Re: [External] Re: Unsubscription request

Rashul, Seetha, Jonathan and Fathima, you have to unsubscribe yourself from the mailing list (just like you subscribed to it yourself, hopefully). I've just documented how people can do this on http://fineract.apache.org/#contribute. Hope this helps. M. ___ Michael Vorburger

Re: Request for Unsubscription

On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 6:13 PM Rashul Chutani wrote: Please unsubscribe me from your mailing list. > Rahul, you have to unsubscribe yourself from the mailing list (just like you subscribed to it yourself, hopefully). I've just

Re: Re-opening Pull Request and Writing Test Cases for https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/527

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:28 AM RAHUL PAWAR wrote: > Hi Ed, > > Yes, the build is passing locally in machine. > That is very curious, I don't see how that's possible; you should see the same failures that Travis CI reports... ...do make sure that you rebase to the latest master, and run a full

Re: [Mifos-developer] Setup dev environment for Intellij

+Dev @fineract.apache.org mailing list, which is a better mailing list for things related to https://github.com/apache/fineract/ : You should be able to code on the regular Java without worrying about the OpenJPA enhancement... you don't need that while you code, as you cannot really "run Fineract

Re: Interested in GSOC 2020

BTW the "classical" (non-CN) Fineract could use work re. Swagger/OpenAPI as well, see https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-733 for pending work... On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:25 AM Sourabh Sharma < sharmasourabh121...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:50 PM Giorgio

Request for Unsubscription

Please unsubscribe me from your mailing list. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 03/22/20, 10

Re: Fineract-CN - ActiveMQ vs Kafka

Hello Gents, following this statement Cassandra is primarily used for logging commands ( see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/CQRS+in+Fineract+CN ) and journal entries. We don't need Cassandra y neither a document/column db. Just Redis (with Streams) is enough. BR, Giorgio

Re: Fineract-CN - ActiveMQ vs Kafka

Thanks Juhan, i try your branch and keep going on that. Best Regards, Giorgio

Re: Fineract-CN - ActiveMQ vs Kafka

We don't have to be backwards compatible with upgrade to Spring Boot 2 and Java 11. We can just do the upgrade. However we need to keep the system functional and for this we need to keep our builds (travis-ci) passing. For this we need to start with upgrading the micro service which doesn't depend

Re: Fineract-CN - ActiveMQ vs Kafka

Ok, the discussion is going to be interesting now: 1. We need a broker mechanism that will scale for and reduce the latency. We could support both just using a config parameter and let the user decide. 2. +1 DynamoDB . Thanks for the info: Different members of the community have upgraded but nobod

Re: Fineract-CN - ActiveMQ vs Kafka

1. The ideal solution would separate implementation from rest of the code so different organizations could use different technologies. I don't see much value in replacing ActiveMQ (as it work out of the box and requires little maintenance). I see a huge win if it would be possible to use other alte

GSOC 2020

Hey ! I am Avi currently studying in 3rd year computer engineering in PDPU, India. I have been coding for more than 5 years. I am great at Python, C++, Android, Linux and Tensorflow. I have knowledge of java, Web Dev (HTML, CSS, JS, Node.js etc) , C# etc. I want to apply in gsoc for Mifos for the p