[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13255334#comment-13255334
]
Clement Escoffier commented on FELIX-3451:
--
Yes it is. Jira says it's the revisio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13255274#comment-13255274
]
Fabio Lattario Fonseca commented on FELIX-3451:
---
You have committed to the t
On Monday, April 16, 2012, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> On 4/16/12 15:49 , Lucas Galfaso wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> The latest draft of the spec (well, the one posted at osgi.org) does
>> not ask for the framework to be compiled for jsr14. Does this change
>> implies that Felix will change the target to 1.5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13255187#comment-13255187
]
Göktürk Gezer commented on FELIX-3461:
--
Oh no! the second way that i proposed in my c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13255015#comment-13255015
]
Göktürk Gezer commented on FELIX-3461:
--
Method was not implemented before, i override
On 4/16/12 15:49 , Lucas Galfaso wrote:
Hi,
The latest draft of the spec (well, the one posted at osgi.org) does
not ask for the framework to be compiled for jsr14. Does this change
implies that Felix will change the target to 1.5+? (BTW, I think Felix
should change this, but I do know this ca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13254998#comment-13254998
]
Guillaume Sauthier commented on FELIX-3461:
---
Why did you do some changes on Cons
Hi,
The latest draft of the spec (well, the one posted at osgi.org) does
not ask for the framework to be compiled for jsr14. Does this change
implies that Felix will change the target to 1.5+? (BTW, I think Felix
should change this, but I do know this can be one of those
controversial issues).
R
If I find the time, I'd like to update the framework to the R5 API...I
don't plan on implementing any of the features, just upgrading to the
latest API. (Of course, there aren't too many new features, just the
bundle collision hook, I think.) The main reason to do so, is so the
framework can st
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall closed FELIX-3465.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed the patch to both framework and resolver. This was a good catch. Th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-3465:
---
Component/s: Framework
Affects Version/s: framework-4.0.2
Fix Version/s: fra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall resolved FELIX-3397.
Resolution: Duplicate
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
Duplicates FELIX-3343.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall resolved FELIX-3343.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
I believe I have committed a fix for this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Watson updated FELIX-3465:
-
Attachment: 3465.txt
Possible fix. I simply checked if the resourcePkgMap already contains the
Multi root resolve operations may cause duplicate blame chains to be created
Key: FELIX-3465
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3465
Project: Felix
Is
Hi Thomas,
On Apr 16, 2012 7:16 PM, "Thomas Calmant" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not a Felix developer, but I'm also working on an integration of
> iPOJO in Eclipse.
> It seems that you manipulate the whole build directory each time,
> while you could bypass the problem by manipulating only re-compiled
Hi Clement,
On Apr 16, 2012 7:10 PM, "Clement Escoffier"
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We started looking at it. Guillaume did some work on it. So, first the
second evaluation of the annotations is definitely a bug. We're now trying
to be sure we're not breaking something somewhere (like the component
filte
Hi,
I'm not a Felix developer, but I'm also working on an integration of
iPOJO in Eclipse.
It seems that you manipulate the whole build directory each time,
while you could bypass the problem by manipulating only re-compiled
(fresh) class files, using a JDT compilation participant.
If you want to
Hi,
We started looking at it. Guillaume did some work on it. So, first the second
evaluation of the annotations is definitely a bug. We're now trying to be sure
we're not breaking something somewhere (like the component filter).
So you can be sure we will fix the issue. The patch or a slightly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall closed FELIX-3463.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Richard S. Hall
I've applied the patch.
> Mu
Hi Devs,
Sorry for pressuring but this is blocker for us in ApacheDS. Could some one
please evaluate the issue and the patch? We really need to know whether
it'll be fixed or not?
Thanks,
Gokturk
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As i was trying to integr
Raise exception when a Designate's OCDREF points to non-existing OCD
Key: FELIX-3464
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3464
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Watson updated FELIX-3463:
-
Attachment: 3463.txt
Possible fix.
> Multiple hosts for a fragment that exports
23 matches
Mail list logo
