I'm happy that FM 6.0.1 seems to be working without any major hickups :-)

Chris


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: carlos.rov...@gmail.com [mailto:carlos.rov...@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von 
Carlos Rovira
Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Juli 2013 15:28
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: IntelliJ - ApacheFlex4.9.1 - flexmojos 6.0.1

Hi,

just let you know that my pull request was accepted and now Apache Flex
4.9.1 and Flexmojos 6.0.1 is the base of the starling framework maven build

:)

Carlos


2013/7/30 Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>

> Hi,
>
> just let you know that I made a pull request to starling framework to 
> upgrade to flexmojos 6.0.1 and Apache Flex for building starling maven 
> artifact.
>
> https://github.com/PrimaryFeather/Starling-Framework/pull/372
>
> still if anyone knowns something about the "Adobe" text info in the 
> swf tag I was referring in my email and can help to unveil the mystery 
> that is welcome :)
>
> Best
>
> Carlos
>
> 2013/7/29 Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>
>
>> This is the public link to my screenshot that was not attached in my
>> email:
>>
>>
>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/8496144/swfinspector_starlingapac
>> heflex_491.png
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/7/29 Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was trying to build Starling Framework with flexmojos 6.0.1 
>>> upgrading the starling pom from 4.6.0 to 4.9.1 and testing IntelliJ 
>>> new Cardea EAP where we finally get the fix to build with flexmojos Apache 
>>> Flex SDK.
>>>
>>> All seems to go ok and I get successful compilation in both ways:
>>> running pom and using "Make" with IntelliJ. This is very good news 
>>> since we really have an IDE that supports Apache Flex SDK with maven 
>>> using new flexmojos 6.0.1 version and is not tied to adobe namespace.
>>>
>>> To see that output is ok I use SWFInspector to search inside 
>>> library.swf inside the generated starling output swc library
>>>
>>> And I see this tag (see attached screenshot capture)
>>>
>>> <ProductInfo product='Adobe Flex' edition='' version='4.9'
>>> build='1447119' compileDate='Mon Jul 29 09:56:41 2013 UTC'/>
>>>
>>> Seems all is ok with version numbers but ProductInfo is "Adobe Flex"
>>> instead of "Apache Flex".
>>>
>>> It seems that there's some "Adobe" literal yet in the SDK code? 
>>> Someone knows what could be happen?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Carlos Rovira
>>> Director de Tecnología
>>> M: +34 607 22 60 05
>>> F:  +34 912 94 80 80
>>> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>>> http://www.directwriter.es
>>> http://www.avant2.es
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> Director de Tecnología
>> M: +34 607 22 60 05
>> F:  +34 912 94 80 80
>> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>> http://www.directwriter.es
>> http://www.avant2.es
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> Director de Tecnología
> M: +34 607 22 60 05
> F:  +34 912 94 80 80
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.directwriter.es
> http://www.avant2.es
>



--
Carlos Rovira
Director de Tecnología
M: +34 607 22 60 05
F:  +34 912 94 80 80
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.directwriter.es
http://www.avant2.es

Reply via email to