[jira] [Created] (FELIX-4286) [DS] improve some now-misleading class names

David Jencks created FELIX-4286: --- Summary: [DS] improve some now-misleading class names Key: FELIX-4286 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4286 Project: Felix Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Closed] (FELIX-3850) org.osgi.framework.ServiceException: Service factory returned null.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks closed FELIX-3850. --- > org.osgi.framework.ServiceException: Service factory returned null. > -

[jira] [Resolved] (FELIX-3850) org.osgi.framework.ServiceException: Service factory returned null.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks resolved FELIX-3850. - Resolution: Incomplete Not enough information to do anything > org.osgi.framework.ServiceExcepti

Re: Why DependencyManager rather than DS?

Hello David, Sit down first, this is a long mail. :) On Oct 16, 2013, at 1:06 AM, David Jencks wrote: > On Oct 15, 2013, at 1:33 PM, Marcel Offermans > wrote: >> On Oct 15, 2013, at 19:51 PM, David Jencks wrote: >> DS still can't do dynamic dependencies, nor is it extensible to support new

Re: [DS] Improving class names

Hi David Makes sense to me. Regards Felix Am 16.10.2013 um 09:32 schrieb David Jencks: > Hi, > > Several of the fundamental class names in DS no longer fit the purpose of the > classes and I'd like to rename them to be less misleading before the next > release. Since I don't always come up

[DS] Improving class names

Hi, Several of the fundamental class names in DS no longer fit the purpose of the classes and I'd like to rename them to be less misleading before the next release. Since I don't always come up with comprehensible names I'm asking for advice. Here's what I have so far: DelayedComponentManage