RE: Squiggly not working

The files in spelling.framework.ui seem to be new versions of the same files in spelling.ui? -Original Message- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Sent: 06 September 2014 05:52 To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Squiggly not working On 9/5/14 6:33 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:

Re: Squiggly not working

On 9/5/14 6:33 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >I took a closer look and this may be an issue - a few of the Squiggly >code swcs are smaller than the Adobe ones. > >The Adobe download doesn't include code so it's a bit hard to tell what >may be missing. Alex were any source files omitted from

Re: Squiggly web page

Hi, Done. justin

Re: Squiggly not working

Hi, I took a closer look and this may be an issue - a few of the Squiggly code swcs are smaller than the Adobe ones. The Adobe download doesn't include code so it's a bit hard to tell what may be missing. Alex were any source files omitted from the ActionScript directories the donation or not

Re: Squiggly not working

Hi Raj, Thanks for testing. I've not doubled checked but I think you need both ApacheFlexSpellingUI.swc and ApacheFlexSpellingUIEx.swc for it to work with spark components. While the swc's have different names the common classes (SpellUI + SpellingContextMenu) have the same package name (com.

Re: Squiggly dictionaries license

Hi, > Also, when you wanted to add copyright to LICENSE for Open-Sans font, the > instructions from legal-discuss was to not do that. Actually no - they said it was not part of the meeting the minimum legal requirements of something that was Apache licensed not MIT / BSD licenses. A very big di

Re: Squiggly web page

Sure. Instead of "General requirements" I would say "Requirements for compiling source" or "To compile the source code you need". And for the next header (currently "Software Dependencies") I'd say "Requirements for using Squiggly binaries" or "To use the binaries you need". On 5 September 2014 11

Re: [LAZY] Enabling Github pull requests in Apache Flex

On 9/5/14 11:18 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >Can you make me a moderator? No. Only Infra can. I have requested that you get added as moderator to dev@. If you want to moderate others, let me know. -Alex

Re: [LAZY] Enabling Github pull requests in Apache Flex

Can you make me a moderator? Thanks, Om On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Technically, there are several moderators on dev@ who are faster at > moderating than I am. Last one I saw from git@git.a.o was titled > "[GitHub] flex-sdk pull request: Fix MenuBar.styleChanged() cra

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-asjs #200

The change from Firefox to IE I made seemed to cause more problems than solve. So, I have reverted to Firefox again. Looks like Jenkins likes this. Thanks, Om On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:07 AM, wrote: > See > >

Re: [LAZY] Enabling Github pull requests in Apache Flex

Technically, there are several moderators on dev@ who are faster at moderating than I am. Last one I saw from git@git.a.o was titled "[GitHub] flex-sdk pull request: Fix MenuBar.styleChanged() crash bug" and from you. I think there were 3 total with that subject. If another PR gets processed, th

Re: [LAZY] Enabling Github pull requests in Apache Flex

I am not sure I saw the emails. What was the last email you moderated through? Thanks, Om On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > OK, that should be done now. Is everything else working as expected? > > On 9/4/14 10:31 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: > > >On Sep 4, 2014 10:23

Re: AW: AW: Changing our release strategy?

I don't know BlazeDS that well. What needs to be re-written to make a new turnkey war work? Will customers with existing wars need to upgrade them to use the Apache Flex version of BlazeDS as well? I'm fine with moving stuff to an attic branch, but I'm just wondering if we're seeing warning sign

AW: AW: Changing our release strategy?

Ok so let me re-phrase my mail, there are a lot of testcases that will definitely not work with the current build. Not even the build will work. I agree, having a turnkey war with examples is a good thing, but in order to have this, we would need to re-write most of that code anyway. Perhaps

Re: [DISCUSSION] TourDeFlex 1.1 RC 1

> > >> Found one potential blocker: There is a file misspelled as > >>CONTRIBITING. > >> I know it is a nit of sorts but makes us look bad to ship with > >> misspellings like that. > > > >IMO not a blocker. If that is a blocker then there a 100s other things > >that could be considered as such and

Re: Squiggly dictionaries license

On 9/5/14 6:47 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> I'll ask on legal-discuss > >Again IMO there no need to ask - all we have to do is comply with minimal >legal requirements - which we certainly are. If we happen to do a little >more than required that's not actually against the rules and in m

Re: AW: Changing our release strategy?

On 9/5/14 5:51 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: > >Well then: Please help with the legal issues required to release BlazeDS >:-) >I would even recommend to clean up the project and throw out the old >stuff surrounding the "modules" directory, which seems to be the only >part that's needed. I would l

Re: Migrating Flex PMD to latest PMD version

On 9/5/14 3:32 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >So I haven't dropped the ball ... I am just expecting to have a little >stall on my work here. I'm certainly not pushing anyone to rush on this stuff. I'm just happy you are even trying. Thanks, -Alex

Re: [DISCUSSION] TourDeFlex 1.1 RC 1

On 9/5/14 12:07 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Found one potential blocker: There is a file misspelled as >>CONTRIBITING. >> I know it is a nit of sorts but makes us look bad to ship with >> misspellings like that. > >IMO not a blocker. If that is a blocker then there a 100s other things

Squiggly not working

Hi Team, Lately I was testing the squiggly framework and found that it is not working for spark components while it goes well with mx components. Followings are my findings, 1. The size of "ApacheFlexSpellingUIEx.swc" is just 2KB. This is required for spark components. (I wondered there m

Re: Squiggly dictionaries license

Hi, > I'll ask on legal-discuss Again IMO there no need to ask - all we have to do is comply with minimal legal requirements - which we certainly are. If we happen to do a little more than required that's not actually against the rules and in may actually be the right thing to do when we are u

Re: Squiggly dictionaries license

I'll ask on legal-discuss On 9/4/14 11:52 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> What do you think of the idea of not having the dictionaries in Git and >> having the release packaging script get them? > >Means a release package script could be broken if the latest version >don't work for some rea

AW: Changing our release strategy?

