RE: Validation error

API data validation is done individually for each different API end point, but they all invariably throw PlatformApiDataValidationException. Message shown on community-app is based on the translations available in locale-XX.json files in community-app/app/global-translations Regards, Adi Raju

RE: [Mifos-developer] Can't create new loan

There was a bug with high interest loans submitted with disbursement date of 29 or 30 or 31. I have fixed and sent PR for the same. Fix will be part of next release. Regards, Adi Raju Principal Architect, <http://www.confluxtechnologies.com/> Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd A

RE: Configuring Penalty Charge depending on loan's interest rate

I think your steps are right. Let us know if you get into any problems. Since this is very specific requirement, I think it is better to take community's input before we push the code changes to common repo. May be a vote on u...@fineract.incubator.apache.org. Regards, Adi Raju Principal

[jira] [Updated] (FINERACT-361) Getting error.msg.loanschedule.emi.amount.must.be.greter.than.interest on loan submit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adi Raju updated FINERACT-361: -- Description: Submittal of loan application throws

[jira] [Updated] (FINERACT-361) Getting error.msg.loanschedule.emi.amount.must.be.greter.than.interest on loan submit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adi Raju updated FINERACT-361: -- Description: Submittal of loan application throws

[jira] [Created] (FINERACT-361) Getting error.msg.loanschedule.emi.amount.must.be.greter.than.interest on loan submit

Adi Raju created FINERACT-361: - Summary: Getting error.msg.loanschedule.emi.amount.must.be.greter.than.interest on loan submit Key: FINERACT-361 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-361

RE: [Mifos-developer] How is 'Link Savings' spinner inflated in Group Loan Application?

'accountLinkingOptions' is populated with list of active savings accounts and it is currently done only for individual clients. Code can be found at LoansApiResource class template method. Regards, Adi Raju Principal Architect, <http://www.confluxtechnologies.com/> C

RE: Configuring Penalty Charge depending on loan's interest rate

Hi Lionel, New enhancement with new calculation type would be required to address your requirement. Regards, Adi Raju Principal Architect, <http://www.confluxtechnologies.com/> Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd Address: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layout 1st Block, Ben

[Design] Slab Based Charges

Hi All, Design and development approach for Slab Based Charges is documented https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Slab+Based+Charges Please provide your inputs. Regards, Adi Raju Principal Architect, <http://www.confluxtechnologies.com/> Conflux Technologies P

[Design] Recurring Journal Entries

Hi All, Development approach/notes for recurring journal entries are documented at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Recurring+Journal+Entri es Please provide your inputs. Regards, Adi Raju Principal Architect, <http://www.confluxtechnologies.com/> C

RE: Issues in interest recalculation

job runs every day, interest will be revised to include calculations as of that day. Regards, Adi Raju Principal Architect, Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd Address: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layout 1st Block, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560043 INDIA Disclaimer: The information contained

RE: Business Event Processor

o find consensus on Data Driven Authorization > within the community, given the configuration is usually very complex > and the real benefit is questionable. > > Cheers > > Markus > > -Original Message- > From: Adi Raju [mailto:adi.r...@conflux

RE: [VOTE] [APACHE FINERACT] 0.5.0-incubating for release

+1 Verified signatures and checksum Build is fine Integration tests are passing Regards, Adi Raju Principal Architect, Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd Address: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layout 1st Block, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560043 INDIA Disclaimer: The information contained

RE: Issues in interest recalculation

Hi Sander PSB Regards, Adi Raju Principal Architect, Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd Address: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layout 1st Block, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560043 INDIA Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail message and any files/attachment transmitted

RE: Issues in interest recalculation

Looks like they are linked to some other factors as well. If you can reproduce them on demo.openmf.org and provide with loan ids or relevant details, we can get back with clarifications or verify if it is really a bug. Regards, Adi Raju Principal Architect, Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd Address: #304, 2nd

RE: Business Event Processor

visibility even in the read APIs based on different business rules. In the example provided, "Data Driven Authorisation" was a simple validation feature request, which requires allowing an API based on role and not just permission assigned to the App User. Regards, Adi Raju Principal

RE: Doubt on Center Savings Account

savings account creation. groupId mentioned in the parameter will carry the centerId(virtually it is again a unique groupId) Regards, Adi Raju Principal Architect, <http://www.confluxtechnologies.com/> Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd Address: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layo

