patch at the last minute.
One of the reasons for having monthly releases is so people don't have to
wait too long for fixes and developers don't rush fixes in.
QA is almost done with their validation, so I'm afraid this might have to
go into the nex
thank you
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Jason Altekruse wrote:
> I hadn't actually tested out the patch, what I had said was that I could
> add a flag to make avro files behave like parquet and JSON, without schema
> validation. The patch made it so the behavior of directories would be
> diff
I hadn't actually tested out the patch, what I had said was that I could
add a flag to make avro files behave like parquet and JSON, without schema
validation. The patch made it so the behavior of directories would be
different from that of individual files, removing the schema validation. I
tried
Github user amansinha100 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/407#discussion_r55749381
--- Diff:
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/union/UnionAllRecordBatch.java
---
@@ -162,6 +162,25 @@ private IterOutcome do
Github user hsuanyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/423#discussion_r55730852
--- Diff:
exec/java-exec/src/test/java/org/apache/drill/exec/fn/impl/TestAggregateFunctions.java
---
@@ -460,4 +466,23 @@ public void testGroupBySystemFuncFil
GitHub user adeneche opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/424
Drill 4484: NPE when querying empty directory
this PR also includes the fix for DRILL-4376. I will rebase once that fix
has been merged into master
You can merge this pull request into a Git repos
Hi,
This issue is still unresolved:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4120
It would mean a great deal to us if it was.
The solution is, as I understood Jason and Jacques, ready and only needs to
be merged.
Regards,
-Stefán
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:50 AM, Parth Chandra wrote:
> Hi
You are correct, it was, sorry.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Abdel Hakim Deneche
wrote:
> Hey Stefán, I just left a comment in the JIRA. I think the issue is related
> to the double quotes.
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Stefán Baxter
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed that using th
Hey Stefán, I just left a comment in the JIRA. I think the issue is related
to the double quotes.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Stefán Baxter
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that using the IN operator with a sub structure has stopped
> working:
>
> select s.client_ip.ip from dfs.asa.`/processed/ve
Stefán Baxter created DRILL-4495:
Summary: IN operator does not work
Key: DRILL-4495
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4495
Project: Apache Drill
Issue Type: Bug
Comp
Hi,
I noticed that using the IN operator with a sub structure has stopped
working:
select s.client_ip.ip from dfs.asa.`/processed/venuepoint/transactions` as
s where s.client_ip.ip in ("unknown") limit 2;
Error: PARSE ERROR: Encountered "\"" at line 1, column 103.
Was expecting one of:
...
SQL Qu
18 matches
Mail list logo
