Hi,
On 8 Jul 2008, at 19:19, Dieter Wimberger wrote:
I guess that 7.0 is the output from the felix classloader. When
allowing parent delegation (what Sahoo suggested), then you get the
result you were looking for.
The 7.0 is indeed the name of the classloader of bundle ID 7 (the 0 is
the
+1
Looks good to me, actually fixes a bug we ran into hours after this vote
going up. Kudos for the negative response time!
Angelo
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> Am 20.11.2011 um 22:08 schrieb Karl Pauls:
>
> > I would like to call a vote
Looking good!
+1
Angelo
On Aug 3, 2012, at 6:37 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> On 3 Aug 2012, at 16:57, Marcel Offermans wrote:
>
>> A little while ago, Jan Willem Janssen donated a complete implementation of
>> the UserAdmin compendium service [1] to our project. I would like to start a
>> fo
+1 (very non-authoritive)
We checked the new release against our OSGi testing framework
(http://opensource.luminis.net/wiki/display/OSGITEST/OSGi+testing+framework
), and found nothing bad.
It's a shame about the new OSGi-provided filter implementation, by the
way...
Angelo
On 7 Sep 2009
On Sep 9, 2009, at 7:00 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
On 9/9/09 12:54, Angelo van der Sijpt wrote:
+1 (very non-authoritive)
We checked the new release against our OSGi testing framework
(http://opensource.luminis.net/wiki/display/OSGITEST/OSGi+testing+framework
), and found nothing bad
On 9 Sep 2009, at 20:38, Karl Pauls wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Angelo van der
> Sijpt wrote:
>> +1 (very non-authoritive)
>>
>> We checked the new release against our OSGi testing framework
>> (http://opensource.luminis.net/wiki/display/OSGITEST/OSG
On Sep 9, 2009, at 8:02 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
2009/9/10 Angelo van der Sijpt
On Sep 9, 2009, at 7:00 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
On 9/9/09 12:54, Angelo van der Sijpt wrote:
+1 (very non-authoritive)
We checked the new release against our OSGi testing framework (
http
Hi Marcel,
No bugs for me, and I am rather excited about the upcoming indexing.
Will this be in as an official feature in this release? If so, I will see to it
that I update the documentation around that (as I promised) as soon as possible.
Angelo
On Jan 18, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Marcel Offermans
Hi,
Over the past few days, I have been updating the documentation for filter
indices. If you agree, could you commit that for me?
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3856 .
Thanks!
Angelo
On Jan 23, 2013, at 2:05 PM, Pierre De Rop wrote:
> Hello Marcel,
>
> I have finished to c
+1 (extremely non-binding)
I verified it with an Android project with lots of services, and the indexing
speedup is significant.
Angelo
On Jan 24, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Marcel Offermans <
> marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl> wrote:
>
+1
Nice one!
On 11 Mar 2014, at 15:29, Marcel Offermans wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mar 5, 2014 3:49 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Karl Pauls is willing to donate PojoSR (https://code.google.com/p/pojosr/)
> to Felix.
>
> This vote is about officially accepting the donation.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept PojoSR
Components: Preferences Service
Reporter: Angelo van der Sijpt
When a Preferences object has been obtained for a given user, it can be removed
using removeNode(). A following call to getUserPreferences(...) will then
return the old, now invalid, Preferences object, leading
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Angelo van der Sijpt updated FELIX-609:
---
Description:
When a Preferences object has been obtained for a given user, it can be
Components: Framework
Affects Versions: felix-1.4.1
Reporter: Angelo van der Sijpt
Priority: Minor
When calling getBundle(clazz) on the PackageAdmin with a class from one of the
system packages, the system bundle should be returned. In stead, PackageAdmin
now returns
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Angelo van der Sijpt closed FELIX-609.
--
It has been a while, but yes, the trunk behavior is now OK.
> PreferencesService mi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Angelo van der Sijpt closed FELIX-915.
--
Working correctly now, thanks!