Business Event Processor

. Regards, Adi Raju Principal Architect, <http://www.confluxtechnologies.com/> Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd Address: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layout 1st Block, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560043 INDIA Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail message and any

RE: Workflow using Datatable Verification

so Adi can analyze. > > Based on that analysis along with the proposed design from Adi, I > would like to set up a call with Adi, Sander, and anyone else along > with Markus to give his blessing to the approach we should take. > > Markus is in Indonesia all this week so let's targe

RE: Notification Module Review

Hi Adhyan, We are currently focussing on a release to be made this week. We will take up your review immediately after that. Regards, Adi From: Adhyan Srivastava [mailto:adhyan2...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 November 2016 02:10 To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org Cc: Ed Cable; Adi Raju

RE: Workflow using Datatable Verification

On 28 October 2016 at 11:11, Adi Raju <adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > > > I have put down requirements, user story breakdown and > Design/Implementation approach for the 'Workflow using Datatable > Verification' feature planned in

Workflow using Datatable Verification

Hi All, I have put down requirements, user story breakdown and Design/Implementation approach for the 'Workflow using Datatable Verification' feature planned in the near future. Please find the documentation at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Workflow+using+Datatabl

Re: Fineract Board Report for November

+1 On 27-Oct-2016 11:59 PM, "Jim Jagielski" wrote: > It's not only the release but also the general way in which things > are progressing... > > > On Oct 27, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > > > > I think that would be great! This is my +1. > > > >

RE: Self-Service APIs to Change Password?

Self Service API that can be used to update password on their own is delivered and part of fineract/develop branch. Regards, Adi From: Adi Raju [mailto:adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com] Sent: 21 October 2016 20:36 To: dev Cc: Stebbins Stebbins; Denila Philip Subject: Re: Self-Service

RE: Questions regarding Log in via Self-Service APIs

PSB From: Ed Cable [mailto:edca...@mifos.org] Sent: 19 October 2016 07:18 To: dev (dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org) Cc: Adi Raju; Denila Philip Subject: Questions regarding Log in via Self-Service APIs Hi Adi, I will let the devs and PM working on the community Android self-service

RE: Pentaho Report in Mifos

of user directory(root) Is it possible for the server to fail to read only the report i created and able to read all other report while they are all listed in /.mifosx/pentahoReports? what could be the cause? Mexina On 09/28/2016 07:23 AM, Adi Raju wrote: > This error comes when report fi

RE: Using Self-Service APIs to return accounts of only one client

Self Service APIs were created not only with end customer in mind. These APIs are created to support agent banking, field staff and other scenarios as well. Basic idea is that the data and operations are restricted as compared to a bank staff. Design decisions and the approach is documented

RE: [Mifos-developer] password reset with self service API

Self service user is just a special type of application user with restricted access. So existing app user apis are used for any user CRUD operations, https://demo.openmf.org/api-docs/apiLive.htm#users_create isSelfServiceUser and clients are the additional params differentiating a normal user

RE: [Mifos-developer] how to deploy Fineract with http behind reverse proxy handling https?

+dev@fineract Hi, fineract-provider\src\main\resources\META-INF\spring\securityContext.xml can be modified to allow http. Regards, Adi From: Yalu [mailto:y...@vajrainteractive.com] Sent: 23 September 2016 15:00 To: Mifos software development Subject: [Mifos-developer] how to

Re: totalFilteredRecords returning incorrect value

What is the API? And the request params? On 24-Sep-2016 4:39 AM, "Arvind Sujeeth" wrote: > Hi all, > > I've observed another strange (and seemingly incorrect behavior). I > launched a very simple query (lookup client) 1000 times, and 14 of those > times (i.e.

