Can those annotations be moved to a gogo specific package ? Something like
org.apache.felix.gogo.annotation
I'd rather even have them in a separate module, but i think that would cause
problem because the coercion mechanism do actually use those.
I think those annotations are still experimental,
On 5/27/10 6:24 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Can those annotations be moved to a gogo specific package ? Something like
org.apache.felix.gogo.annotation
I'd rather even have them in a separate module, but i think that would cause
problem because the coercion mechanism do actually use those.
I
On 5/27/10 6:24 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Can those annotations be moved to a gogo specific package ? Something like
org.apache.felix.gogo.annotation
I'd rather even have them in a separate module, but i think that would cause
problem because the coercion mechanism do actually use those.
I
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 00:48, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 5/27/10 6:24 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Can those annotations be moved to a gogo specific package ? Something like
org.apache.felix.gogo.annotation
I'd rather even have them in a separate module, but i think that
On 5/27/10 7:25 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 00:48, Richard S. Hallhe...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 5/27/10 6:24 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Can those annotations be moved to a gogo specific package ? Something like
org.apache.felix.gogo.annotation
I'd rather
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 01:37, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 5/27/10 7:25 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 00:48, Richard S. Hallhe...@ungoverned.org
wrote:
On 5/27/10 6:24 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Can those annotations be moved to a gogo specific
A few things that would be missing imho to make that interesting:
* parameters annotation to mark parameters as optional or multi-valued
* flag and option could be merged (they are the same, maybe use an enum
value on the annotation to differentiate them and maybe have a smart default
value
On 5/4/10 2:33, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
A few things that would be missing imho to make that interesting:
* parameters annotation to mark parameters as optional or multi-valued
Currently, flags are always optional, whereas options are only optional
if a default value is specified. We
I'm interested to see how your experiment develops.
Meanwhile, an alternative approach to writing RFC-147 commands is presented
here:
https://www.osgi.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53
I'm happy to donate this 500-line Options class to Felix, if there is any
interest.
Derek
On 4 May 2010 14:07,
On 5/4/10 10:07, Derek Baum wrote:
I'm interested to see how your experiment develops.
Meanwhile, an alternative approach to writing RFC-147 commands is presented
here:
https://www.osgi.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53
I'm happy to donate this 500-line Options class to Felix, if there is any
I guess we should have tried this out in a sandbox but this experiment seems
rather harmless for existing users and potentially very powerful. And this
experiment is timely because I do have to update RFC 147. Will do different
next time :-)
On 4 mei 2010, at 08:33, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
A
What are those annotations suppose to actually provide ? It seems all they
can do is provide some basic help to the user, but does not really help the
user writing complex commands and dealing with complex arguments.
Have a look at an existing example:
On 5/3/10 14:51, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
What are those annotations suppose to actually provide ? It seems all they
can do is provide some basic help to the user, but does not really help the
user writing complex commands and dealing with complex arguments.
Have a look at an existing example:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 21:17, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 5/3/10 14:51, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
What are those annotations suppose to actually provide ? It seems all
they
can do is provide some basic help to the user, but does not really help
the
user writing complex
On 5/3/10 16:56, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 21:17, Richard S. Hallhe...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 5/3/10 14:51, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
What are those annotations suppose to actually provide ? It seems all
they
can do is provide some basic help to the user, but
15 matches
Mail list logo
