Release looks pretty good, scripts run fine and Karaf also builds fine
using this release.
Thank you very much and +1 (non-binding) :-)
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 08:46, Rob Walker wrote:
> +1
> Cheers
> - Rob
>
>
> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> We solved 17 issues in this release:
>>>
2011/11/28 Reto Bachmann-Gmür :
> Well, the old annotations could also be improved so that FELIX-2892
> and the (probably duplicate) FELIX-3187 could be resolved.
>
> These issue would need changing the retention level
Yepp, this will be done
> and adding the
> bind-methods in the bytecode instead
+1
Cheers
- Rob
Hi folks,
We solved 17 issues in this release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/sr/jira.issueviews:searchrequest-printable/temp/SearchRequest.html?jqlQuery=project+%3D+FELIX+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%22maven-bundle-plugin-2.3.6%22
There are still some outstanding issues:
https
+1
Thank you very much.
Regards
Felix
Am 28.11.2011 um 18:31 schrieb Stuart McCulloch:
> Hi folks,
>
> We solved 17 issues in this release:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/sr/jira.issueviews:searchrequest-printable/temp/SearchRequest.html?jqlQuery=project+%3D+FELIX+AND+fixVersion+%3D+
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On 11/29/2011 08:00 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
+1
Carsten
2011/11/29 Stuart McCulloch:
On 28 Nov 2011, at 17:31, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Hi folks,
We solved 17 issues in this release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/sr/jira.issueviews:searchrequest-printabl
+1
Carsten
2011/11/29 Stuart McCulloch :
> On 28 Nov 2011, at 17:31, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> We solved 17 issues in this release:
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/sr/jira.issueviews:searchrequest-printable/temp/SearchRequest.html?jqlQuery=project+%3D+FELIX+AND+fixVers
On 11/29/11 1:43, Ken Gilmer wrote:
Richard,
Ah, that makes sense... So the release version literal is specified not
in the pom but via the prompt from running "mvn release:prepare" during the
release process. I was confused but now I think I'm clear.
Exactly.
-> richard
Thanks,
ken
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159119#comment-13159119
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-2950:
I should add, Service Tracker will be mov
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159118#comment-13159118
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-2950:
No, there isn't, I don't believe.
Richard,
Ah, that makes sense... So the release version literal is specified not
in the pom but via the prompt from running "mvn release:prepare" during the
release process. I was confused but now I think I'm clear.
Thanks,
ken
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> Ken,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159116#comment-13159116
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3246:
I've already done this in my sandbox area
Well, the old annotations could also be improved so that FELIX-2892
and the (probably duplicate) FELIX-3187 could be resolved.
These issue would need changing the retention level and adding the
bind-methods in the bytecode instead of in the java source.
Reto
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Cars
Ken,
Just an FYI, generally you keep the development version odd in the pom
(e.g., 0.1.1-SNAPSHOT) and then when you use maven to release it you
change it to even during the release process (e.g., 0.1.2). So that way
there is never a development build of the even version ever (i.e.,
0.1.2-SNA
On 28 Nov 2011, at 17:31, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We solved 17 issues in this release:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/sr/jira.issueviews:searchrequest-printable/temp/SearchRequest.html?jqlQuery=project+%3D+FELIX+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%22maven-bundle-plugin-2.3.6%22
>
> Ther
On 25 Nov 2011, at 14:35, Ge@@ru wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i don't know if this is an issue or is correct.
>
> When it is create an osgi bundle with blueprint and service use property
> like this example:
>
> xmlns="http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0";
>
> xmlns:cm="http://aries.apache.org/
Just:
- ran script successfully (all good)
- rebuilt and ran tests in Pax Exam using that bundle plugin. all good!
So,
+1 from here (non binding)
Thanks a lot, Stuart !!
Toni
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We solved 17 issues in this release:
>
>
> ht
Hi folks,
We solved 17 issues in this release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/sr/jira.issueviews:searchrequest-printable/temp/SearchRequest.html?jqlQuery=project+%3D+FELIX+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%22maven-bundle-plugin-2.3.6%22
There are still some outstanding issues:
https://issues.apache.or
Display maven information for a bundle
--
Key: FELIX-3248
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3248
Project: Felix
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Web Console
Affects Versions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13158527#comment-13158527
]
Steven E. Harris commented on FELIX-2950:
-
The work introduces type parameters to
Change annotation retention from source to class
Key: FELIX-3247
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3247
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Maven SCR Pl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13158522#comment-13158522
]
Reto Bachmann-Gmür commented on FELIX-3187:
---
I think this is a duplicate of FELI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13158520#comment-13158520
]
Reto Bachmann-Gmür commented on FELIX-2892:
---
If the retention level is CLASS and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13158515#comment-13158515
]
Stuart McCulloch commented on FELIX-3206:
-
Deployed new snapshot for testing:
htt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stuart McCulloch resolved FELIX-3206.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved in r1207309, reverted to old behaviour of generating the manif
2011/11/28 Bertrand Delacretaz :
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>> ...Going forward I see the following changes, we might want to apply to the
>> SCR plugin:...
>
>> ...* Add support for the new OSGi standard annotations, of course.
>>
>> * Consider supportig mixing F
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> +1 these were exactly my plans :) especially changing the retention
> level to class file will allow us better tooling support (like using
> an annotation processor which could be triggered from an ide as well)
> and we can finally drop qdo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13158491#comment-13158491
]
David Bosschaert commented on FELIX-3238:
-
Thanks Stuart and Peter for your help.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stuart McCulloch resolved FELIX-3208.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: maven-bundle-plugin-2.3.6
Fixed in r1207274, we n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stuart McCulloch resolved FELIX-3238.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: maven-bundle-plugin-2.3.6
> Unable to filter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stuart McCulloch reassigned FELIX-3238:
---
Assignee: Stuart McCulloch
> Unable to filter out classes from identical package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13158471#comment-13158471
]
Stuart McCulloch commented on FELIX-3238:
-
BTW, the reason why the split-package d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13158466#comment-13158466
]
Thomas Diesler commented on FELIX-3246:
---
I'm looking into this building on top of
h
[Framework] Use OBR Resolver API in standalone resolver module
--
Key: FELIX-3246
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3246
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Task
Com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13158463#comment-13158463
]
Thomas Diesler commented on FELIX-2038:
---
I separated the resolver into its own modul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bram de Kruijff updated FELIX-3245:
---
Attachment: autoconf_Cardinality.patch
> Autoconf handles metatype 1.1 cardinalty wrong
>
Autoconf handles metatype 1.1 cardinalty wrong
--
Key: FELIX-3245
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3245
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Deployment Admin
Aff
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> ...Going forward I see the following changes, we might want to apply to the
> SCR plugin:...
> ...* Add support for the new OSGi standard annotations, of course.
>
> * Consider supportig mixing Felix and standard annotations in the same
37 matches
Mail list logo