Hi Justin, forget my last sentence ;-) I noticed one project using some flex maven plugin I had never heard of before and thought it was Squiggly but as I couldn't find the module I wanted to post, I sort of forgot to delete that partial sentence. Well then: Please help with the legal issues re

Re: Changing our release strategy?

Hi, > What I will personally put more effort in, is finally releasing the > Mavenizer. After that's done I could release Flexmojos 7.1 ... in my opinion > BlazeDS should already be in a releasable state. Legally releasable may be the issue here, as I said quite a few times happy to help out get

Changing our release strategy?

Hi, As I have seen more and more dependencies between the different parts of the Flex ecosystem, I just added a diagram to our Wiki https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Subproject+Dependencies I added the p

Re: Migrating Flex PMD to latest PMD version

> > But going though the individual fragments of FlexPMD I noticed that again > we have a rudimentary parser for ActionScript. That parses AS code and > creates an Abstract Syntax Tree from this an which the FlexPMD rules > operate ... now I was thinking ... how would it be, if FlexPMD referenced >

AW: Migrating Flex PMD to latest PMD version

Was just reading this article (I had read it before and still think there is currently no option to add support for flex to PMD without adding this to the PMD project). http://pmd.sourceforge.net/pmd-5.1.3/new-language.html In our FlexPMD project we generally have two parts ... a GUI editor/view

AW: Migrating Flex PMD to latest PMD version

Just for the reference ... I pushed my changes to the feature branch "feature/flexpmd-pmd-update" ... Chris Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Freitag, 5. September 2014 12:32 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Migrating Flex PMD to latest PMD version Hi, ev

Re: Squiggly web page

Hi, > Could we find a way to specify that Squiggly in binary mode only > depends on the dictionaries, while in source mode, to be built, it > also depends on java, ant, and flex? That's in the README but if you think it can be clearer please suggest some changes. Thanks, Justin

Migrating Flex PMD to latest PMD version

Hi, even if I got a lot of stuff working with FlexPMD, I was still having problems with the report-plugins for maven complaining about API incompatabilities. It seems that this is due to changes in the maven report and site plugin. I decided not to fix these problems, but so solve them by upda

Re: Squiggly web page

Could we find a way to specify that Squiggly in binary mode only depends on the dictionaries, while in source mode, to be built, it also depends on java, ant, and flex? I'm worried that some flex developers might not download/use the swcs thinking that it's too complicated to set them up. On 5 Sep

Re: Builds and Mustella down

As access to the VMs via RDP requires you having the log in credentials, I'll contact you off list in a short while :-) EdB On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Tom Chiverton wrote: > I'm happy to keep a tab open and check it. > > Is the restart procedure on our Wiki somewhere ? > > Tom > > On 05

Re: [DISCUSSION] TourDeFlex 1.1 RC 1

Ok Thanks Justin will play with this at the weekend. :) Piotr - Apache Flex Committer piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-TourDeFlex-1-1-RC-1-tp40452p40481.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mail

Re: Builds and Mustella down

I'm happy to keep a tab open and check it. Is the restart procedure on our Wiki somewhere ? Tom On 05/09/14 09:28, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Basically check the web interface if the builds have run successfully over > the previous period. All builds should run at least once daily, and the > Mustell

Re: Builds and Mustella down

Basically check the web interface if the builds have run successfully over the previous period. All builds should run at least once daily, and the Mustella runs all run on average twice a day. If they haven't run according to that schedule, something is up, and one must take action. Mostly this com

Re: [DISCUSSION] TourDeFlex 1.1 RC 1

Hi, > why. Check hashes and signatures - do you have some tool for this - hashes > and signatures of what ? I have some scripts set up, but its easy enough via the command line. On OSX: gpg --verify apache-flex-tour-de-flex-component-explorer-1.1-src.tar.gz.asc gpg --verify apache-flex-tour-de-f

Re: Builds and Mustella down

What would this entail ? Tom On 04/09/14 09:29, Erik de Bruin wrote: > This is part of the reason why these VMs need daily monitoring, and that is > why I asked for volunteers to take that off my hands.

Re: [DISCUSSION] TourDeFlex 1.1 RC 1

Thanks Justin! I thought that I should do something special for TourDeFlex I don't know why. Check hashes and signatures - do you have some tool for this - hashes and signatures of what ? I'm not sure how to proceed with TourDeFlex on hashes and signatures. I will do this through the weekend. Pi

Re: [DISCUSSION] TourDeFlex 1.1 RC 1

Hi, > Found one potential blocker: There is a file misspelled as CONTRIBITING. > I know it is a nit of sorts but makes us look bad to ship with > misspellings like that. IMO not a blocker. If that is a blocker then there a 100s other things that could be considered as such and we would never re