RE: [Mifos-developer] Transactions executed multiple times

Arvind, The error is self explanatory. Your script is violating 'account_no_UNIQUE' unique constraint on the m_client table. Please identify if your script itself is inserting duplicate account no. Alternatively, it is possible that you have configured "Account Number Preferences" which is

RE: Internal Server Error - Loan Booking

Zayyad, It is difficult to figure out a scenario on why a db record might be locked perpetually. I think your immediate step should be to have your DBA to get the records unlocked. If you are able to figure out the scenario thru which such error happens, that would be great. Regards,

RE: Start work on FINERACT-209

Lionel 2016-09-14 6:26 GMT-03:00 Adi Raju <adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com>: > Lionel, > > > > As part of MakerChecker query response, along with Entity Name, > Action, even url is sent. Could we possibly use that to show the link > to the document? > > > >

RE: Start work on FINERACT-209

approval. Any ideas about how to improve this? Thanks again Lionel 2016-09-02 10:38 GMT-03:00 Adi Raju <adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com <mailto:adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com> >: You can go ahead with the changes and send in the PR. This is the right mailing lists f

RE: Query profiling

Hi Immanuel, Across MifosX, a user’s data visibility is restricted to the office that they belong to or the sub-offices below hierarchy. In the reports, ‘m_office o join m_office ounder’ is generally used to show the results for the selected office and restrict the data returned based on

RE: Standing Instruction Bug

Hi Zayyad, I do not see your observations as a bugs, but as requirements for enhancement/improvement. I would suggest this be discussed in user community group and derive the variations/requirements that will have to be added to the product. Regards, Adi From: Zayyad A. Said

[jira] [Assigned] (FINERACT-209) Maker-Checker principle for Document management

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adi Raju reassigned FINERACT-209: - Assignee: Adi Raju (was: Markus Geiss) > Maker-Checker principle for Document managem

[jira] [Updated] (FINERACT-209) Maker-Checker principle for Document management

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adi Raju updated FINERACT-209: -- Assignee: Markus Geiss (was: Adi Raju) > Maker-Checker principle for Document managem

RE: Start work on FINERACT-209

You can go ahead with the changes and send in the PR. This is the right mailing lists for any development or contribution related questions. Regards, Adi -Original Message- From: Lionel Raymundi - Poincenot [mailto:lio...@poincenot.com] Sent: 02 September 2016 18:55 To:

RE: Upcoming Apache Board Report

All, Apologies, I have requested for help with GRUNT, but what we really need is help with GRADLE. Regards, Adi -Original Message- From: Adi Raju [mailto:adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com] Sent: 01 September 2016 09:08 To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Upcoming Apache

RE: Upcoming Apache Board Report

Hi Myrle/Community, Sorry for the delayed response, mail was lost in the follow up list due to other priorities. In our last attempt we have been successful in getting the code cleaned up to remove hibernate dependency. Creation of war file while using build/war/dist did not include the

RE: Maker-Checker principle and Document management

in jira to comment on this matter? Thanks again Lionel 2016-08-03 2:33 GMT-03:00 Adi Raju <adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com>: > Hi Lionel, > > Maker-checker enabled API workflow is like this: > 1. Maker invokes an API > 2. System does all the validation, reverses the t

RE: Maker-Checker principle and Document management

Hi Lionel, Maker-checker enabled API workflow is like this: 1. Maker invokes an API 2. System does all the validation, reverses the transaction and stores the complete API as part of audit table (No DB changes) 3. Checker reviews the API request and approves 4. The API is invoked again and the

RE: Getting a problem in creating a client

niel [mailto:mex...@singo.co.tz] Sent: 14 July 2016 17:03 To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Getting a problem in creating a client Dear Adi I have understood you. Thank you for the explanation. Regards Mexina. On 07/14/2016 03:52 PM, Adi Raju wrote: > Max length for account n

RE: Getting a problem in creating a client

now. I don't know the reason but thank you for the help. Regards Mexina. On 07/14/2016 01:06 PM, Adi Raju wrote: > You might be giving duplicate value for external_id or mobile no. > Alternatively, Have you configured any "Account Number Preferences" rules in > Admin > Syste

RE: Getting a problem in creating a client

You might be giving duplicate value for external_id or mobile no. Alternatively, Have you configured any "Account Number Preferences" rules in Admin > System menu? Regards, Adi -Original Message- From: MexinaM Daniel [mailto:mex...@singo.co.tz] Sent: 14 July 2016 15:12 To:

RE: Clarification on Validator Classes for Multiple Rescheduling of a Loan

half of Aug (tested formal). Regards, Adi From: Andris Kaneps [mailto:akan...@mtgcapital.ch] Sent: 14 July 2016 11:49 To: Adi Raju <adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com> Cc: Ed Cable <edca...@mifos.org>; Agris Varpins <agris.varp...@mtgcapital.ch>; Sander van der Heyde

