[Vote Result] Release Maven SCR Plugin 1.0.2

The vote for releasing the new version 1.0.2 of the Maven SCR plugin passed successfully with four +1 votes Felix Meschberger, Carsten Ziegeler, Stuart McCulloch, and Richard Hall. No other votes were cast. I'll continue with uploading the release asap. Thanks Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMA

[Vote Result] Release javax.servlet 1.0.0

The vote for releasing the new version 1.0.0 of the javax.servlet bundle passed successfully with eight +1 votes Carsten Ziegeler, Stuart McCulloch, Rob Walker, Karl Pauls, Richard Hall, Niclas Hedhman, Felix Meschberger, and Clement Escoffier. No other votes were cast. I'll continue with upl

Re: [Vote Result] release maven-obr-plugin 1.0.0

On 11/01/2008, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The vote for releasing 1.0.0 of the maven-obr-plugin sub-project has > passed successfully > with +1 votes from Richard S. Hall, Carsten Ziegeler, Stuart McCulloch, > Felix Meschberger, > Karl Pauls, and Clement Escoffier > > I'll uploa

[Vote Result] release maven-obr-plugin 1.0.0

The vote for releasing 1.0.0 of the maven-obr-plugin sub-project has passed successfully with +1 votes from Richard S. Hall, Carsten Ziegeler, Stuart McCulloch, Felix Meschberger, Karl Pauls, and Clement Escoffier I'll upload the release today - unfortunately, I'll need to make another release bec

[jira] Updated: (FELIX-455) Manifest generated by the bundle:manifest goal contains invalid version strings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stuart McCulloch updated FELIX-455: --- Attachment: testcase.zip Sample testcase (assumes you have snapshots of some Maven 2.1 artifac

[jira] Assigned: (FELIX-455) Manifest generated by the bundle:manifest goal contains invalid version strings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stuart McCulloch reassigned FELIX-455: -- Assignee: Stuart McCulloch > Manifest generated by the bundle:manifest goal contains inv

[jira] Created: (FELIX-455) Manifest generated by the bundle:manifest goal contains invalid version strings

Manifest generated by the bundle:manifest goal contains invalid version strings --- Key: FELIX-455 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-455 Project: Felix

Deploying SNAPSHOTs

Hi All, I have some question about SNAPSHOT artifact: 1 - Can SNAPSHOT be deployed without a VOTE? 2 - Do all the committers have the right for deploying artifact? I'm asking those questions because I would like to release a SNAPSHOT for all the upnp moduels. Ciao, Stefano "Kismet" Lenzi

Re: Running Eclipse plugin bundles under Felix

On 08/01/2008, Rajini Sivaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, Hi Rajini, I was trying to get Apache Tuscany SDO implementation to run under Felix, > and found that it had dependencies on EMF, which is built as Eclipse > plugins. The bundle manifest entries of the EMF jars use Require-Bundl

Re: [jira] Created: (FELIX-452) Deployment Admin contribution

Again, more info: One of the Incubator's roles is to ensure that proper attention is paid to intellectual property. From time to time, an external codebase is brought into the ASF that is not a separate incubating project but still represents

Re: [jira] Created: (FELIX-452) Deployment Admin contribution

Alan D. Cabrera wrote: You guys are still in the incubator? No, but contributions still need to go throw IP clearance, which is handled by the incubator...or at least that is how it was explained to us. Granted, I could be completely confused, but I am just trying to follow the steps as I u

Re: Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

On 10/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 10, 2008 2:56 AM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On 10/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 9, 2008 5:35 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > On 09/01/2

Re: [jira] Created: (FELIX-452) Deployment Admin contribution

You guys are still in the incubator? Regards, Alan On Jan 10, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Richard S. Hall wrote: Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Not that I'm itching to push this through but a 72 hour cooling period for IP clearance is new to me and I have pushed through a few contributions. It is my under

Re: [jira] Created: (FELIX-452) Deployment Admin contribution

Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Not that I'm itching to push this through but a 72 hour cooling period for IP clearance is new to me and I have pushed through a few contributions. It is my understanding is that once the office ACKs the paperwork receipt the contribution is good to go. This is taken d

Re: [jira] Created: (FELIX-452) Deployment Admin contribution

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 10.01.2008, 10:20 -0500 schrieb Richard S. Hall: > We cannot commit, because we are still in the "ip clearance" phase...it > has taken a little while, but we just finished the last step yesterday. > This means we have to wait 72 hours to make sure that no one objects to >

Re: [jira] Created: (FELIX-452) Deployment Admin contribution

Not that I'm itching to push this through but a 72 hour cooling period for IP clearance is new to me and I have pushed through a few contributions. It is my understanding is that once the office ACKs the paperwork receipt the contribution is good to go. Regards, Alan On Jan 10, 2008, at

[jira] Work stopped: (FELIX-434) Add support for the authentication type and remote user data if HttpContext.handleSecurity is used.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on FELIX-434 stopped by Felix Meschberger. > Add support for the authentication type and remote user data if > HttpContext.handleSecurity is used. >

Re: [jira] Created: (FELIX-452) Deployment Admin contribution

We cannot commit, because we are still in the "ip clearance" phase...it has taken a little while, but we just finished the last step yesterday. This means we have to wait 72 hours to make sure that no one objects to any IP issues before committing. -> richard Felix Meschberger wrote: Hi Marc

Re: http.jetty based on Jetty 6

Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Wednesday 09 January 2008 23:07, Richard S. Hall wrote: Well, the original Felix project proposal was to implement the entire spec and bring open source OSGi communities together under one project. So, it seems to me that we should have our own and/or encouraging PAX

