Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Web Console 4.0.0 and plugins

+1 Carsten 2012/6/3 Jamie G. : > +1 (non-binding) > > Cheers, > Jamie > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am 01.06.2012 um 20:33 schrieb Richard S. Hall: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> No changelog in OBR plugin. >> >> Right. I added it after cutting the release. >> >> R

[jira] [Commented] (FELIX-3524) SCR configuration-pid from compendium 4.3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13288434#comment-13288434 ] Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-3524: -- > Let me know if you think more tests

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Web Console 4.0.0 and plugins

+1 regards, Karl On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > +1 > > Carsten > > 2012/6/3 Jamie G. : >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Cheers, >> Jamie >> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Am 01.06.2012 um 20:33 schrieb Richard S. Hall: >>> +

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Configuration Admin version 1.4.0

+1 regards, Karl On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Jamie G. wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > cheers, > Jamie > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am 01.06.2012 um 20:20 schrieb Richard S. Hall: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Not that it matters too much to me, but don't we n

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Configuration Admin version 1.4.0

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On 06/04/2012 11:06 AM, Karl Pauls wrote: +1 regards, Karl On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Jamie G. wrote: +1 (non-binding) cheers, Jamie On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: Hi, Am 01.06.2012 um 20:20 schrieb Richard S. Hall: +1 Not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Web Console 4.0.0 and plugins

+1 On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Karl Pauls wrote: > +1 > > regards, > > Karl > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Carsten Ziegeler > wrote: > > +1 > > > > Carsten > > > > 2012/6/3 Jamie G. : > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Jamie > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Felix Me

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Configuration Admin version 1.4.0

+1 On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Karl Pauls wrote: > +1 > > regards, > > Karl > > On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Jamie G. wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > cheers, > > Jamie > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Felix Meschberger > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Am 01.06.2012 um 20:20 schri

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Web Console 4.0.0 and plugins

+1, Regards, Clement Sent from my iPhone On 04.06.2012, at 13:48, Alex Karasulu wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Karl Pauls wrote: > >> +1 >> >> regards, >> >> Karl >> >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Carsten Ziegeler >> wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> Carsten >>> >>> 2012/6/

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Configuration Admin version 1.4.0

+1, Regards, Clement Sent from my iPhone On 04.06.2012, at 13:49, Alex Karasulu wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Karl Pauls wrote: > >> +1 >> >> regards, >> >> Karl >> >> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Jamie G. wrote: >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> cheers, >>> Jamie >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Web Console 4.0.0 and plugins

Hi +1 (non binding). Just a note which does not block the vote: I noticed that with httplite http service, I can't browse declarative service components, while it works ok with http.jetty service. When using httplite and webconsole 4.0.0, and when clicking on the "Components" menu, I then get th

[DS] [lifecycle methods returning service properties] How should this work?

cf FELIX-3506, 3377. Right now we have it set up so that a lifecycle method can return the exact set of service properties it wants the service registration to have. I'm not at all sure this is a plausible way to operate since usually you'd use this feature to set or unset a flag in the servic

Re: More DS concurrency problems

Hi, Smaller things first ... Will you create issues for them ? Am 03.06.2012 um 20:21 schrieb David Jencks: > In other DS issues: > > I'd like to separate the felix specific non-spec ComponentFactory behavior > (where it acts like a ManagedServiceFactory) into a separate class so I can > unde

Re: [DS] [lifecycle methods returning service properties] How should this work?

Hi, Am 04.06.2012 um 19:16 schrieb David Jencks: > cf FELIX-3506, 3377. > > Right now we have it set up so that a lifecycle method can return the exact > set of service properties it wants the service registration to have. I'm not > at all sure this is a plausible way to operate since usually

[jira] [Created] (FELIX-3533) Strip out . properties when a lifecycle method returns service properties

David Jencks created FELIX-3533: --- Summary: Strip out . properties when a lifecycle method returns service properties Key: FELIX-3533 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3533 Project: Felix

[jira] [Created] (FELIX-3534) ServiceFactory components don't deal with ConfigurationAdmin updates properly

David Jencks created FELIX-3534: --- Summary: ServiceFactory components don't deal with ConfigurationAdmin updates properly Key: FELIX-3534 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3534 Project: Fe

[jira] [Created] (FELIX-3535) Minor DS cleanup fixes

David Jencks created FELIX-3535: --- Summary: Minor DS cleanup fixes Key: FELIX-3535 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3535 Project: Felix Issue Type: Bug Components: Decl

[jira] [Resolved] (FELIX-3533) Strip out . properties when a lifecycle method returns service properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks resolved FELIX-3533. - Resolution: Fixed Filter out private . properties, and test that it works. > Str

[jira] [Assigned] (FELIX-3533) Strip out . properties when a lifecycle method returns service properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks reassigned FELIX-3533: --- Assignee: David Jencks > Strip out . properties when a lifecycle method returns service p

[jira] [Assigned] (FELIX-3535) Minor DS cleanup fixes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks reassigned FELIX-3535: --- Assignee: David Jencks > Minor DS cleanup fixes > -- > >

[jira] [Assigned] (FELIX-3534) ServiceFactory components don't deal with ConfigurationAdmin updates properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks reassigned FELIX-3534: --- Assignee: David Jencks > ServiceFactory components don't deal with ConfigurationAdmin upd

Re: [DS] [lifecycle methods returning service properties] How should this work?

On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:13 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi, > > Am 04.06.2012 um 19:16 schrieb David Jencks: > >> cf FELIX-3506, 3377. >> >> Right now we have it set up so that a lifecycle method can return the exact >> set of service properties it wants the service registration to have. I'm

[jira] [Created] (FELIX-3536) Consider putting the non-spec ComponentFactory behavior in a separate class

David Jencks created FELIX-3536: --- Summary: Consider putting the non-spec ComponentFactory behavior in a separate class Key: FELIX-3536 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3536 Project: Feli

[jira] [Updated] (FELIX-3536) Consider putting the non-spec ComponentFactory behavior in a separate class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks updated FELIX-3536: Attachment: FELIX-3536.diff Suggestion on how to split spec and non-spec behavior to make it cleare

Re: More DS concurrency problems

On Jun 4, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi, > > Smaller things first ... good idea :-) > Will you create issues for them ? > > Am 03.06.2012 um 20:21 schrieb David Jencks: > >> In other DS issues: >> >> I'd like to separate the felix specific non-spec ComponentFactory behavi