[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13590307#comment-13590307
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-3917:
--
Can you elaborate on what the problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler resolved FELIX-3943.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Maven Plugin should require latest SCR annotations
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler resolved FELIX-3942.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> IT Tests should use newer version of annotations
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler resolved FELIX-3941.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Dependency to annotations should not be in the plugin
> -
Carsten Ziegeler created FELIX-3943:
---
Summary: Maven Plugin should require latest SCR annotations
Key: FELIX-3943
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3943
Project: Felix
Issue
Carsten Ziegeler created FELIX-3942:
---
Summary: IT Tests should use newer version of annotations
Key: FELIX-3942
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3942
Project: Felix
Issue Ty
Carsten Ziegeler created FELIX-3941:
---
Summary: Dependency to annotations should not be in the plugin
Key: FELIX-3941
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3941
Project: Felix
Iss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler resolved FELIX-3940.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Abstract class is not detected
> --
>
Carsten Ziegeler created FELIX-3940:
---
Summary: Abstract class is not detected
Key: FELIX-3940
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3940
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler updated FELIX-3917:
Summary: bind/unbind methods are not generated (was: Potential NPE if
bind/unbind method c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tuomas Kiviaho updated FELIX-3912:
--
Description:
I've got a case (JUnit tests) where static field injections and callback
invocati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13590281#comment-13590281
]
Tuomas Kiviaho commented on FELIX-3912:
---
Yes I think it would work but I like to cov
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589884#comment-13589884
]
Jad Naous commented on FELIX-3907:
--
Thanks for the clarifications!
> Nul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-3907:
---
Fix Version/s: framework-4.4.0
> NullPointerException in BundleWiringImpl when m_disposed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589880#comment-13589880
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3907:
The degree of "closeness" just depends on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589838#comment-13589838
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-3914:
-
The improvement makes a lot of sense to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589834#comment-13589834
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-3912:
-
Just to make sure, do you really need t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589833#comment-13589833
]
Jad Naous commented on FELIX-3907:
--
Agreed, we should not hold onto to classes and we kno
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589829#comment-13589829
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-3909:
-
You don't happen to have a test case fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589825#comment-13589825
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-3910:
-
I quickly glanced over the patch. I am
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589801#comment-13589801
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3907:
We could create an internal method that c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall resolved FELIX-3939.
Resolution: Fixed
I've committed a patch and will deploy snapshots. I didn't bother logging
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589768#comment-13589768
]
Jad Naous commented on FELIX-3907:
--
I see. Would it be difficult to make it such that thi
On 28 Feb 2013, at 18:18, Ferry Huberts wrote:
> On 28/02/13 19:08, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
>> On 28 Feb 2013, at 17:55, Ferry Huberts wrote:
>>> On 28/02/13 18:29, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
On 28 Feb 2013, at 17:04, Sahoo wrote:
> On Thursday 28 February 2013 10:18 PM, Stuart McCulloc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clement Escoffier resolved FELIX-3881.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in trunk. Please close if it's ok for you.
> i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589755#comment-13589755
]
Sahoo commented on FELIX-3939:
--
I agree. Perhaps we should log the exception in FINE level -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589751#comment-13589751
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3907:
Even if we allowed the class loader to re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589747#comment-13589747
]
Jad Naous commented on FELIX-3907:
--
Unfortunately, I think a CNFE can be just as (if not
On 28/02/13 19:08, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
On 28 Feb 2013, at 17:55, Ferry Huberts wrote:
On 28/02/13 18:29, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
On 28 Feb 2013, at 17:04, Sahoo wrote:
On Thursday 28 February 2013 10:18 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Except that having OSGi packaging supported in Maven
ou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589745#comment-13589745
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3939:
I think what we can do in this instance i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-3939:
---
Fix Version/s: framework-4.4.0
> IllegalArgumentException from ClassLoader.definePackage
On 28 Feb 2013, at 17:55, Ferry Huberts wrote:
> On 28/02/13 18:29, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
>> On 28 Feb 2013, at 17:04, Sahoo wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday 28 February 2013 10:18 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Except that having OSGi packaging supported in Maven
out-of-the-box could be worth a
On 28/02/13 18:29, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
On 28 Feb 2013, at 17:04, Sahoo wrote:
On Thursday 28 February 2013 10:18 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Except that having OSGi packaging supported in Maven
out-of-the-box could be worth any short-term confusion,
I don't understand this limitation. W
On 28 Feb 2013, at 17:04, Sahoo wrote:
> On Thursday 28 February 2013 10:18 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
>> Except that having OSGi packaging supported in Maven out-of-the-box could be
>> worth any short-term confusion,
> I don't understand this limitation. Why is it that an extension that support
On Thursday 28 February 2013 10:18 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Except that having OSGi packaging supported in Maven out-of-the-box could be
worth any short-term confusion,
I don't understand this limitation. Why is it that an extension that
supports bundle project type be generated from Maven p
On 28 Feb 2013, at 16:30, Sahoo wrote:
> Again any change that causes pain to our users should be avoided. We don't
> want any negative publicity about our stuff no matter how trivial they are.
