Re: Flink Connector for Druid

2020-12-03 Thread Slim Bouguerra
Hi If my understanding is correct you are trying to read data in a parallel way from Historicals (keep in mind you might need to read real time data as well). In this case you can do something similar to the Hive Druid integration by using the Broker API

Re: ByteBuffer / Memory / Unsafe et al

2020-02-05 Thread Slim Bouguerra
ode there > yet > > > > (only a few aggregators implement VectorAggregator). So we will need > to > > > > write most of it for the first time, and since it is fresh code, I > > think > > > > it'd be nice to use the best API currently available in Java

Re: ByteBuffer / Memory / Unsafe et al

2020-02-05 Thread Slim Bouguerra
Hi Gian, Thanks for bringing this up. IMO for the long run and looking at how much code will have to change, it makes more sense to rely on JDK based API JEP 370 and have this work done ONCE as oppose to multiple iteration. FYI i do not think it is far away, seems like there is a good momentum

Re: [VOTE] Apache Druid graduation to top level project

2019-12-05 Thread Slim Bouguerra
> > > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project > > Management > > > > > > > > > > > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "The Apache Druid > > > > > Project", > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Druid graduation to top level project

2019-07-10 Thread Slim Bouguerra
gt; > > > > > The Apache Druid Project; and be it further > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > > > > > > > hereby are appointed to serve as the ini

Re: Graduation

2019-06-19 Thread Slim Bouguerra
Thanks Gian for taking the lead on this! On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:50 PM Himanshu wrote: > SGTM > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 6:16 PM Gian Merlino wrote: > > > I just read through that guide. It seems there is still some work to do, > > including updating our status file, etc. It doesn't look

Re: Graduation

2019-06-13 Thread Slim Bouguerra
+1 imo thanks for pushing this. On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 8:18 AM Abhishek Sharma wrote: > Hi All, > > +1, congrats. > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:01 PM 金嘉怡 wrote: > > > +1 Congratulations! > > > > On 2019/06/08 04:27:01, Gian Merlino wrote: > > > Hey Druids,> > > > > > > Druid has been in

Re: 0.14.2-incubating

2019-05-13 Thread Slim Bouguerra
gt; > definitely have additional stress testing planned (in fact we've > already > > > installed the 0.15.0-incubating branch in _our_ production environment > > and > > > have started to bang on it). The more of that we can get, the better, > > > especially

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.14.2 [RC1]

2019-05-13 Thread Slim Bouguerra
0 for me We have just released 0.14.0 and 0.14.1 and soon will be releasing 0.15.0, This release is effectively one bug fix that concerns one extension. IMO this is a read flag of unstable release that can hurt the project overall, we need to keep in mind that Druid is not a library but it is a

Re: 0.14.2-incubating

2019-05-10 Thread Slim Bouguerra
It sounds like we are doing release after release with out enough time to validate candidates, in the long run this might hurt adoption. On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 08:44 Gian Merlino wrote: > It sounds like a plan to me. > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 6:53 PM Clint Wylie wrote: > > > I know

Re: Would like to contribute to druid project

2019-04-26 Thread Slim Bouguerra
If you're looking for some starter projects, we maintain a list of issues suitable for new developers. https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Difficulty+-+Easy%22 On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 9:08 AM kirankumar D G wrote: > Hi, > > Please add me to the

Re: Off list major development

2019-01-03 Thread Slim Bouguerra
ssue with [Proposal] header like https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/issues/4349 is good to me, Thanks! > On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 10:28 AM Slim Bouguerra wrote: > > > Thanks everyone for interacting with this thread. > > > > The fact that i, Roman, Jihoon and others

Off list major development

2019-01-02 Thread Slim Bouguerra
Hello everyone and hope you all have very good holidays. First, this email is not directed on the author or the PR https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/pull/6794 it self, but i see this PR as a perfect example. One of the foundation of Apache Way or what i would simply call open source

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.13.0 [RC2]

2018-11-16 Thread Slim Bouguerra
Seems like this PR https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/pull/6639 with tag 0.13.0 Got merged very recently, therefore not included here So I do not see the point to really release this. -1 On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:05 PM David Lim wrote: > Hi all, > > I have created a build for Apache

Re: Druid PR review checklist

2018-11-13 Thread Slim Bouguerra
Great Doc. Since the end goal is a .md document as part of the github repo. How about you actually start a PR and with something like mark down document and peoples can interact with it via git comments, that will be better than google Docs thought. On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:25 AM Roman

Re: Druid Insert Issue

2018-10-30 Thread Slim Bouguerra
Can you please ask/submit an issue on the Hive JIRA issue tracker https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HIVE/issues/ and attach the logs of Hive job and what you get when you query druid ? What you see on the coordinator console or logs? Thanks Cordialement, Slim BOUGUERRA > On Oct

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.13.0 [RC1]

2018-10-22 Thread Slim Bouguerra
> you voted "+1". There are many folks here who have not been through > > the release process, and we veterans should show them the ropes. > > > > Julian > > > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 1:16 PM Slim Bouguerra > > > wrote: > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.13.0 [RC1]

2018-10-21 Thread Slim Bouguerra
+1 > On Oct 21, 2018, at 8:41 AM, David Lim wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have created a build for Apache Druid (incubating) 0.13.0, release > candidate 1. > > Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release! You can read the > proposed release notes here: >

Licensing questions

2018-10-19 Thread Slim Bouguerra
Looking at the http://druid.io/licensing i can see : Druid and the Druid logo are copyright Metamarkets Group Inc. Druid is a registered trademark of Metamarkets Group Inc. Is that the case or the page is outdated. Can someone please explain to me what was transferred to Apache-Foundation and what

Re: Question regarding distribution of GPL licensed MySQL Connector

2018-10-19 Thread Slim Bouguerra
We have to do something similar internally since we can not ship GPL code within our binaries. Thus we build MySQL connector and exclude the Driver form the artifacts. Then we instruct users on how to add the Driver Jars. FYI users usually have a platform dependent shared Mysql/Lzo drivers so

Re: Towards 0.13 (Apache release)

2018-08-30 Thread Slim Bouguerra
Thanks Gian worked for me! > On Aug 30, 2018, at 10:06 AM, Gian Merlino wrote: > > That PR is merged now! If anyone here still has outstanding PRs that are > now in conflict with master, try running this before merging master, it > really helps git out. > > git config --local

Dependencies licenses Report

2018-04-17 Thread Slim Bouguerra
One of the question last dev synch was about the generation of dependency licenses. Some projects (ORC and Hive) use the maven site plugin that can generates reports with all the dependencies and licenses details. I have run it on Druid and this is how it looks for Druid Api Module. cmd mvn

Re: Dev list migration

2018-04-17 Thread Slim Bouguerra
+1 > On Apr 17, 2018, at 10:49 AM, Gian Merlino wrote: > > Hi all, > > In the dev sync today there was some general agreement around migrating the > dev list to Apache next week. Please +1 or -1 in this thread as desired. > > I think ideally we'd want an autoresponder but I

Hi dev is there a dev synch up today? or am missing something?

2018-04-10 Thread Slim Bouguerra

Re: [druid-dev] consider doing a 0.12.1 release

2018-04-09 Thread Slim Bouguerra
+1 especially there is some instability bugs. On Apr 9, 2018, at 11:57 AM, Gian Merlino wrote: My feeling is that #3 and #2 are borderline, but #1 definitely warrants a new release. Personally I have seen it occur at least a half dozen times, and I had been thinking about