Re: CI based on GitHub Actions

2021-11-04 Thread Nasser Kaze
+1 On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 01:41 VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ < victor.rom...@fintecheando.mx> wrote: > +1 > > El jue, 4 nov 2021 a las 17:17, Nazeer Hussain Shaik (< > nazeerhussain.sh...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >> +1 >> >> Thanks, >> Nazeer >> >> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:42 AM Bharath Gowda w

Re: CI based on GitHub Actions

2021-11-04 Thread VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ
+1 El jue, 4 nov 2021 a las 17:17, Nazeer Hussain Shaik (< nazeerhussain.sh...@gmail.com>) escribió: > +1 > > Thanks, > Nazeer > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:42 AM Bharath Gowda wrote: > >> +1 :) >> >> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021, 2:07 AM Awasum Yannick wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 5:3

Re: CI based on GitHub Actions

2021-11-04 Thread Nazeer Hussain Shaik
+1 Thanks, Nazeer On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:42 AM Bharath Gowda wrote: > +1 :) > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2021, 2:07 AM Awasum Yannick wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 5:36 PM Ed Cable wrote: >> >>> +1 from my side and I think @Michael Vorburger has >>> been a fan as well as we've implemen

Re: CI based on GitHub Actions

2021-11-04 Thread Bharath Gowda
+1 :) On Fri, Nov 5, 2021, 2:07 AM Awasum Yannick wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 5:36 PM Ed Cable wrote: > >> +1 from my side and I think @Michael Vorburger has >> been a fan as well as we've implemented it as CI for Mifos/OpenMF repos. >> >> Ed >> >> On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 9:08 AM Ale

Re: CI based on GitHub Actions

2021-11-04 Thread Awasum Yannick
+1 On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 5:36 PM Ed Cable wrote: > +1 from my side and I think @Michael Vorburger has > been a fan as well as we've implemented it as CI for Mifos/OpenMF repos. > > Ed > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 9:08 AM Aleksandar Vidakovic < > chee...@monkeysintown.com> wrote: > >> +1 for Gith

Re: CI based on GitHub Actions

2021-11-04 Thread Ed Cable
+1 from my side and I think @Michael Vorburger has been a fan as well as we've implemented it as CI for Mifos/OpenMF repos. Ed On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 9:08 AM Aleksandar Vidakovic < chee...@monkeysintown.com> wrote: > +1 for Github Actions... use it for quite a while and it's really reliable. >

Re: CI based on GitHub Actions

2021-11-04 Thread Aleksandar Vidakovic
+1 for Github Actions... use it for quite a while and it's really reliable. On Thu, 4 Nov 2021, 16:20 Benura Abeywardena, wrote: > Hi Petri, > > Good idea ! > > Thanks & Regards, > Benura > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 8:25 PM Petri Tuomola > wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> As I’m sure you’ve noticed, Tra

Re: CI based on GitHub Actions

2021-11-04 Thread Benura Abeywardena
Hi Petri, Good idea ! Thanks & Regards, Benura On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 8:25 PM Petri Tuomola wrote: > Hi all > > As I’m sure you’ve noticed, Travis builds have recently been getting more > and more unreliable: either there is a queue of several hours before the > build is executed, or in many c

CI based on GitHub Actions

2021-11-04 Thread Petri Tuomola
Hi all As I’m sure you’ve noticed, Travis builds have recently been getting more and more unreliable: either there is a queue of several hours before the build is executed, or in many cases no build is triggered at all. This seems to be due to the limits on Apache’s Travis account. I asked abou