[jira] Created: (FELIX-693) Improve error handling for ResolverImpl.deploy() method

Improve error handling for ResolverImpl.deploy() method --- Key: FELIX-693 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-693 Project: Felix Issue Type: Improvement Components:

Re: [VOTE] Release OSGi Modules 1.2.0

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> >> Richard S. Hall wrote: >> >>> >>> Hmmm. >>> >>> +1 for core. >>> >>> Essentially, +1 for compendium, but I am not sure since it now depends >>> on Foundation 1.2.0, but I don't think any cha

Re: [VOTE] Release OSGi Modules 1.2.0

Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Richard S. Hall wrote: Hmmm. +1 for core. Essentially, +1 for compendium, but I am not sure since it now depends on Foundation 1.2.0, but I don't think any changes were made to foundation, so I am not sure we should be doing a release on it. (Sorry, I didn't notice t

Re: Remote Shell

Richard S. Hall wrote: > Dieter Wimberger wrote: >> To give an example, the commons-collections project seems to keep >> their developers (= comitters) and contributors in the POM file, using >> a section like: >> >> ... >> >>fmeschbe >>Felix Meschberger >> >> ... >> >> >> ..

Re: Remote Shell

Dieter Wimberger wrote: Richard, Felix: I think that the ICLA I signed and sent to the Apache Foundation Secretary cleary states the legal terms of the contribution. Given paragraph 2. Grant of Copyright License, I am granting the Apache Foundation and all recipients of the software distribu

Maven plugin to generate deployment packages

Hi, I've started work on a maven plugin which will generate a deployment package that can be deployed through the DeploymentAdmin. I've committed a first version to my sandbox. This version is only able to add bundles to the package and the required meta data. I've successfully deployed such pack

Re: [VOTE] Release OSGi Modules 1.2.0

Richard S. Hall wrote: > Hmmm. > > +1 for core. > > Essentially, +1 for compendium, but I am not sure since it now depends > on Foundation 1.2.0, but I don't think any changes were made to > foundation, so I am not sure we should be doing a release on it. (Sorry, > I didn't notice that you did la

Re: [VOTE] Release OSGi Modules 1.2.0

Hmmm. +1 for core. Essentially, +1 for compendium, but I am not sure since it now depends on Foundation 1.2.0, but I don't think any changes were made to foundation, so I am not sure we should be doing a release on it. (Sorry, I didn't notice that you did last time.) Of course, it is not the

Re: Remote Shell

Richard, Felix: I think that the ICLA I signed and sent to the Apache Foundation Secretary cleary states the legal terms of the contribution. Given paragraph 2. Grant of Copyright License, I am granting the Apache Foundation and all recipients of the software distributed by the Foundation

[jira] Resolved: (FELIX-674) Better error reporting when loading bundle classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Karl Pauls resolved FELIX-674. -- Resolution: Fixed Better error reporting when loading bundle classes using Bundle.loadClass is in as of

[jira] Resolved: (FELIX-654) Subject.doAs not supported

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Karl Pauls resolved FELIX-654. -- Resolution: Fixed I think the current fix is reasonable and seems to work -- hence, I will close this i

Re: [VOTE] Release OSGi Modules 1.2.0

+1 Carsten Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Hi, > > as discussed yesterday (and today...) I've assembled a > release candidates for core, compendium and foundation. > You'll find the assmebled files for the 1.2.0 releasehere: > > http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/osgi/ > > The KEYS file fo

[VOTE] Release OSGi Modules 1.2.0

Hi, as discussed yesterday (and today...) I've assembled a release candidates for core, compendium and foundation. You'll find the assmebled files for the 1.2.0 releasehere: http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/osgi/ The KEYS file for verifying the signature is also in this directory. S

Re: [Vote] Release osgi modules 1.1.0

Richard S. Hall wrote: > Carsten, > > Thank for getting this going, but we follow an odd/even minor version > number release policy for developmental/stable. So, unless we only > increment the micro number, this release should be 1.2.0... > > The main reason for this approach is that it work nic

Re: Remote Shell

Felix Meschberger wrote: Hi, Richard S. Hall schrieb: Regarding the NOTICE file, I don't think we want the "originally developed" stuff in there. That was the whole point of the IP clearance, so that this can be claimed to be Apache software. To acknowledge Deiter, we should use one of the ot

Re: [Vote] Release osgi modules 1.1.0

Carsten, Thank for getting this going, but we follow an odd/even minor version number release policy for developmental/stable. So, unless we only increment the micro number, this release should be 1.2.0... The main reason for this approach is that it work nicely for keeping our released pro

[jira] Resolved: (FELIX-687) Support inner and nested classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Clement Escoffier resolved FELIX-687. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed in the revision 687319. The manipulator detects and manipulates in

[jira] Resolved: (FELIX-689) Instance 'name' property should become 'instance.name'

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Clement Escoffier resolved FELIX-689. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed in the revision 687319 The 'name' property is now replaced by 'ins

[jira] Resolved: (FELIX-688) Better error reporting when an instance creation failed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Clement Escoffier resolved FELIX-688. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed in the revision 687319. Error reporting improvements when an insta

[jira] Created: (FELIX-692) OBR should provide an API for resolving bundles dependencies regardless of locally installed bundles

OBR should provide an API for resolving bundles dependencies regardless of locally installed bundles Key: FELIX-692 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FEL

[jira] Created: (FELIX-691) Add support for the deployment admin

Add support for the deployment admin Key: FELIX-691 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-691 Project: Felix Issue Type: New Feature Components: Web Console Affects Versions: webc

Re: [Vote] Release osgi modules 1.1.0

+1 Regards Felix Carsten Ziegeler schrieb: Hi, as discussed yesterday I've assembled release candidates for core, compendium and foundation. You'll find the files here: http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/osgi/ The KEYS file for verifying the signature is also in this directory. So

Re: Remote Shell

Hi, Richard S. Hall schrieb: Regarding the NOTICE file, I don't think we want the "originally developed" stuff in there. That was the whole point of the IP clearance, so that this can be claimed to be Apache software. To acknowledge Deiter, we should use one of the other approaches that I ment

Re: Remote Shell

Hi Dieter Wimberger schrieb: I would like to ask you to quickly have a look at the NOTICE file for any glitches. Just a glitch (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/shell.remote/NOTICE): I think that in Section I, "developped" should only have one p. Oh yeah ! I never know much p's

Re: Remote Shell

Hi, Richard S. Hall schrieb: Excellent work. Thanks ;-) Knowing that we might expect other forms of remote access, is "shell.remote" the best name for this subproject? Not sure either; it just came to my mind as a first idea and I kind of liked it. We are also talking about "Simple Remote