Hi,
> Reviewing the files in licenses/binary-license again I see there are some
> cases where we’ve included a “standard” NOTICE file (one lacking any
> additional attributions) for some AL-2.0 licensed dependencies. Justin,
> should these AL-2.0 “standard” NOTICES be included?
If it missing
On 12/2/2016 5:32 AM, Dale LaBossiere wrote:
I’ve created 1.0.0-incubating/rc2 under [4] and it’s time to vote!!!
+1
Thanks!
Dan.
> On Dec 7, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Dan Debrunner wrote:
> ...
> binary-release/NOTICE has lists of files for various ext folders, but the
> list of jars in some cases (connectors/iotp, connectors/kafka, at least) is a
> sub-set of the jars that end up in (for example):
>
> build/distributions/java8
On 12/2/2016 5:32 AM, Dale LaBossiere wrote:
I’ve created 1.0.0-incubating/rc2 under [4] and it’s time to vote!!!
A question, I downloaded the archive and built the release target.
binary-release/NOTICE has lists of files for various ext folders, but
the list of jars in some cases (connectors
On 12/2/2016 5:32 AM, Dale LaBossiere wrote:
> I’ve created 1.0.0-incubating/rc2 under [4] and it’s time to vote!!!
A question, I downloaded the archive and built the release target.
binary-release/NOTICE has lists of files for various ext folders, but
the list of jars in some cases (connectors
+1
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Cazen Lee wrote:
> Sorry for late. All tecase case passed in my case(mac and centos)
>
> [X] +1 accept
>
> --
> cazen@gmail.com
> cazen@samsung.com
> http://www.cazen.co.kr
> 2016. 12. 7. 오전 3:13에 "Susan Cline" 님이 작성:
>
> > Yay, I can vote +1. I reran
Sorry for late. All tecase case passed in my case(mac and centos)
[X] +1 accept
--
cazen@gmail.com
cazen@samsung.com
http://www.cazen.co.kr
2016. 12. 7. 오전 3:13에 "Susan Cline" 님이 작성:
> Yay, I can vote +1. I reran the tests and they succeeded.
>
> I believe the failure was due to a timi
Yay, I can vote +1. I reran the tests and they succeeded.
I believe the failure was due to a timing issue.
Cheers,
Susan
> On Dec 6, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Susan Cline wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to vote a +1, but my test run failed.
>
> Here is the output after running ./gradlew test .. everythi
+1
I ran the full test suite on java8 with no failures.
Thanks,
Victor
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Dale LaBossiere
wrote:
> I’ve created 1.0.0-incubating/rc2 under [4] and it’s time to vote!!!
>
> Before voting, see "The Vote" section in [2]
>
> [ ] +1 accept
> [ ] -1 reject
>
> Voting
Hi,
I want to vote a +1, but my test run failed.
Here is the output after running ./gradlew test .. everything up until this
point succeeded:
objc[56396]: Class JavaLaunchHelper is implemented in both
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_101.jdk/Contents/Home/bin/java
(0x108ea04c0) and
[X] +1 accept
--
Queenie
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Dale LaBossiere
wrote:
> [X] +1 accept
>
> — Dale
[X] +1 accept
— Dale
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE good
- Source NOTICE fine. The binary NOTICE is a little odd in it refers to
external files but we can fix that in a later release.
- No unexpected binaries in source release
- All source
I’ve created 1.0.0-incubating/rc2 under [4] and it’s time to vote!!!
Before voting, see "The Vote" section in [2]
[ ] +1 accept
[ ] -1 reject
Voting will be open until Dec 6th (unless we have a definitive binding vote
majority prior to that).
Apache Edgent release process documentation: [
14 matches
Mail list logo