RE: [VOTE] Release javax.servlet 1.0.0

+1 Regards, Clement > -Message d'origine- > De : Felix Meschberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : jeudi 10 janvier 2008 08:30 > À : dev@felix.apache.org > Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release javax.servlet 1.0.0 > > +1 > > Regards > Felix > > Am Montag, den 07.01.2008, 15:00 +0100 schrieb

RE: [Vote] release maven-obr-plugin 1.0.0

+1 Regards, Clement > -Message d'origine- > De : Karl Pauls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : jeudi 10 janvier 2008 08:24 > À : dev@felix.apache.org > Objet : Re: [Vote] release maven-obr-plugin 1.0.0 > > +1 > > regards, > > Karl > > On Jan 10, 2008 2:09 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EM

Re: [jira] Created: (FELIX-452) Deployment Admin contribution

Felix Meschberger wrote: Hi Marcel, The software grant seems to have been registered 26. Nov 2007. So I think it would be save to commit it. As I also want to also work on the autoconf stuff, we might have the following structure: felix/trunk +- deploymentadmin +--- s

Re: Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

On Jan 10, 2008 2:56 AM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Jan 9, 2008 5:35 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > On 09/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jan 9, 20

Re: [VOTE] Release javax.servlet 1.0.0

+1 Regards Felix Am Montag, den 07.01.2008, 15:00 +0100 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: > Hi, > > I've compiled the release candidate for our first official javax.servlet > release (1.0.0) and put it up here: > > http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/felix/javax.servlet/ > > The KEYS file fo

Re: Look at migration to more recent Jetty version (FELIX-55)

Hi Niclas, Am Donnerstag, den 10.01.2008, 16:42 +0800 schrieb Niclas Hedhman: > On Wednesday 09 January 2008 15:34, Rob Walker wrote: > > The Felix layer just provides registration of aliases > > And this needs to be fixed in a new version (compared to org.ungoverned), > since Jetty (at Jetty4)

Re: [Vote] release maven-obr-plugin 1.0.0

+1 regards, Karl On Jan 10, 2008 2:09 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > Regards > Felix > > Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2008, 11:47 +0800 schrieb Stuart McCulloch: > > > Hi folks, > > > > I'd like to start a vote for the first release of the maven-obr-plugin. > > I've built an

Re: maven-bundle-plugin problem

Sorry, released to early ... Kind regards, Peter Kriens On 8 jan 2008, at 13:27, Stuart McCulloch wrote: On 08/01/2008, Hampel, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, first happy new year to all of you. After trying to build my projects today (and getting the newest bundle-plug

Re: [Vote] release maven-obr-plugin 1.0.0

+1 Regards Felix Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2008, 11:47 +0800 schrieb Stuart McCulloch: > Hi folks, > > I'd like to start a vote for the first release of the maven-obr-plugin. > I've built and signed the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here: > > http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/feli

Re: [jira] Created: (FELIX-452) Deployment Admin contribution

Hi Marcel, The software grant seems to have been registered 26. Nov 2007. So I think it would be save to commit it. As I also want to also work on the autoconf stuff, we might have the following structure: felix/trunk +- deploymentadmin +--- service +--

Re: Look at migration to more recent Jetty version (FELIX-55)

But my memory could be inaccurate. Mine too these days ;)

Re: Look at migration to more recent Jetty version (FELIX-55)

On Thursday 10 January 2008 16:56, Rob Walker wrote: > > And this needs to be fixed in a new version (compared to org.ungoverned), > > since Jetty (at Jetty4) resolves the URL space differently from the OSGi > > spec. Keep that in mind, FelixM. > > Can't remember if we have a Jira issue for this -

Re: Look at migration to more recent Jetty version (FELIX-55)

And this needs to be fixed in a new version (compared to org.ungoverned), since Jetty (at Jetty4) resolves the URL space differently from the OSGi spec. Keep that in mind, FelixM. Can't remember if we have a Jira issue for this - but if not, can I get you to add one with some examples of

[jira] Created: (FELIX-454) Deployment Admin: Provide implementation of the R4.1 Autoconf Service

Deployment Admin: Provide implementation of the R4.1 Autoconf Service - Key: FELIX-454 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-454 Project: Felix Issue Type: New Fe

Re: Look at migration to more recent Jetty version (FELIX-55)

On Wednesday 09 January 2008 15:34, Rob Walker wrote: > The Felix layer just provides registration of aliases And this needs to be fixed in a new version (compared to org.ungoverned), since Jetty (at Jetty4) resolves the URL space differently from the OSGi spec. Keep that in mind, FelixM. Chee

Re: New PMC Member

Cool, congrats and great to have you there, Stuart! /peter

Re: New PMC Member

On Wednesday 09 January 2008 06:23, Felix Meschberger wrote: > On behalf of the PMC, congratulations Stuart and keep up the great work. Warm welcome of Stuart to the PMC. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymel

Re: http.jetty based on Jetty 6

On Wednesday 09 January 2008 23:07, Richard S. Hall wrote: > Well, the original Felix project proposal was to implement the entire > spec and bring open source OSGi communities together under one project. > So, it seems to me that we should have our own and/or encouraging PAX to > join us. The re

Re: [jira] Commented: (FELIX-55) Look at migration to more recent Jetty version

Hi Alexander, I cannot reproduce your findings under linux and windows xp. Can you check whith a clean checkout - also cleaning your local maven repository for org/apache/felix, just rebuilding http.jetty ? Regards Felix Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2008, 06:29 -0800 schrieb Alexander Klimetschek (JIR

Re: [VOTE] Release javax.servlet 1.0.0

On Monday 07 January 2008 22:00, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: +1 Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug