Re: Why DependencyManager rather than DS?

2013-10-16 Thread Marcel Offermans
Hello David, Sit down first, this is a long mail. :) On Oct 16, 2013, at 1:06 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: On Oct 15, 2013, at 1:33 PM, Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote: On Oct 15, 2013, at 19:51 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: DS still

Why DependencyManager rather than DS?

2013-10-15 Thread David Jencks
After seeing a lot of commit activity on DependencyManager I decided to try to understand what it's for, and after looking at the documentation I'm still not sure. It looks to me like the main feature is a fluent api that provides something like DS, although less declaratively, and then there

Re: Why DependencyManager rather than DS?

2013-10-15 Thread Richard S. Hall
On 10/15/13 13:51 , David Jencks wrote: After seeing a lot of commit activity on DependencyManager I decided to try to understand what it's for, and after looking at the documentation I'm still not sure. It looks to me like the main feature is a fluent api that provides something like DS,

Re: Why DependencyManager rather than DS?

2013-10-15 Thread Marcel Offermans
Hello David, On Oct 15, 2013, at 19:51 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: After seeing a lot of commit activity on DependencyManager I decided to try to understand what it's for, and after looking at the documentation I'm still not sure. It looks to me like the main feature is

Re: Why DependencyManager rather than DS?

2013-10-15 Thread David Jencks
Hi Marcel, thanks for the explanations…. more quibbling inline :-) On Oct 15, 2013, at 1:33 PM, Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote: Hello David, On Oct 15, 2013, at 19:51 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: After seeing a lot of commit activity on