I updated the implementation in my sandbox to the latest interfaces.
I guess I'll have to try them with Atomos next :-)
regards,
Karl
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:25 PM Karl Pauls wrote:
>
> I have an implementation based on the original interfaces in my sandbox.
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/a
Definitely +1 for me.
Regards
JB
On 23/01/2020 16:08, Thomas Watson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The OSGI R8 Core specification is currently being worked on by the OSGi
> Alliance. One of the proposals is to add something called OSGi Connect to
> the Core Framework specification [1] [2].
>
> This specific
thanks Karl, Thomas for the clarifications, I'll give a try.
regards
Pierre
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 5:55 PM Thomas Watson wrote:
> The idea for OSGi Connect specification is that the Framework itself does
> not need to support Graal native image bundles. However, something like
> Atomos which p
The idea for OSGi Connect specification is that the Framework itself does
not need to support Graal native image bundles. However, something like
Atomos which provides a ConnectFramework to launch a Framework
implementation with can support loading bundles from a Graal native image.
But that also
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 5:42 PM Pierre De Rop wrote:
>
> +1 from me as well.
>
> I'm also very interested.
> I did not know that Karl also worked on implementing the OSGi Connect RFC.
Well, Tom and I sort of started it together and the initial interfaces
actually are from Felix.
> Karl, will it
+1 from me as well.
I'm also very interested.
I did not know that Karl also worked on implementing the OSGi Connect RFC.
Karl, will it also support class loading from a Graal Substrate native
image environment ?
I ask this because I'm currently trying to adapt the Felix Connect ([1])
for the suppo
Sounds reasonable to me.
-> richard
On 1/23/20 10:08 AM, Thomas Watson wrote:
Hi,
The OSGI R8 Core specification is currently being worked on by the OSGi
Alliance. One of the proposals is to add something called OSGi Connect to
the Core Framework specification [1] [2].
This specification tak
+1 from me to the contribution.
Cheers,
David
On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 15:26, Karl Pauls wrote:
> I have an implementation based on the original interfaces in my sandbox.
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/sandbox/pauls/connect/
>
> It needs to be updated to the new interfaces which shoul
I have an implementation based on the original interfaces in my sandbox.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/sandbox/pauls/connect/
It needs to be updated to the new interfaces which shouldn't be too
hard. I should have that done soon.
regards,
Karl
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:23 PM Carsten
I agree, this would be a very good thing.
Neil
On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 15:21, Raymond Auge wrote:
> Great idea!
>
> +1
>
> - Ray
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 10:09 AM Thomas Watson wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The OSGI R8 Core specification is currently being worked on by the OSGi
> > Alliance. One
Hi Tom,
sounds great to me.
Afaik, the Felix framework does currently not implement OSGi connect. I
guess in order to experience atomos with the Felix framework this work
would need to be done as well. Are there any plans?
Regards
Carsten
On 23.01.2020 16:08, Thomas Watson wrote:
Hi,
The
Great idea!
+1
- Ray
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 10:09 AM Thomas Watson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The OSGI R8 Core specification is currently being worked on by the OSGi
> Alliance. One of the proposals is to add something called OSGi Connect to
> the Core Framework specification [1] [2].
>
> This specifi
Hi,
The OSGI R8 Core specification is currently being worked on by the OSGi
Alliance. One of the proposals is to add something called OSGi Connect to
the Core Framework specification [1] [2].
This specification takes much of its initial inspiration from the current
Felix Connect/PojoSR project.
13 matches
Mail list logo
