I agree with the following very much!
That we use bndlib internally is a good (and the right) thing but it
is just that: an implementation detail.
Thanks
--Tang
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the heads up and thanks for your work you put into this. This is
really appreciated and
On 28 Feb 2013, at 07:43, Sahoo wrote:
Stuart,
I really appreciate all the effort you put in to make this plugin so great.
But, I am afraid, I can't support the renaming. It is going to frustrate
developers already frustrated with lack of good OSGi tools.
maven-bundle-plugin works great
On 28 Feb 2013, at 07:54, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the heads up and thanks for your work you put into this. This is
really appreciated and the also community wise the plugin is really a key in
the OSGi tooling.
Having said that I appreciate the desire to align with Maven
Hi folks,
Now that we've got a 2.x version of bndlib in Maven Central
(http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Cbiz.aQute%7Cbndlib%7C2.0.0.20130123-133441%7Cjar
- same level as shipped in bndtools 2) I'm looking to sort out a new release
of the maven-bundle-plugin, once I've gone through and
On 27/02/13 22:26, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Hi folks,
Now that we've got a 2.x version of bndlib in Maven Central
(http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Cbiz.aQute%7Cbndlib%7C2.0.0.20130123-133441%7Cjar
- same level as shipped in bndtools 2) I'm looking to sort out a new release
of the
Fine by me.
- richard
On 2/27/13 16:26, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Hi folks,
Now that we've got a 2.x version of bndlib in Maven Central
(http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Cbiz.aQute%7Cbndlib%7C2.0.0.20130123-133441%7Cjar
- same level as shipped in bndtools 2) I'm looking to sort out a
+1 (non binding)
looking forward to see the new plugin in action!!!
all the best!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com
+1 (non binding)
Tommaso
On 27/feb/2013, at 23:56, Simone Tripodi wrote:
+1 (non binding)
looking forward to see the new plugin in action!!!
all the best!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
Stuart,
I really appreciate all the effort you put in to make this plugin so
great. But, I am afraid, I can't support the renaming. It is going to
frustrate developers already frustrated with lack of good OSGi tools.
maven-bundle-plugin works great and we have many people used it now. The
Hi Stuart,
I am sorry that I select -1.
Fistly, updating into bndlib 2.x is greate, however, the reason of -1 is
that bndlib aims to OSGi bundle's development, and we can imagine that
maven-jar-plugin services for common jar and maven-bundle-plugin
services for osgi bundle, so I think that
Hi
Thanks for the heads up and thanks for your work you put into this. This is
really appreciated and the also community wise the plugin is really a key in
the OSGi tooling.
Having said that I appreciate the desire to align with Maven best practices but
I share the same concerns as Sahoo: The
11 matches
Mail list logo