> PackageAdmin returns null on getBundle(...) with sys
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Configuration Admin
Affects Versions: configadmin-1.0.8
Reporter: Angelo van der Sijpt
Priority: Minor
When the update of a ManagedServiceFactoryConfiguration, and the registration
of that ManagedServiceFactory are close together or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Angelo van der Sijpt updated FELIX-1146:
Attachment: ActivatorWithDependencyManager.java
Activator.java
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12747313#action_12747313
]
Angelo van der Sijpt commented on FELIX-1146:
-
I have not been abl
Reporter: Angelo van der Sijpt
The preferences admin throws a ClassCastException when writing its cache. The
exception is
java.lang.ClassCastException: [Lorg.apache.felix.prefs.PreferencesImpl; cannot
be cast to org.apache.felix.prefs.PreferencesImpl
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Angelo van der Sijpt closed FELIX-411.
--
Works like a charm. Thanks!
Angelo
> Preferences service throws ClassCastExcept
Reporter: Angelo van der Sijpt
FilterImpl.toString() is not a complete representation of the filter string
that was used to create it: four characters ( '(', ')', '/' and '*' ) should be
preceded by a '\' if they are to be u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Angelo van der Sijpt updated FELIX-471:
---
Attachment: FELIX-471.patch
> FilterImpl.toString() does not add escape charact
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Angelo van der Sijpt closed FELIX-471.
--
> FilterImpl.toString() does not add escape charact
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12562403#action_12562403
]
Angelo van der Sijpt commented on FELIX-471:
Works fine, th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14184461#comment-14184461
]
Angelo van der Sijpt commented on FELIX-4168:
-
Fine with me, th
Angelo van der Sijpt created FELIX-3856:
---
Summary: Provide documentation for filter indices
Key: FELIX-3856
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3856
Project: Felix
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Angelo van der Sijpt updated FELIX-3856:
Attachment: FELIX-3856-Filter-indices-documentation.patch
This patch contains the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13558350#comment-13558350
]
Angelo van der Sijpt commented on FELIX-3856:
-
I know of their existence,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Angelo van der Sijpt updated FELIX-3856:
Attachment: Felix-3856-Filter-indices-for-aspects-and-adapters.patch
Added a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574360#comment-13574360
]
Angelo van der Sijpt commented on FELIX-3856:
-
I've noticed the cha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574501#comment-13574501
]
Angelo van der Sijpt commented on FELIX-3856:
-
Right,
Angelo van der Sijpt created FELIX-3913:
---
Summary: Felix Event Admin documentation does not state its
configuration PID
Key: FELIX-3913
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3913
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Angelo van der Sijpt updated FELIX-3913:
Attachment:
FELIX-3913-Included-the-Event-Admin-PID-in-its-documentation.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Angelo van der Sijpt closed FELIX-3913.
---
Right, the PID looks okay.
However, did you notice there is still some work to be done
Angelo van der Sijpt created FELIX-4168:
---
Summary: Adapter services don't call callbacks for existing
services when adding a required dependency after setup
Key: FELIX-4168
URL: https://issues.apach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Angelo van der Sijpt updated FELIX-4168:
Attachment: FELIX_4168AdapterWithDynamicallyAddedDependencies.java
I added a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13710852#comment-13710852
]
Angelo van der Sijpt commented on FELIX-4168:
-
Your comment makes a lo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13712099#comment-13712099
]
Angelo van der Sijpt commented on FELIX-4168:
-
I agree that some additi
: Deployment Admin
Affects Versions: deploymentadmin-0.9.0
Reporter: Angelo van der Sijpt
DeploymentAdmin is built in such a way, that a deployment package is
self-contained. However, in my case, I want to use a ResourceProcessor that is
already on the system to process a configuration
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Angelo van der Sijpt updated FELIX-3272:
Attachment: FELIX-3272.patch
Patch implementing the proposed solution
: Deployment Admin
Reporter: Angelo van der Sijpt
When resources are being handled by ResourceProcessors, the dropped() method is
always called for resources that were present in a previous deployment package.
This should _only_ happen if the resources is no longer present in the current
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Angelo van der Sijpt closed FELIX-3272.
---
Looks just like my patch, thanks!
> Add property to allow fore
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Angelo van der Sijpt closed FELIX-3313.
---
Resolution: Invalid
Turns out this behavior is not caused by the way the
Components: Deployment Admin
Affects Versions: deploymentadmin-0.9.0
Reporter: Angelo van der Sijpt
Deployment Admin's installation process is according to spec, which means that
stale resources processors will never be removed ( see
https://www.osgi.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
45 matches
Mail list logo
