Hey Richard,
I hope it's not too late for me to congratulate you as well! I've been
"away" from this ML since I've taken up a new job (in a new country too) as
well. But it's time to get back into the groove...
Best regards.
Rick Litton
- Original M
BJ Hargrave wrote:
> It is not part of the framework package, but it is a key class to use
for
> services. Perhaps OSGi should consider moving it from Compendium to
Core
> spec?
+1
Rick Litton
-Original Message-
From: BJ Hargrave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesda
are the gods of the network universe' (could be me).
Rick Litton
-Original Message-
From: Richard S. Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 3:14 PM
To: dev@felix.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (FELIX-285) Make resolver more robust
On May 21, 2007
From: Richard S. Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 2:56 PM
To: dev@felix.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (FELIX-285) Make resolver more robust
On May 21, 2007, at 5:50 PM, Rick Litton wrote:
> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>
>> But, ultimately, the
to wonder
why their systems appeared incomplete. I wonder if anyone has found a
workaround to this restriction. I realize too that it is a "ui thing"
which certainly can be masked...or nothing that creating a new profile
will not solve.
Rick Litton
-Original Message-
From: Richard
ring of the bundle ids?
I am not sure what you are talking about.
-> richard
Thanks.
Rick Litton
- Original Message - From: "Richard S. Hall"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2007 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (FELIX-285) Make resolver more
ocess, please report
them.
If I recall correctly, it stopped all the bundles hence, my impression it
stopped the framework. I think this action is also valid after reading the
specs. However, I will try to reproduce it...
P.S. Any solution to re-ordering of the bundle ids?
Thanks.
Rick L
ld one. This sequence may not be
exactly correct as I don't have the code in front of me. The other issue I
have was the re-ordering of the bundle-id's after bundles have been removed.
But this perhaps requires another discussion thread...
Rick Litton
- Original Message
Of course, we would prefer to have both (backend
Felix and FE app server) on a single JVM which is the most ideal
scenario...
Rick Litton
-Original Message-
From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 1:20 PM
To: dev@felix.apache.org
Subject: Re: Usin
Oops... my earlier response was for R3. For R4, I had to set the
following in config.properties:
#
# JNDI properties.
#
java.naming.provider.url=localhost:1099
java.naming.factory.initial=org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContextFactory
java.naming.factory.url.pkgs=org.jboss.naming
Rick Litton
y *normal*
bundle.
Rick Litton
-Original Message-
From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 12:53 PM
To: dev@felix.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using felix on the server side
Using a service may not always work.
For example the RMI JMX connector will access the
using the concepts defined for
OBR2...
Yes, and it works very neatly too. I was thinking of the same thing for
JSR-124 which could be in the same lab if one is set up.
Regards.
Rick Litton
-Original Message-
From: Richard S. Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 2:
e" locally installed bundles.
Rick Litton
-Original Message-
From: Richard S. Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 2:26 PM
To: dev@felix.apache.org
Subject: Re: Support for Fragment Bundles
Rick Litton wrote:
> Is there any plan to support fragment bundles (3
Is there any plan to support fragment bundles (3.14 of R4) soon in
Felix? I noticed that an issue has been opened -- FELIX-29 -- but no
work seems to have been done on it yet. Is there any reason or concern
why it is being postponed? Thanks.
Rick Litton
14 matches
Mail list logo
