Hi,
> Reviewing the files in licenses/binary-license again I see there are some
> cases where we’ve included a “standard” NOTICE file (one lacking any
> additional attributions) for some AL-2.0 licensed dependencies. Justin,
> should these AL-2.0 “standard” NOTICES be included?
If it missing
On 12/2/2016 5:32 AM, Dale LaBossiere wrote:
I’ve created 1.0.0-incubating/rc2 under [4] and it’s time to vote!!!
+1
Thanks!
Dan.
> On Dec 7, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Dan Debrunner wrote:
> ...
> binary-release/NOTICE has lists of files for various ext folders, but the
> list of jars in some cases (connectors/iotp, connectors/kafka, at least) is a
> sub-set of the jars that end up in (for example):
>
> build/distributions/java8
On 12/2/2016 5:32 AM, Dale LaBossiere wrote:
I’ve created 1.0.0-incubating/rc2 under [4] and it’s time to vote!!!
A question, I downloaded the archive and built the release target.
binary-release/NOTICE has lists of files for various ext folders, but
the list of jars in some cases (connectors
On 12/2/2016 5:32 AM, Dale LaBossiere wrote:
> I’ve created 1.0.0-incubating/rc2 under [4] and it’s time to vote!!!
A question, I downloaded the archive and built the release target.
binary-release/NOTICE has lists of files for various ext folders, but
the list of jars in some cases (connectors
+1
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Cazen Lee wrote:
> Sorry for late. All tecase case passed in my case(mac and centos)
>
> [X] +1 accept
>
> --
> cazen@gmail.com
> cazen@samsung.com
> http://www.cazen.co.kr
> 2016. 12. 7. 오전 3:13에 "Susan Cline" 님이 작성:
>
> > Yay, I can vote +1. I reran
Sorry for late. All tecase case passed in my case(mac and centos)
[X] +1 accept
--
cazen@gmail.com
cazen@samsung.com
http://www.cazen.co.kr
2016. 12. 7. 오전 3:13에 "Susan Cline" 님이 작성:
> Yay, I can vote +1. I reran the tests and they succeeded.
>
> I believe the failure was due to a timi
Yay, I can vote +1. I reran the tests and they succeeded.
I believe the failure was due to a timing issue.
Cheers,
Susan
> On Dec 6, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Susan Cline wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to vote a +1, but my test run failed.
>
> Here is the output after running ./gradlew test .. everythi
+1
I ran the full test suite on java8 with no failures.
Thanks,
Victor
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Dale LaBossiere
wrote:
> I’ve created 1.0.0-incubating/rc2 under [4] and it’s time to vote!!!
>
> Before voting, see "The Vote" section in [2]
>
> [ ] +1 accept
> [ ] -1 reject
>
> Voting
Hi,
I want to vote a +1, but my test run failed.
Here is the output after running ./gradlew test .. everything up until this
point succeeded:
objc[56396]: Class JavaLaunchHelper is implemented in both
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_101.jdk/Contents/Home/bin/java
(0x108ea04c0) and
[X] +1 accept
--
Queenie
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Dale LaBossiere
wrote:
> [X] +1 accept
>
> — Dale
[X] +1 accept
— Dale
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE good
- Source NOTICE fine. The binary NOTICE is a little odd in it refers to
external files but we can fix that in a later release.
- No unexpected binaries in source release
- All source
Done.
> On Dec 1, 2016, at 6:03 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Great! Might be best to start a new thread for the VOTE.
>
> Justin
I’ve created 1.0.0-incubating/rc2 under [4] and it’s time to vote!!!
Before voting, see "The Vote" section in [2]
[ ] +1 accept
[ ] -1 reject
Voting will be open until Dec 6th (unless we have a definitive binding vote
majority prior to that).
Apache Edgent release process documentation: [
Hi,
Great! Might be best to start a new thread for the VOTE.
Justin
I’ve created 1.0.0-incubating/rc2 under [4] and it’s time to vote!!!
Before voting, see "The Vote" section in [2]
[ ] +1 accept
[ ] -1 reject
Voting will be open until Dec 6th (unless we have a definitive binding vote
majority prior to that).
Apache Edgent release process documentation: [
That is great to hear!
Cheers,
Susan
> On Nov 22, 2016, at 6:40 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
>
>> Thanks Dale. Sorry some (?) of your work making RC1 was wasted. I
>> appreciate all the work you are doing.
>
> Nothing is wasted and it means there less work to do on the next RC and in
> fut
Hi,
> Thanks Dale. Sorry some (?) of your work making RC1 was wasted. I
> appreciate all the work you are doing.
Nothing is wasted and it means there less work to do on the next RC and in
future releases.
BYW I don’t think I’ve even seen a podling get it right on the very first RC so
it wou
Thanks Dale. Sorry some (?) of your work making RC1 was wasted. I appreciate
all the work you are doing.
Susan
> On Nov 21, 2016, at 11:17 AM, Dale LaBossiere wrote:
>
> Well I guess we’ll get the opportunity to exercise that path of the process.
>
> Voting on RC1 is hereby cancelled.
>
>
Thanks for telling us Justin.
Susan
> On Nov 21, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’ve been on holiday and only just had a chance to take a look at the release.
>
> Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) from me due to the artefact names missing
> incubating and we have unexpected bi
Well I guess we’ll get the opportunity to exercise that path of the process.
Voting on RC1 is hereby cancelled.
I'll work on generating an RC2 that addresses the issues. Stay tuned.
— Dale
> On Nov 21, 2016, at 1:06 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> BTW you do have 3 +1 vote and only one
Hi,
BTW you do have 3 +1 vote and only one -1 vote, that is still enough to make a
release if you were a top level project. A -1 is not a veto on a release.
But with the binaries in the source release I don’t think this would pass an
incubator vote so it probably best IMO to cancel this vote, f
Hi,
I’ve been on holiday and only just had a chance to take a look at the release.
Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) from me due to the artefact names missing
incubating and we have unexpected binaries in the source release
I checked:
- incubating is not in name. See 3.1 of [1]
- signatures and hash
[X] +1 accept
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 3:52 AM Dale LaBossiere
wrote:
> [X] +1 accept I downloaded the RC1 bundles and rechecked everything with
> them: signatures, building, testing, samples, …
>
> — Dale
--
Cazen Lee
http://www.Cazen.co.kr
[X] +1 accept I downloaded the RC1 bundles and rechecked everything with
them: signatures, building, testing, samples, …
— Dale
[X] +1 accept
--
Queenie
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Dale LaBossiere
wrote:
> I believe we’re at the point of having done everything we intend and need
> to do on the release1.0.0 branch so I’ve created 1.0.0/rc1 under [4] and
> it’s time to vote!!!
>
> (I anticipate the satisfactory comp
I believe we’re at the point of having done everything we intend and need to do
on the release1.0.0 branch so I’ve created 1.0.0/rc1 under [4] and it’s time to
vote!!!
(I anticipate the satisfactory completion of testing items EDGENT-286 and
EDGENT-288; please complete those ASAP)
Before voti
28 matches
Mail list logo
