+1 (non binding vote)
/pierre
Marcel Offermans wrote:
Hello all,
I'm opening a vote for the 2.0.1 release candidate of the dependency
manager and its optional shell command bundle. I've compiled
everything and put it up for testing and checking here:
http://people.apache.org/~marrs/depende
+1
Regards
Felix
Marcel Offermans schrieb:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm opening a vote for the 2.0.1 release candidate of the dependency
> manager and its optional shell command bundle. I've compiled everything
> and put it up for testing and checking here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~marrs/dependenc
2009/3/30 Felix Meschberger
> Hi,
>
> Stuart McCulloch schrieb:
> > also I think we should add a "log" command to the shell otherwise you
> > can't retrieve the log events (unless you add your own log reader...)
>
> How about implementing this in the shell service bundle itself or in a
> standalo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kristian Koehler closed FELIX-973.
--
Thanks!
Kristian
> FilterImpl from Felix Framework does not support none LDAP operators
>
Hi,
On 31.03.2009, at 08:06, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
Stuart McCulloch schrieb:
also I think we should add a "log" command to the shell otherwise you
can't retrieve the log events (unless you add your own log reader...)
How about implementing this in the shell service bundle itself or
+1 from me
--
Ascert - Taking systems to the Edge
r...@ascert.com
+44 (0)20 7488 3470
www.ascert.com
Hi,
Stuart McCulloch schrieb:
> also I think we should add a "log" command to the shell otherwise you
> can't retrieve the log events (unless you add your own log reader...)
How about implementing this in the shell service bundle itself or in a
standalone bundle. I assume, such a command would on
2009/3/30 Clement Escoffier
> Hi all,
>
> I cut a release of the Felix log service. This service implementation was
> developed and but never released.
> It's a simple implementation, but can be useful.
>
> The source and binary release archives, signature files, SHA and MD5
> message digests for
+1 from me too. This sounds great!
Kristian
Freeman Fang wrote:
+1 for this idea.
Freeman
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
During ApacheCon last week, there has been some discussions around
moving ServiceMix Kernel as a subproject of Felix.
ServiceMix Kernel is a packaged distribution of Felix designed
-- Forwarded message --
From: Lars Heinemann
Date: 2009/3/30
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move ServiceMix Kernel into Felix as a subproject
To: d...@servicemix.apache.org
+1 for moving it to Felix as sub project. Already discussed that a bit
at ApacheCon.
I think everything is already
+1
I see you removed the LICENSE and NOTICE files from src/main/resources,
but I think you can also remove the Include-Resource instruction from
the pom file, since the default value will include them. We can fix that
in trunk.
-> richard
On 3/30/09 7:48 AM, Clement Escoffier wrote:
Hi all
p.s. Your KEYS file was not included, but I grabbed it from the last
release...if you haven't done so, it should also be appended here, I
believe:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/KEYS
On 3/30/09 11:22 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
+1
Technically, dependencymanager.shell also "uses" so
+1
Technically, dependencymanager.shell also "uses" software developed at
Apache (i.e., Felix' shell), but this is not a big deal and can be
updated in trunk.
-> richard
On 3/30/09 3:59 PM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
Hello all,
I'm opening a vote for the 2.0.1 release candidate of the depende
+1 for this idea.
Freeman
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
During ApacheCon last week, there has been some discussions around
moving ServiceMix Kernel as a subproject of Felix.
ServiceMix Kernel is a packaged distribution of Felix designed for
server side applications (see http://servicemix.apache.org/ker
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall resolved FELIX-973.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Ok, I applied this. Please close if you are satisfied and thanks a lot!
> F
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-973:
--
Fix Version/s: bundlerepository-1.4.0
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
> FilterImpl from Felix
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:23 PM, James Strachan
wrote:
> If the Felix folks are happy I see it as a win-win really. This could
> be a good way to help build the ServiceMix Kernel community - which is
> mostly to do with OSGi and little to do with ESBs and JBI and so forth
> - as well as building a
Hello all,
I'm opening a vote for the 2.0.1 release candidate of the dependency
manager and its optional shell command bundle. I've compiled
everything and put it up for testing and checking here:
http://people.apache.org/~marrs/dependencymanager-2.0.1/
The KEYS file for verifying the sign
Yes, it sounds like an excellent idea to me as well. Let's do it...
