[jira] [Created] (FELIX-3381) Support for {maven-test-resources} and {maven-test-sources} placeholders

2012-03-09 Thread Tuomas Kiviaho (Created) (JIRA)
Support for {maven-test-resources} and {maven-test-sources} placeholders Key: FELIX-3381 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3381 Project: Felix Issue Type

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-3377) Allow a component to update its own service properties

2012-03-09 Thread David Jencks (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13226576#comment-13226576 ] David Jencks commented on FELIX-3377: - I think this is a good idea. I'd like to make s

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-3380) minor javadoc corrections in @Temporal annotation

2012-03-09 Thread Clement Escoffier (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13226282#comment-13226282 ] Clement Escoffier commented on FELIX-3380: -- Patch applied un trunk. BTW, You don

[jira] [Updated] (FELIX-3380) minor javadoc corrections in @Temporal annotation

2012-03-09 Thread Clement Escoffier (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Clement Escoffier updated FELIX-3380: - Affects Version/s: iPOJO-1.8.0 Fix Version/s: ipojo-core-1.8.2 Assign

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-3380) minor javadoc corrections in @Temporal annotation

2012-03-09 Thread Clement Escoffier (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13226220#comment-13226220 ] Clement Escoffier commented on FELIX-3380: -- Hi, Your patch looks good. Will appl

[jira] [Updated] (FELIX-3380) minor javadoc corrections in @Temporal annotation

2012-03-09 Thread Reuben Garrett (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reuben Garrett updated FELIX-3380: -- Description: correct documented default for timeout from "true" to 3000 http://svn.apache.org/

Re: patching process for ultra-fine revisions

2012-03-09 Thread Reuben Garrett
i made a patch to practice. i'm not sure if JIRA has an indicator for "patch attached" or if it's hidden by my karma, not that it matters for this case. with time, i hope to bring more significant contributions. all the same, thanks for your time and guidance! https://issues.apache.org/jira/bro

[jira] [Created] (FELIX-3380) minor javadoc corrections in @Temporal annotation

2012-03-09 Thread Reuben Garrett (Created) (JIRA)
minor javadoc corrections in @Temporal annotation - Key: FELIX-3380 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3380 Project: Felix Issue Type: Bug Components: iPOJO

[jira] [Updated] (FELIX-3380) minor javadoc corrections in @Temporal annotation

2012-03-09 Thread Reuben Garrett (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reuben Garrett updated FELIX-3380: -- Attachment: FELIX-3380-1.diff patch > minor javadoc corrections in @Temporal a

Re: patching process for ultra-fine revisions

2012-03-09 Thread Richard S. Hall
p.s. I should add, it is not necessary to provide a real patch for really simple cases, if you can precisely describe it in the description...patches are just nice because they remove all doubt. On 3/9/12 11:25 , Reuben Garrett wrote: What's our normal process for submitting patches against ve

Re: patching process for ultra-fine revisions

2012-03-09 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Am 09.03.2012 um 08:25 schrieb Reuben Garrett: > What's our normal process for submitting patches against very small > sections of the code base (e.g. one-word javadoc corrections)? For > example, I noticed that the default timeout value for iPOJO's @Temporal > annotation [1] is javadoc'd as

Re: patching process for ultra-fine revisions

2012-03-09 Thread Richard S. Hall
You're over thinking it. :-) Opening an issue is probably the best way, since it enables a single work pattern for making sure things don't get lost. Don't worry about conserving bits. Besides, we feel really productive when we can resolve open issues... ;-) -> richard On 3/9/12 11:25 , Reu

patching process for ultra-fine revisions

2012-03-09 Thread Reuben Garrett
What's our normal process for submitting patches against very small sections of the code base (e.g. one-word javadoc corrections)? For example, I noticed that the default timeout value for iPOJO's @Temporal annotation [1] is javadoc'd as "true", but is actually a long with default 3000. It seems

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-3377) Allow a component to update its own service properties

2012-03-09 Thread Felix Meschberger (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13226146#comment-13226146 ] Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-3377: -- Thinking about it, I would like to re

[jira] [Closed] (FELIX-3379) Update extenderbased SimpleShapes example to create an embedded framework using org.osgi.framework.launch

2012-03-09 Thread Benedikt Ritter (Closed) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Benedikt Ritter closed FELIX-3379. -- Resolution: Fixed Thanks for reviewing. You can be sure, that I'll synchronize the examples. R