On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi Carsten,
>
> Definitely +1
>
> Experience from past ApacheCon shows, that the OSGi BOF was very well
> welcomed.
definitely +1
it'd be great to do some sort of distributed BOF with ad hoc groups
hooking up over the internet (but i'm n
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Yeah, I really like the idea of an append flag to propset.
cool
i've submitted a patch
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1206) for this and also
one (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1207) to add some
ignores
- robert
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated FELIX-1207:
-
Attachment: karaf-maven-eclipse.patch
This patch ignores the files generated by
Reporter: Robert Burrell Donkin
The maven eclipse plugin is a very useful way to generate a project.
Unfortunately, it creates a lot of files which are not currently ignored by
subversion.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated FELIX-1206:
-
Attachment: karaf-propadded.patch
> [PATCH] config/propapp
Reporter: Robert Burrell Donkin
propappend is a convenience command that appends a given value to an existing
property
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I'm now trying from a clean repo / build, but it should be fixed.
works for me :-)
thanks
- robert
trunk doesn't compile for me ATM. my patch for the problem results in
test failures so i could probably do with someone who knows a little
more taking a look at it.
- robert
some properties consist of a comma separated list of values (for
example, 'org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories'). for these properties,
it would be useful to be able to append to the current value (for
example, ',http://example.org/repos/m2') without having to cut and
paste using proplist and propse
the servicemix maven features plugin looks like it might be really
useful for Karaf
1. is it possible to separate the servicemix specific functions?
2. are there any plans to move, fork or split the plugin into karaf?
- robert
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>
>> i'm willing to do most of the leg work but it's not going to fly
>> unless there are people with time and interest enough to review
>
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>
>> i'm willing to do most of the leg work but it's not going to fly
>> unless there are people with time and interest enough to review
>
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:32 PM, peter royal wrote:
>>> On May 17, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>>> this is a little bit of a crazy idea but if there eno
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:32 PM, peter royal wrote:
> On May 17, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>
>> this is a little bit of a crazy idea but if there enough interested
>> committers then maybe we could go over to excalibur and ask for karma
>> to rel
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>> none of the excalibur (ex-avalon) components are OSGi enabled. this
>> makes it a little tough to gradually migrate an avalon-based
>> application to OSGi. i've had a look aro
none of the excalibur (ex-avalon) components are OSGi enabled. this
makes it a little tough to gradually migrate an avalon-based
application to OSGi. i've had a look around and can't seem to find
suitable releases around.
this is a little bit of a crazy idea but if there enough interested
committe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated FELIX-1097:
-
Attachment: servicemix-to-karaf.diff
Patches NOTICE.txt, README.txt
raf
Reporter: Robert Burrell Donkin
Small documentation fixes related to transition from ServiceMix to Karaf
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> This is a formal vote to move ServiceMix Kernel codebase into Felix as
> Karaf subproject.
>
> [X ] +1 : move ServiceMix Kernel as Karaf subproject in Felix
> [ ] -1
(not binding)
i'm very keen to use karaf in james
- robert
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Right, I think Karaf need to address several issues before aiming to
> become a TLP.
> The first one is to build a more heterogeneous community (most of the
> committers come from the same company right now), the second is to
> align with Fe
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:23 PM, James Strachan
wrote:
> If the Felix folks are happy I see it as a win-win really. This could
> be a good way to help build the ServiceMix Kernel community - which is
> mostly to do with OSGi and little to do with ESBs and JBI and so forth
> - as well as building a
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Sorry, I think I misread your proposition. I thought it was referring
> to the "distribution" for an OSGi framework (such as ServiceMix
> Kernel).
> Given the size of the donation, the incubator could be a good target.
+1
- robert
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Marcel Offermans
wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2009, at 20:59 , Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> This project could also start as a subproject of felix and if there is
>> sufficient momentum around it, become a TLP later. I think it is an
>> easier process ...
+1
there's a lot
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Karl Pauls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 1 does suc
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Karl Pauls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> this seems a reasonably general requirement and i was wondering about a
>> general integration
>> testing micro library to test that a library was correctly enabled.
>>
>> 1 does such a library exist already?
>
> Not rea
over in JAMES, we'd like to OSGi enable our upcoming library releases
so that they can be used unforked in OSGi environments. the plan is to
use the maven plugin but we don't have a lot of OSGi experience. so
i'd like to add some integration tests to check that the libraries
function ok when used i
26 matches
Mail list logo
