Re: [HANGOUT] Topics for 10/04/16

2016-10-06 Thread Laurent Goujon
For the PR I didn't squash the changes into one single commit to make it easier to review, but let me know if you would prefer the changes or pull requests organized differently to speed up the review... On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Parth Chandra wrote: > I see, so it

Re: [HANGOUT] Topics for 10/04/16

2016-10-06 Thread Parth Chandra
I see, so it is not the prepare query where we see the improvement. I didn't realise that the BI tools can make so many information schema queries. I haven't been able to go thru the PR in detail. There is extensive refactoring that always makes it hard to tell the exact changes. (Make me

Re: [HANGOUT] Topics for 10/04/16

2016-10-05 Thread Jacques Nadeau
-user (since this is really a dev discussion) Looking at DRILL-4280, I see the comment about C++ changes but don't see them there or in the linked squash branch. Maybe I'm missing something obvious? The key performance benefits from the provided patch are about all the other interrogations that

Re: [HANGOUT] Topics for 10/04/16

2016-10-05 Thread Parth Chandra
Yup. I agree that we need to make sure that both clients are in sync. I believe DRILL-4280's PR refers to making changes in both APIs as well. Do you have a sense of how these changes give us a performance boost? As far as I can see, the APIs result in nearly the same code path being executed,

Re: [HANGOUT] Topics for 10/04/16

2016-10-04 Thread Jacques Nadeau
Both the C++ and the JDBC changes are updates that leverage a number of pre-existing APIs already on the server. Our initial evaluations, we have already seen substantially improved BI tool performance with the proposed changes (with no additional server side changes). Are you seeing something

Re: [HANGOUT] Topics for 10/04/16

2016-10-04 Thread Sudheesh Katkam
Join us at this link: https://hangouts.google.com/hangouts/_/maprtech.com/drillbi-weeklyhangout > On Oct 3, 2016, at 9:26 PM, Shadi Khalifa wrote: > > Hi, > I have been working on integrating

Re: [HANGOUT] Topics for 10/04/16

2016-10-04 Thread Parth Chandra
Hi guys, I won't be able to join the hangout but it would be good to discuss the plan for the related backend changes. As I mentioned before I would like to see a concrete proposal for the backend that will accompany these changes. Without that, I feel there is no point to adding so much new

Re: [HANGOUT] Topics for 10/04/16

2016-10-03 Thread Shadi Khalifa
Hi, I have been working on integrating WEKA into Drill to support building and scoring classification models. I have been successful in supporting all WEKA classifiers and making them run in a distributed fashion over Drill 1.2. The classifier accuracy is not affected by running in a

Re: [HANGOUT] Topics for 10/04/16

2016-10-03 Thread Laurent Goujon
Hi, I'm currently working on improving metadata support for both the JDBC driver and the C++ connector, more specifically the following JIRAs: DRILL-4853: Update C++ protobuf source files DRILL-4420: Server-side metadata and prepared-statement support for C++ connector DRILL-4880: Support JDBC

Re: [HANGOUT] Topics for 10/04/16

2016-10-03 Thread Subbu Srinivasan
Can we close on https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/518 ? On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Sudheesh Katkam wrote: > Hi drillers, > > Our bi-weekly hangout is tomorrow (10/04/16, 10 AM PT). If you have any > suggestions for hangout topics, you can add them to this thread.

[HANGOUT] Topics for 10/04/16

2016-10-03 Thread Sudheesh Katkam
Hi drillers, Our bi-weekly hangout is tomorrow (10/04/16, 10 AM PT). If you have any suggestions for hangout topics, you can add them to this thread. We will also ask around at the beginning of the hangout for topics. Thank you, Sudheesh