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
2009/3/30 Karl Pauls :
> Sounds good to me!
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at
+1
I think that moving SMX Kernel as a subproject of Felix is a good idea from
the two points of view :
- increase the community around Kernel and provide a great OSGi framework by
gathering both Felix and Kernel
- for the ServiceMix community, we can focus on the first purpose of
ServiceMix : pr
2009/3/30 Guillaume Nodet
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 19:49, Jamie G. wrote:
> > I agree, this sounds like a win-win for all involved (as per James /
> > Guillaume's post).
> >
> > As a name submission I'd like Carafe (pronounced "karaf"). A carafe is
> > a small container used for serving wine an
Carafe is a container whereas OSGi is an organizer.
How about Obama? :-) Or, Diorganos?
On Mar 30, 2009, at 12:15 PM, Rob Davies wrote:
like the name!
On 30 Mar 2009, at 18:49, Jamie G. wrote:
I agree, this sounds like a win-win for all involved (as per James /
Guillaume's post).
As a nam
Sounds good to me!
regards,
Karl
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> I think this sounds interesting. If it helps server-based projects move to
> OSGi, then I think it is a good thing.
>
> -> richard
>
> On 3/30/09 12:03 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>> During ApacheCon la
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 19:49, Jamie G. wrote:
> I agree, this sounds like a win-win for all involved (as per James /
> Guillaume's post).
>
> As a name submission I'd like Carafe (pronounced "karaf"). A carafe is
> a small container used for serving wine and other drinks
> (http://en.wikipedia.or
like the name!
On 30 Mar 2009, at 18:49, Jamie G. wrote:
I agree, this sounds like a win-win for all involved (as per James /
Guillaume's post).
As a name submission I'd like Carafe (pronounced "karaf"). A carafe is
a small container used for serving wine and other drinks
(http://en.wikipedia.o
Agreed. If this does happen - we'll need a cool name (which doesn't
have ServiceMix in the title :).
Anyone any suggestions? Naming is super hard!
2009/3/30 Chris Custine :
> I think this would be a great move, and like Guillaume said, would increase
> the visibility substantially. I think a few
2009/3/30 Alex Karasulu :
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> During ApacheCon last week, there has been some discussions around
>> moving ServiceMix Kernel as a subproject of Felix.
>> ServiceMix Kernel is a packaged distribution of Felix designed for
>> server side app
If the Felix folks are happy I see it as a win-win really. This could
be a good way to help build the ServiceMix Kernel community - which is
mostly to do with OSGi and little to do with ESBs and JBI and so forth
- as well as building a stronger community of folks from both
ServiceMix and Felix. Am
I think this sounds interesting. If it helps server-based projects move
to OSGi, then I think it is a good thing.
-> richard
On 3/30/09 12:03 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
During ApacheCon last week, there has been some discussions around
moving ServiceMix Kernel as a subproject of Felix.
Service
2009/3/30 Richard S. Hall
> Interesting. Good work.
>
> Did both of these come from ServiceMix, meaning they were developed at
> Apache? Just wondering with respect to IP.
>
> Both will become Felix subprojects it looks like. Are they ready for
> release "as is" or is more work needed?
>
> Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12693870#action_12693870
]
Pierre De Rop commented on FELIX-992:
-
I tested and it works fine. Thanks Marcel !
> Al
I agree, this sounds like a win-win for all involved (as per James /
Guillaume's post).
As a name submission I'd like Carafe (pronounced "karaf"). A carafe is
a small container used for serving wine and other drinks
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carafe). In similarity to the name the
Kernel allows
I also think it's a win-win (for the same reasons mentioned by
James/Guillaume)
alex
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:23 AM, James Strachan wrote:
> If the Felix folks are happy I see it as a win-win really. This could
> be a good way to help build the ServiceMix Kernel community - which is
> mostly t
I think this would be a great move, and like Guillaume said, would increase
the visibility substantially. I think a few Apache projects have started
tracking ServiceMix Kernel and might be using it as the basis for their OSGi
based projects. However, when most people see the ServiceMix moniker, t
Hi,
I will look into it this week.
Thanks for the contributionS!
Regards,
Clement
On 30.03.2009, at 18:15, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 17:56, Richard S. Hall
wrote:
Interesting. Good work.
