Hi Dieter,
Thanks for your response. So here is what I propose.
As I understand you are willing to donate the simple telnet code
described in [1] to the Apache Felix project. To get around the
licensing cliffs, we need to follow a few steps:
* First I suggest you create a JIRA and attach t
Richard,
Let us know if we can help.
Sure, as soon as I can find time to proceed with it and run into
something where I need help.
Richard:
Honestly, I actually put together the telnetconsole bundle because
I didn't want to "cripple" telnetd-osgi into something that's no
longer useful
Dieter Wimberger wrote:
Hi all,
I'll try to get through step by step.
Rob:
Embedded, probably. Would need to check if I used any API (net, io)
that's >= 1.3.
Felix:
Sure. The idea was from the beginning to provide felix (project) with
the functionality of a remote shell access.
There are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12608571#action_12608571
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-602:
---
The issue is that the system bundle is not cr
Felix, Craig:
I have dropped the sources for the telnetconsole bundle here:
http://www.karanet.at/~wimpi/felix/telnetconsole-src.zip
//@license@ should be the Apache 2 License (of the Felix Project).
The headers I used are:
-> headers 5
Apache Felix Telnet Management Console (5)
-
Hi all,
I'll try to get through step by step.
Rob:
Embedded, probably. Would need to check if I used any API (net, io)
that's >= 1.3.
Felix:
Sure. The idea was from the beginning to provide felix (project) with
the functionality of a remote shell access.
There are only two classes in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12608549#action_12608549
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-602:
---
As a status report, the above patch is not su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall reassigned FELIX-602:
-
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
> Symbolic name system.bundle is not recognized
> --
Sahoo wrote:
Stuart McCulloch wrote:
2008/6/12 Toni Menzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Just a shot in: speaking of legacy code (non osgi) using TCCL:
The makewave guys explain bytecode weaving to fix those "broken" code:
google for "makewave everything can be a bundle" to get some slides
about
t
Completely agreed.
It is very nice to have a lightweight raw connection glue bundle for
shell access. The security weakness can be easily suppressed by
allowing only trusted hosts (in a local network or something).
By the other hand, it is very useful to have that full featured
implementation. Ma
I think this is very cool and I am sure that other people would agree
with me that such a small bundle would be cool in addition to a more
full featured one. We are greedy, aren't we? ;-)
-> richard
Dieter Wimberger wrote:
Richard, all:
Thought I put the "simple access alternative" together
Stuart McCulloch wrote:
2008/6/12 Toni Menzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Just a shot in: speaking of legacy code (non osgi) using TCCL:
The makewave guys explain bytecode weaving to fix those "broken" code:
google for "makewave everything can be a bundle" to get some slides about
that.
Sure, this
Did you try to look at the threaddump
(http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/Programming/Stacktrace/)?
Could you maybe post it?
regards,
Karl
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Craig Phillips
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm experiencing something weird in one newly created works
Hi,
Well... it was the order of the bundles within the auto.start.1... The
telnetd.jar or telnetconsole.jar bundle has to be the first entry (well, for
me), ahead of shell and tui... When I put telnetd.jar / telnetconsole.jar last,
well -- then I get a conflict...
For what it's worth, Craig
Hi,
I'm experiencing something weird in one newly created workspace/project, which
is pretty much a replica of others...
If I install any of the various telnet bundles, from the one below to the
original telnetd to the one-off I recreated from source, set up a sandbox to
run (meaning, bin and
Hi there
I have a question regarding the underlying driver in the UPnP bundle.
In the class BuildDevice.java, we find the method below:
private static void buildDevice(String id,Device parent, ServiceReference sr) {
Node dev = new Node(Device.ELEM_NAME);DeviceData dd = new
Devic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12608461#action_12608461
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-614:
-
This functionality is Implemented in Rev.
Change behaviour of little arrow on single bundle/component display
---
Key: FELIX-614
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-614
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Improvemen
Hi,
Just tried it out... super small and super fast... For the tiny solution, this
looks perfect...
Any chance I could see the source? I want to learn! :)
BTW - I'm working through the tutorial page on the Felix shell service as I
want to do other mediums, such as JMS and JMX...
Kind regard
Hi Dieter,
That _IS_ cool. Thanks alot. While full telnetd functionality is
certainly valid in its own right. For a simple Felix shell it is
probably sufficient to have such a tiny thing.
Are you willing to contribute the source of this to Apache Felix ?
Regards
Felix
Dieter Wimberger schr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger resolved FELIX-399.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Felix Meschberger
I have applied my last patch (after fi
21 matches
Mail list logo
