"Second star to the right, and straight on till morning."
I think we're good to go. Thanks everyone for their patience and hard work!
EdB
On Thursday, August 1, 2013, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/31/13 6:27 PM, "Justin Mclean" >
> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >>> Is there any advance on that?
> >> N
On 7/31/13 6:27 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>>> Is there any advance on that?
>> Not sure what you mean. But it is all checked into the release and
>>develop branches.
>
>I mean are there any other issues that anyone thinks to be addressed
>before I make RC4?
I'm all set.
Thanks,
-Alex
Hi,
>> Is there any advance on that?
> Not sure what you mean. But it is all checked into the release and develop
> branches.
I mean are there any other issues that anyone thinks to be addressed before I
make RC4?
Thanks,
Justin
I think it looks great. Will be nice to have this and the sdk released :)
-Mark
Fixed in develop branch. I dont think this warrants a new RC, though.
>
> Thanks for taking time to test and vote!
>
> Regards,
> Om
>
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Mark Kessler
wrote:
> +1
>
> OS: Win7 64bit
> Air client: 3.8
> Flex SDK: 4.10 (FP 11.8)
>
> built source (from given link)
> Installed binaries (from given link)
> Setup flex with Air 3.8 and FP 11.8
>
>
>
> One minor graphical thing. when building the source, th
On 7/31/13 4:34 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> I would like the release to contain the IList revert, the resource
>>modules
>> fix, and the ProductInfo change to "Apache Flex".
>Is there any advance on that?
Not sure what you mean. But it is all checked into the release and
develop branc
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/31/13 4:09 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >As far as I can see there's still outstanding issues with Flash Builder
> >(and it's unlikely 4.6 can be fixed) so do we release the voted on RC3 or
> >not? This has now been held
Hi,
> I would like the release to contain the IList revert, the resource modules
> fix, and the ProductInfo change to "Apache Flex".
Is there any advance on that?
> The version can remain at 4.10.0.
Even though this will mean that "New Project" in both Flash builder 4.6 and
4.7 are broken? At s
+1
OS: Win7 64bit
Air client: 3.8
Flex SDK: 4.10 (FP 11.8)
built source (from given link)
Installed binaries (from given link)
Setup flex with Air 3.8 and FP 11.8
One minor graphical thing. when building the source, there is a word wrap
issue on the starting header with the asterisk borders.
On 7/31/13 4:09 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>As far as I can see there's still outstanding issues with Flash Builder
>(and it's unlikely 4.6 can be fixed) so do we release the voted on RC3 or
>not? This has now been held up for a week.
I would like the release to contain the IList revert,
Hi,
As far as I can see there's still outstanding issues with Flash Builder (and
it's unlikely 4.6 can be fixed) so do we release the voted on RC3 or not? This
has now been held up for a week.
If we are making a new release here still some work to be done, eg do we change
the version form 4.10
Om,
No blog post. A google plus user posted that tid bit on the Apache Flex
Community page (
https://plus.google.com/104408486838026884935/posts/17vGFEevkZM). I don't
know of any side affects yet, as i haven't moved off of Flex 4.6 yet. But
when i do (planning for this next dev cycle to move to
As time marches on, this method of "fixing" DV will become more and more
broken. FP version changes and SDK changes will not be realized and will
cause issues -- from crashes to bad code. I've already run across some
major issues trying to use the new DataGrid with the hacked DV setup...
The tim
On 7/31/13 9:55 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
wrote:
>Hi Guys :-)
>
>Today I think I reached an important milestone with my
>generator-maven-plugin. This will definitely need some fine-tuning, but I
>think I'll do that on the way. At least now I can generate any form of
>code from any sort of
+1 (binding)
Tested installer on Windows 8, just had to run as admin.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On my Mac:
> - source builds
> - binary installs
> - binary and source MD5 + GPG check out
> - language selection box thingy fixed
> - SDK (nightly) in
>
> Think I will be needing quite some input from anyone on the Falcon
> Compiler team. Is there any sort of documentation for using and configuring
> the compiler programmatically (not using the intermediate commandline)?
>
>
flex-falcon\compiler\src\org\apache\flex\compiler\clients.MXMLC.java mig
On 7/31/2013 11:59 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Chris Martin wrote:
Thanks for the note! I learnt that nugget in this thread. Is this
document somewhere on a blog post, etc.? If not I will add a note about
this on our wiki. Any known side effects of doing t
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Chris Martin wrote:
> > It is really up to Adobe to figure out if they want to honor their
> > user base's desire to continue using FB 4.6. DV does not work with
> Apache
> > Flex in any case.
>
> Om,
>
> Just a heads up, Design View does work with Apache Fle
Hi Guys :-)
Today I think I reached an important milestone with my generator-maven-plugin.
This will definitely need some fine-tuning, but I think I'll do that on the
way. At least now I can generate any form of code from any sort of Java Class
File or Source File. That was the big step I neede
+1 (binding)
asc sigs verify for zip and tar.gz
Tar.gz built and installed a working SDK from RC3 on Mac OSX 10.6.8 with
AIR 3.4.
Rat-check passed
README and RELEASE_NOTES look fine
The installer still chooses en_US as the default even though my system
preferences has pt as the first one in th
> It is really up to Adobe to figure out if they want to honor their
> user base's desire to continue using FB 4.6. DV does not work with
Apache
> Flex in any case.
Om,
Just a heads up, Design View does work with Apache Flex 4.9.1. But you
have to modify the sdk's flex-sdk-description.xml f
When you run that, it checks against keys stored somewhere. I think
locally. I would think you imported some keys at some point in the past,
no? If you import our most recent KEYS file it should show Justin with a
stronger key. Or import from a keys server.
