On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Marcel Offermans
wrote:
> Hey Karl,
>
> Thanks for your help on this!
>
> On Jan 31, 2009, at 13:09 , Karl Pauls wrote:
>
>> Seriously, nobody did say its easy to do releases - I agree with
>> richard that it is more of a pain then it should be. Contributions to
>>
Marcel Offermans wrote:
On Jan 31, 2009, at 13:09 , Karl Pauls wrote:
I think you already figured it out. You need to have a LICENSE and
NOTICE file in the root of your projects. Additionally, depending on
your set-up you might need an
META-INF/LICENSE=LICENSE,META-INF/NOTICE=NOTICE
instru
Hey Karl,
Thanks for your help on this!
On Jan 31, 2009, at 13:09 , Karl Pauls wrote:
Seriously, nobody did say its easy to do releases - I agree with
richard that it is more of a pain then it should be. Contributions to
make it easier by doing some maven magic or writing a check/built
script
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Marcel Offermans
wrote:
> Okay, let's see, I followed the release procedure on our site to the letter
> on this one, that does not mention anything about LICENSE or NOTICE files.
> Where should I copy them from (and why does maven not do that for you when
> prepar
Okay, let's see, I followed the release procedure on our site to the
letter on this one, that does not mention anything about LICENSE or
NOTICE files. Where should I copy them from (and why does maven not do
that for you when preparing a release)?
For the signing process, I also followed th
Yes, I +1 the -1...
I know the release process is a pain, but we need to re-do this one.
Luckily, the fixes are easy.
-> richard
Karl Pauls wrote:
-1
None of the artifacts (.jar, -project, -bin) contain any LICENSE nor
NOTICE files. Furthermore, as mentioned by Felix Meschberger at least
t
-1
None of the artifacts (.jar, -project, -bin) contain any LICENSE nor
NOTICE files. Furthermore, as mentioned by Felix Meschberger at least
two files have missing license headers (which I consider a blocker as
well).
regards,
Karl
p.s.: Additionally, I don't think the key that was used for si
+1 (non binding vote)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Pierre De Rop <
pierre.de_...@alcatel-lucent.fr> wrote:
> +1
>
> /pierre
>
>
> Marcel Offermans wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I'm opening a new vote for the first release candidate for the dependency
>> manager and its optional shell command
+1
/pierre
Marcel Offermans wrote:
Hello all,
I'm opening a new vote for the first release candidate for the
dependency manager and its optional shell command bundle. I've
compiled everything and put it up for testing and checking here:
http://people.apache.org/~marrs/dependencymanager-2.
Thanks for restarting the vote.
Here is my +1
Two files (SerialExecutor, State) of the dependencymanager bundle have
missing license headers, this should be fixed for future releases.
Regards
Felix
Marcel Offermans schrieb:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm opening a new vote for the first release candida
Hello all,
I'm opening a new vote for the first release candidate for the
dependency manager and its optional shell command bundle. I've
compiled everything and put it up for testing and checking here:
http://people.apache.org/~marrs/dependencymanager-2.0.0/
The KEYS file for verifying th
11 matches
Mail list logo