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.3.1 (incubating)

Hi John, The code doesn't have any hibernate dependency. But as part of dev environment, to execute integration tests, we are using hibernate. AFAIK LGPL is allowed for dev environment. >From deployment perspective, we would expect the user of this project to make >a choice of JPA vendor and

RE: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.3.1-incubating for release

+1 -Original Message- From: Myrle Krantz [mailto:mkra...@mifos.org] Sent: 07 July 2016 15:00 To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.3.1-incubating for release Hi all, Nazeer has addressed my concerns (on his holiday -- that's dedication). I'm changing

RE: Configuring template to pull Guarantor Data

llegomstraat 12-14, office 0.09, 1058 LS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Adi Raju <adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > > > I have created a sample template by name “Sample Guarantors Template” > on https://demo.openmf.org,

RE: Your Mifos Experience

Hi Amit, As mentioned on another thread, templates use mustache library to format the documents. I have provided sample of how to iterate on guarantors. To use any data, you will have to use the mappers and associate any available API. Credit scoring is not available in mifos. You will have to

RE: Configuring template to pull Guarantor Data

working. I am not even a successful user of this input box, so regular users should be able to figure out proper way to add the template structure. Regards, Adi From: Ashok [mailto:as...@confluxtechnologies.com] Sent: 07 July 2016 10:28 To: Adi Raju <adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com>;

RE: Microservices release question

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Adi Raju <adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com> wrote: > I would expect there would be X number of microservices which are > core/heart of the application which no deployment can do away with. I > would suggest these to be released as a single pac

RE: Microservices release question

I would expect there would be X number of microservices which are core/heart of the application which no deployment can do away with. I would suggest these to be released as a single package/release. All other microservices should be optional based on the deployment/end user requirements. They

RE: HEADS UP: JIRA email patterns are changing over the weekend

Is this enabled already? I am getting mailer daemon failure notice for email id issues-subscr...@fineract.incubator.apache.org. Regards, Adi -Original Message- From: Myrle Krantz [mailto:mkra...@mifos.org] Sent: 23 May 2016 20:15 To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: HEADS

RE: Possible bug: not able to add charges to newly created saving account after account activation

We see that the issue is happening when Account number prefix setting is used, and this bug is prevalent from Apr 7, 2015. Fix will be applied to fineract develop by EOD today and same will be part of next release. Regards, Adi -Original Message- From: Nayan Ambali

RE: Review of Pull Request from James Rowe

:jrowe...@gmail.com] Sent: 12 May 2016 22:42 To: Adi Raju <adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com> Cc: Ed Cable <edca...@mifos.org>; dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org; Austin H <aus...@haedrian.io>; Nathan McClellan <nat...@mentorsinternational.org> Subject: Re: Review of Pull Request

RE: Review of Pull Request from James Rowe

@fineract.incubator.apache.org; Adi Raju <adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com> Cc: James Rowe <jrowe...@gmail.com>; Austin H <aus...@haedrian.io>; Nathan McClellan <nat...@mentorsinternational.org> Subject: Review of Pull Request from James Rowe Hi Fineract devs, I wanted to make sure y

[jira] [Closed] (FINERACT-32) Dormant Savings Accounts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adi Raju closed FINERACT-32. Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Adi Raju (was: Markus Geiss) Closed after verification by QA > Dorm

RE: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.1.2-incubating for release

+1 -Original Message- From: Nazeer Shaik [mailto:nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com] Sent: 09 May 2016 17:46 To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.1.2-incubating for release Hi Myrle, Thank you for reviewing this release and please find my comments

[jira] [Closed] (FINERACT-108) Disbursement charge applied to tranche loan is not getting displayed in repayment schedule after submission of loan application, approval and disbursement of the loan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adi Raju closed FINERACT-108. - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Adi Raju (was: Markus Geiss) Closed after verification by QA

[jira] [Closed] (FINERACT-152) Should not allowed to add date field for the "Savings no activity fee" if the fee/penalty is added after submitting the savings application.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adi Raju closed FINERACT-152. - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Adi Raju (was: Markus Geiss) Closed after verification by QA