On 7/31/13 8:44 AM, "Erik de Bruin"
Ah, I see, that first list is done by the committers themselves, with
SVN and a 'foaf' file... LOL. I'll just stick to the list that is
generated from the Apache LDAP ;-)
EdB
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Also, I don't see Alex nor Om on that list. What did we do wron
Also, I don't see Alex nor Om on that list. What did we do wrong?
EdB
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>> It's not a big deal, as only committers can make releases and it's fairly
>> easy to verify who is a committer and their key.
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/list_M.ht
> It's not a big deal, as only committers can make releases and it's fairly
> easy to verify who is a committer and their key.
>
> http://people.apache.org/list_M.html#jmclean
>
> Although I don't see you on that list you're on this one:
> http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#erikdebruin
I didn't import anything... I just ran 'gpg --verify xxx.asc xxx'
against the RC files.
EdB
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> The key system still requires that the keys you verify against are
> updated. That's the kink you ran into. You probably imported Justin's
> key be
The key system still requires that the keys you verify against are
updated. That's the kink you ran into. You probably imported Justin's
key before he strengthened by attending key-signing parties. If you
re-import his key and then verify against it, it should show that more
people have signed i
Hi,
> I still don't get it, but if it's good enough for Apache, it better be
> good enough for me, right?
Well if you look up your key it tell me who you are are but there's no one who
backs up that claim.
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x00397EFE935E15AF
If you look up me
I didn't memorise all of it, but yeah, when I created my key I did
peruse that document.
I still don't get it, but if it's good enough for Apache, it better be
good enough for me, right?
EdB
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Don't get me wrong, I'm not attacking
Hi,
> Don't get me wrong, I'm not attacking you or your key or anything,
> just trying to understand the system and the reasoning behind it!
I'm assume you read this?
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html
Justin
Hi,
> Yeah, I know about that... You did, apparently, but I still got the
> WARNING that I can't trust your key.
Because you don't trust me or anyone who has signed my key.
Justin
Don't get me wrong, I'm not attacking you or your key or anything,
just trying to understand the system and the reasoning behind it!
EdB
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Yeah, I know about that... You did, apparently, but I still got the
> WARNING that I can't trust your
Yeah, I know about that... You did, apparently, but I still got the
WARNING that I can't trust your key.
EdB
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> What does it take to get a key certified with a trusted signature?
> Meet people face to face, prove who you are, and ge
Hi,
> What does it take to get a key certified with a trusted signature?
Meet people face to face, prove who you are, and get them to sign your key (and
vice versa).
http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/PgpKeySigning
Justin
What does it take to get a key certified with a trusted signature? In
other words, how do we get rid of that warning on our release files?
I'm a noob at this signing stuff, but it freaked me out that after
jumping through all the hoops to get a key and put it in all the
required places etc etc. -
+1 (binding)
On my Mac:
- source builds
- binary installs
- binary and source MD5 + GPG check out
- language selection box thingy fixed
- SDK (nightly) installs fine
EdB
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:22 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 2.6
Hi,
> Just something to think about: when I last offered to build the
> Installer RCs, Justin told me he'd do it because his key is 'better'
> than mine.
And "better" in only people outside the project can look it up - we know who
you are and trust you :-)
Justin
Hi,
> gpg: Signature made Tue Jul 30 09:26:36 2013 CEST using RSA key ID AEEAD151
> gpg: Good signature from "Justin Mclean "
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
> Primary key fingerprin
Om, Justin,
Just something to think about: when I last offered to build the
Installer RCs, Justin told me he'd do it because his key is 'better'
than mine. I agreed because you can never be careful enough. However,
when I do a verify on the latest build, I get:
gpg: Signature made Tue Jul 30 09:2
Hi Chris,
yeah! Thanks to the big effort you and Jose made combined with latest
IntelliJ IDEA 13 EAP bug fixes, I think we finaly has a dream enviroment to
develop with. There's space to improvements and better workflows but I
definitely think we reach an important milestone :)
As I said, I tryin
+1
I guess I can vote too..
Tested it on mac osx 10.8.4 & on windows 7 64bit
Installs were successfully. With different SDK's and different fp and air.
Regards,
SWEN VAN ZANTEN
Hoofdstraat 160
2171 BL, Sassenheim
Op 31 jul. 2013, om 10:34 heeft Justin Mclean het
volgende geschreven:
> Hi,
>
I'm happy that FM 6.0.1 seems to be working without any major hickups :-)
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: carlos.rov...@gmail.com [mailto:carlos.rov...@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von
Carlos Rovira
Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Juli 2013 15:28
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: IntelliJ - Ap
thanks this was really helpful.
It is a little disconcerting though, that the documentation for AS3 shows this
class is supposed to be available as of OSMF 1.0, which is the version that is
supposed to be in Flex
(http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/org/osmf/net/M
I have just checked in the flex-utilities/FXGTools project which supports
the following:
a) Converting an FXG file containing a Library of symbols (created in Adobe
Illustrator) into individual FXG files
b) Optimize i.e. clean up the FXG generated by tools like AI, Photoshop,
etc. by removing the
> PS Anyone notice that the time taken to download the AIR SDK from Adobe is
> getting worse or is that just me?
>
>
You are right - the SDK has been getting bigger and bigger:
http://helpx.adobe.com/air/kb/archived-air-sdk-version.html
Om
Hi,
+1 (binding)
Tested on OSX and Australian locale (hard to distinguished from US can't recall
if there are any differences).
1. MD5 and signed packages check out. And although the key is not a trusted key
(ie not in Apache web of trust), it is placed where only a committer would have
acces
46 matches
Mail list logo