> Imagine someone doing a google search and finding two different plugin
> coordinates. It does not h
On 2/28/13 11:32, Sahoo wrote:
I am forgetting how to fix JIRA. If you know, please do it.
You just need to go under versions and manage them, then find the
version and release it...
I did it, so it should come up as released now.
-> richard
Thanks,
Sahoo
I am forgetting how to fix JIRA. If you know, please do it.
Thanks,
Sahoo
Again any change that causes pain to our users should be avoided. We
don't want any negative publicity about our stuff no matter how trivial
they are. Imagine someone doing a google search and finding two
different plugin coordinates. It does not help a new comer and that's
where we have been s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589634#comment-13589634
]
Sahoo commented on FELIX-3553:
--
Opened Felix-3939. Thanks.
> Use of paralle
Sahoo created FELIX-3939:
Summary: IllegalArgumentException from ClassLoader.definePackage
Key: FELIX-3939
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3939
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clement Escoffier updated FELIX-3938:
-
Fix Version/s: ipojo-manipulator-1.8.8
Assignee: Guillaume Sauthier
A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589575#comment-13589575
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3907:
Yes, I think this is essentially a race c
Issac Garcia created FELIX-3938:
---
Summary: maven-ipojo-plugin does not behave as bnd-ipojo-plugin
Key: FELIX-3938
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3938
Project: Felix
Issue Type
I am fine with this option as well.
-> richard
On 2/28/13 08:35 , Stuart McCulloch wrote:
During the "[DISCUSS] rename maven-bundle-plugin to bnd-maven-plugin" thread
Marcel and Guillaume came up with counter-suggestions involving contributing the
maven-bundle-plugin to Apache Maven.
This id
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589551#comment-13589551
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3553:
Yes, it could be. Although definePackage(
On 28 Feb 2013, at 13:40, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I find this an intriguing idea and would really position creating OSGi
> bundles as a first-class job of build Java modules.
>
> Stuart, I assume you are a maven committer, so you continuing to maintain the
> plugin would be possible
Hi,
I find this an intriguing idea and would really position creating OSGi bundles
as a first-class job of build Java modules.
Stuart, I assume you are a maven committer, so you continuing to maintain the
plugin would be possible ? It would be a shame if we contribute the plugin to
maven and i
During the "[DISCUSS] rename maven-bundle-plugin to bnd-maven-plugin" thread
Marcel and Guillaume came up with counter-suggestions involving contributing
the maven-bundle-plugin to Apache Maven.
This idea has certain advantages - the plugin name would not be an issue
(assuming the Maven team we
On 28 Feb 2013, at 07:54, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for the heads up and thanks for your work you put into this. This is
> really appreciated and the also community wise the plugin is really a key in
> the OSGi tooling.
>
> Having said that I appreciate the desire to align with
On 28 Feb 2013, at 07:43, Sahoo wrote:
> Stuart,
>
> I really appreciate all the effort you put in to make this plugin so great.
> But, I am afraid, I can't support the renaming. It is going to frustrate
> developers already frustrated with lack of good OSGi tools.
> maven-bundle-plugin works
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chetan Mehrotra updated FELIX-3935:
---
Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
> Add testcases for validating the JAAS Feature implementation
I agree with the following very much!
>That we use bndlib internally is a good (and the right) thing but it
is >just that: an implementation detail.
Thanks
--Tang
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the heads up and thanks for your work you put into this. This is
really appreciated and
53 matches
Mail list logo