Did both of these come from ServiceMix, meaning they were developed
at
Apa
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> During ApacheCon last week, there has been some discussions around
> moving ServiceMix Kernel as a subproject of Felix.
> ServiceMix Kernel is a packaged distribution of Felix designed for
> server side applications (see http://servicemix.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 17:56, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> Interesting. Good work.
>
> Did both of these come from ServiceMix, meaning they were developed at
> Apache? Just wondering with respect to IP.
I have developped both inside ServiceMix.
The original code is available at
https://svn.apache.
During ApacheCon last week, there has been some discussions around
moving ServiceMix Kernel as a subproject of Felix.
ServiceMix Kernel is a packaged distribution of Felix designed for
server side applications (see http://servicemix.apache.org/kernel/ for
more informations).
I think this would be
Interesting. Good work.
Did both of these come from ServiceMix, meaning they were developed at
Apache? Just wondering with respect to IP.
Both will become Felix subprojects it looks like. Are they ready for
release "as is" or is more work needed?
Thanks for the contribution.
-> richard
On
I have attached to the above issues two patches which consist of
implementations of RFC-0142 (JNDI integration) and RFC-98
(Transactions in OSGi).
I have refactored the implementations in ServiceMix NMR so that they
do not have any dependenies on Spring-DM and become standalone
bundles.
Feedback we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kristian Koehler closed FELIX-977.
--
Thanks!
Kristian
> Bundle resolving runs extreme long
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall resolved FELIX-977.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: bundlerepository-1.4.0
Assignee: Richard S. Ha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated FELIX-1012:
---
Attachment: FELIX-1012.patch
This implementation is a rewrite of the ServiceMix NMR transacti
Transactions in OSGi (RFC 98)
-
Key: FELIX-1012
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1012
Project: Felix
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
--
This message is automatica
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kristian Koehler updated FELIX-977:
---
Attachment: FELIX-977-2009-03-30.txt
Hi Richard
yes. works great.
I modified your patch a b
Hi all,
Would it be possible for someone to apply the attached patch ?
I have some tests available that depend on this patch.
When these test have been added we might also consider a first release
for the device manager ;-)
regards, dennis
On 18 mrt 2009, at 11:37, Dennis Geurts (JIRA) wr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12693769#action_12693769
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-977:
---
Ok, as far as I can see, I forgot to add the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-977:
--
Attachment: FELIX-977-new.txt
> Bundle resolving runs extreme long
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12693760#action_12693760
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-977:
---
Yeah, I think my changes are incomplete. I ha
+1
Regards
Felix
Clement Escoffier schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> I cut a release of the Felix log service. This service implementation
> was developed and but never released.
> It's a simple implementation, but can be useful.
>
> The source and binary release archives, signature files, SHA and MD5
> m
Hi all,
I cut a release of the Felix log service. This service implementation
was developed and but never released.
It's a simple implementation, but can be useful.
The source and binary release archives, signature files, SHA and MD5
message digests for each are available as zip and tar.gz he
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12693691#action_12693691
]
Kristian Koehler commented on FELIX-977:
I'm not sure but... where do you add entrie
Hi,
Marcel Offermans schrieb:
>> as well as propose an Apache project for a
>> provisioning server.
>
> We had very positive feedback from the community at ApacheCon about
> this, so I'm going to submit a proposal on this to the incubator in a
> week or two. Feel free to express your interest if
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> This project could also start as a subproject of felix and if there is
> sufficient momentum around it, become a TLP later. I think it is an
> easier process ...
>
I guess you're refering to the distribution idea here, so a big +1 for
this approach. Starting at Felix shou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated FELIX-1011:
---
Attachment: FELIX-1011.patch
This patch includes a simple (and incomplete) implementation of
JNDI / OSGi integation (RFC 0142)
-
Key: FELIX-1011
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1011
Project: Felix
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
--
This message is au
On 30.03.2009, at 08:04, Rob Walker wrote:
Certainly has been stable our side with the fixes a couple of months
back.
I'll do an update this week and check the trunk version is still ok
Great, keep me posted.
I will look at License/Notice/Header file today.
Clement
- Rob
Clement Escof
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Sorry, I think I misread your proposition. I thought it was referring
> to the "distribution" for an OSGi framework (such as ServiceMix
> Kernel).
> Given the size of the donation, the incubator could be a good target.
+1
- robert
59 matches
Mail list logo