[jira] [Closed] (FINERACT-153) Should not allowed to pay "Savings no activity charge" if the savings account is in active state

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adi Raju closed FINERACT-153. - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Adi Raju (was: Markus Geiss) Closed after verification by QA

RE: About FINERACT-11 | Certain loans crash entire server

Hi Nelson, As per the comments on MIFOSX-2409 which is linked to FINERACT-11, the issue is resolved. The comment says: "We migrated to Conflux servers and they got it sorted out. I think the issue was that our products were set to 2 decimals, but some Fees we computed had more decimals." Is

[jira] [Commented] (FINERACT-154) If "Post Interest For Savings" and "Update Savings Dormant Accounts" scheduler jobs are executed together then post interest scheduler job fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15277815#comment-15277815 ] Adi Raju commented on FINERACT-154: --- In automated scheduler scenario this use case would be addressed

RE: FW: About FINERACT-11 | Certain loans crash entire server

As I understand from QA, this issue is not present on the latest version of fineract/openmf releases. Nelson, please provide the version details of your deployment. Regards, Adi -Original Message- From: Nayan Ambali [mailto:nayan.amb...@gmail.com] Sent: 10 May 2016 12:35 To:

Re: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.1.1-incubating for release

We are bumping the version because there is some change in the source to fix one of the gradle task. Regards, Adi On 09-May-2016 9:16 am, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: > One question: are you bumping the version # to 0.1.2-incubating just > because of that? > > It is fine to

RE: Loan Fees Bug

Hi Zayyad, Usability Part: How the payment amount is adjusted towards installment components(principal/interest/fee/penalties) are decided by the Repayment strategy chosen while defining the loan product. Currently we have 7 different strategies which specify how paid amount should be

RE: Clarification on Validator Classes for Multiple Rescheduling of a Loan

Hi Ed, Subramanya will be working on this task tomorrow. Regards, Adi From: Ed Cable [mailto:edca...@mifos.org] Sent: 18 April 2016 21:49 To: Andris Kaneps <akan...@mtgcapital.ch> Cc: Agris Varpins <agris.varp...@mtgcapital.ch>; Adi Raju <adi.r...@confluxtechnologi

RE: [VOTE] [FINERACT] 0.1.0.incubating for release

Hi Justin, Thanks for the feedback. Licensing is quite confusing and your inputs are appreciated. Since we are intending to make source only release and not include any jar or compiled binaries. Does this qualify only as dependency? In such case, we wouldn't have anything other than apache text

RE: Clarification on Validator Classes for Multiple Rescheduling of a Loan

[mailto:agris.varp...@mtgcapital.ch] Sent: 12 April 2016 13:38 To: Adi Raju <adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com> Cc: Sander van der Heyden <sandervanderhey...@musoni.eu>; Ed Cable <edca...@mifos.org>; dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org; robert wizglobal <rob...@wizglobal.co.k

RE: [jira] [Updated] (FINERACT-135) Performance improvement using EHCache or any other cache managers

As the loan portfolio size increases, performance of most of loan transaction APIs is seen to be slow, more specifically collection sheet and repayments. In any loan related transaction, Loan entity object is created. Initial observation is that creation of this Loan object is resulting in around

RE: SELF SERVICE USER

Self service user can only read their own information. Self service user creating clients doesn't make any sense. User creation and associating clients with user is in the hands of admins. See https://mifosforge.jira.com/wiki/display/MIFOSX/Customer+Self+Service for clarity. Regards, Adi

[jira] [Resolved] (FINERACT-64) If the charge created as Disbursement fee and Tranche loan with 2 tranche is disbursed, then charge is getting applied for the 2nd tranche also in trasactions page

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adi Raju resolved FINERACT-64. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: subramanyasn (was: Markus Geiss) > If the charge crea

[jira] [Commented] (FINERACT-39) Simple Interest Calculation for Savings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-39?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15168496#comment-15168496 ] Adi Raju commented on FINERACT-39: -- [~dh...@mifos.org] In the current implementation, while creating

RE: [DISCUSS] Git procedure and branching model

Need some more clarity. If we use CTR, how do we control the release timelines. I mean, if we get a commit at the last minute or commits with partial fix/regressions, wouldn't this create issues with release timeline? Am I right to assume, release RTC process starts X days before planned release