On 1/4/12 13:33 , Marcel Offermans wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 19:10 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
On 1/4/12 13:06 , Marcel Offermans wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 15:13 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
On 1/4/12 07:44 , Felix Meschberger wrote:
Am 04.01.2012 um 13:39 schrieb Marcel Offermans:
It would be
On Jan 4, 2012, at 19:10 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> On 1/4/12 13:06 , Marcel Offermans wrote:
>> On Jan 4, 2012, at 15:13 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>> On 1/4/12 07:44 , Felix Meschberger wrote:
Am 04.01.2012 um 13:39 schrieb Marcel Offermans:
> It would be nice to learn how they intend
On 1/4/12 13:06 , Marcel Offermans wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 15:13 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
On 1/4/12 07:44 , Felix Meschberger wrote:
Am 04.01.2012 um 13:39 schrieb Marcel Offermans:
It would be nice to learn how they intend to solve this issue before we do,
because it probably makes sense
On Jan 4, 2012, at 15:13 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> On 1/4/12 07:44 , Felix Meschberger wrote:
>> Am 04.01.2012 um 13:39 schrieb Marcel Offermans:
>>> It would be nice to learn how they intend to solve this issue before we do,
>>> because it probably makes sense to align our decision with theirs
file install dependencies on osgi artifacts should have "provided" scope
Key: FELIX-3294
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3294
Project: Felix
Issue Type
Good point Carsten,
Nexus doesn't seem to know me at all, and when I try "forgot password"
and enter my apache id and email, it says "Invalid Username".
With whom should I request access?
-arjun
On 01/04/2012 05:28 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
I just tested today and it worked for me.
Hi,
I just tested today and it worked for me. Your settings look fine to
me. Maybe you need to be added to the Nexus instance in order to be
able to deploy to the staging repository?
Arjun, can you test logging into repository.apache.org (with your
apache credentials) and then look if you see the
On 1/4/12 07:44 , Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
Am 04.01.2012 um 13:39 schrieb Marcel Offermans:
It would be nice to learn how they intend to solve this issue before we do,
because it probably makes sense to align our decision with theirs.
They will create two builds. This would be my option (
Felix I am very happy and proud to help
Kind regards
Jerome
Envoyé avec BlackBerry® d'Orange
-Original Message-
From: Felix Meschberger
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:58:30
To: dev@felix.apache.org
Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org
Subject: Re: [WebConsole] Dropping 1.4 builds ?
Hi
Hi Jerome,
Thanks for your elaborate answer. This is exactly the kind of feedback, I was
trying to get.
Regards
Felix
Am 04.01.2012 um 13:24 schrieb jerome moliere:
> Hi Felix and other Felix members,
> the following is just the expression of my personal experience nothing
> more
> i am w
Hi,
Am 04.01.2012 um 13:55 schrieb Marcel Offermans:
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 13:44 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>
>> Am 04.01.2012 um 13:39 schrieb Marcel Offermans:
>>> It would be nice to learn how they intend to solve this issue before we do,
>>> because it probably makes sense to align our dec
On Jan 4, 2012, at 13:44 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Am 04.01.2012 um 13:39 schrieb Marcel Offermans:
>> It would be nice to learn how they intend to solve this issue before we do,
>> because it probably makes sense to align our decision with theirs.
>
> They will create two builds. This woul
Sounds very wise Marcel
I guess that we (you) could examine another way with a branch using
old source style (with may be less features ?) but it raises all
maintenance problems that everybody knows ...
jerome
J.MOLIERE - Mentor/J
auteur Eyrolles
blog: http://romjethoughts.blogspot.com
Hi,
Am 04.01.2012 um 13:39 schrieb Marcel Offermans:
> It would be nice to learn how they intend to solve this issue before we do,
> because it probably makes sense to align our decision with theirs.
They will create two builds. This would be my option (c).
Regards
Felix
On Jan 4, 2012, at 13:16 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> I recently converted the Web Console code to use Generics and added the
> target jsr14 flag for the compiler to build Java 1.4 compatible class files.
> All fine and well.
>
> until ... JDK 7 comes along ...
>
> I just learned that the JD
Hi Felix and other Felix members,
the following is just the expression of my personal experience nothing more
i am working on a project where part from the application runs on
embedded device with a J9 1.4.2 like JVM and WebConsole is the only
way to get some valuable information about the appl
Hi,
I recently converted the Web Console code to use Generics and added the target
jsr14 flag for the compiler to build Java 1.4 compatible class files. All fine
and well.
until ... JDK 7 comes along ...
I just learned that the JDK 7 compiler does not support jsr14 compiled class
files any lo
Hi Ken,
No, I've tried again just now and keep getting the 401 error.
I don't know if others are still facing the same issue.
If it works for you let me know!
Thanks,
Arjun
On 01/04/2012 02:48 AM, Ken Gilmer wrote:
Sorry I can't provide any help in fixing this but am wondering...is it
working
18 matches
Mail list logo