Karl Pauls wrote:
>> putting our releases up to the maven repository was a little bit work,
>> as I had to create the correct directory structure by hand and (more
>> important) had to extract the pom files for the various artifacts,
>> create md5s and sign them.
>
> On this subject, would you min
On 8/7/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 August 2007 05:12, Karl Pauls wrote:
> > On this subject, would you mind if I replace your signature with our
> > release key signature?
>
> The KEYS file will contain multiple keys over time, as release manager will
> both be var
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 05:12, Karl Pauls wrote:
> On this subject, would you mind if I replace your signature with our
> release key signature?
The KEYS file will contain multiple keys over time, as release manager will
both be varying over time and commonly over different parts of the project
> putting our releases up to the maven repository was a little bit work,
> as I had to create the correct directory structure by hand and (more
> important) had to extract the pom files for the various artifacts,
> create md5s and sign them.
On this subject, would you mind if I replace your signat
> The release plugin now supports a staging area. One can take a look at
> CXF for example (or maybe the naven site).
Interesting. I'll definitely have a look at that!
regards,
Karl
> On 7/21/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 21 July 2007 01:34, Carsten Ziegeler wrot
The release plugin now supports a staging area. One can take a look at
CXF for example (or maybe the naven site).
On 7/21/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 21 July 2007 01:34, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> We could also use the maven release plugin to do all the work for us.
On Saturday 21 July 2007 01:34, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> We could also use the maven release plugin to do all the work for us.
> Together with the gpg plugin it creates all necessary artifacts, signs
> them etc.
Yes, releasing large number of Maven artifacts without the help of the release
plug
I'd like to but i'o in holidays too. I may be able to help in a few weeks.
On 7/20/07, Marcel Offermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 20, 2007, at 19:34 , Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> We could also use the maven release plugin to do all the work for us.
I agree, automating the whole release p
On Jul 20, 2007, at 19:34 , Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We could also use the maven release plugin to do all the work for us.
I agree, automating the whole release process is something that
should be on our list for the next release. Karl has just gone on
holiday for a couple of weeks, but per
If the maven plugin works, i guess it should be used and the gpg
plugin should really be used with a staging repo in all cases to avoid
creating the checksum and signature files manually imho.
On 7/20/07, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
putting our releases up to the maven repos
10 matches
Mail list logo
