On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Greg Dove wrote:
> As a former degrafa contributor, just a quick note to point out that the
> svg path arc implementation is described by w3 here:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/implnote.html#ArcImplementationNotes
>
> this is what the code from degrafa was doing and
As a former degrafa contributor, just a quick note to point out that the
svg path arc implementation is described by w3 here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/implnote.html#ArcImplementationNotes
this is what the code from degrafa was doing and whatever variation of it
was found in svgweb.
Greg Dove
D
On 9/9/14 5:38 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>>> or list where the code came form in another file,
>> Our last instructions are to do so in the LICENSE file.
>
>For a binary file whose license wasn't immediately clear. Here we have a
>source file with an Apache header, this is clearly cover
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
> I tried that and it did not work (because the fill and stroke were not
> set), so I changed my itemRenderer to create the Rect at the point of use:
>
> protected function drawBar():void
> {
> if (this.width > 0 && this.height >
Hi,
>> or list where the code came form in another file,
> Our last instructions are to do so in the LICENSE file.
For a binary file whose license wasn't immediately clear. Here we have a source
file with an Apache header, this is clearly covered by [1].
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.or
I guess we've hit another disagreement. I'm not sure we need a ruling
right away and since Justin says the topic is under debate in the
incubator, I think we should go with our last instructions for now and get
a final ruling later.
On 9/9/14 4:13 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>Under the terms o
Hi,
Anyone else have anything to add? If not I'll try and make a new RC, start a
new vote (and carry over existing votes) later tonight (12 hours or so).
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> I want to include the svgweb version since they have made all the
> modifications that I want and hence easily plugs into the Path api.
Probably what should of happened was text added to their NOTICE file when the
header was changed and then we would of carried that over to our NOTICE file
Hi,
> The second entry in the Installer LICENSE for the updater is not a binary.
> Are you saying we did that wrong?
I'd say it's not required. Having extra stuff in LICENSE is not a legal issue
as the minimum requirements have been met, but they may not need to be there.
> You are correct that
The second entry in the Installer LICENSE for the updater is not a binary.
Are you saying we did that wrong?
You are correct that it isn't "legally required" by the AL. As I said in
my email, it appears to be a convention, not even policy, and we started
following that convention with the Instal
Hi,
> Are you saying this change, which you advocated, was wrong? Was there a
> reversal of the thread somewhere?
Neither - see my other email and the original thread on legal.
> Can you point me to a podling or two that got rejected for doing this for AL
> 3rd party content?
Off top of head
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Again, I am not an authority, but I believe permissive licenses like
> Apache and MIT allow for re-licensing. The question is, which work do you
> want to include?
>
I want to include the svgweb version since they have made all the
modificatio
Hi,
The issue with Open Sans font is different as it is a binary not a source file.
It's Apache licensed but not obviously so. Most Apache licences software have
source headers so you know how they were licensed, but a binary font file
doesn't have a source header that's easily readable (the me
Again, I am not an authority, but I believe permissive licenses like
Apache and MIT allow for re-licensing. The question is, which work do you
want to include?
-Alex
On 9/9/14 3:10 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>Okay, time to reset this conversation. I was digging deeper and found a
>comme
On 9/9/14 2:57 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Please do not do this. There have been several incubator projects who's
>release candidates have been rejected for including Apache licensed
>software in LICENSE. If something is Apache licensed 3rd party or not
>there is no need to add it to LIC
Okay, time to reset this conversation. I was digging deeper and found a
comment on the class in svgweb that mentions that this code actually came
from the Degrafa library [1]
Degrafa is released under MIT license [2].
I guess this means that we still have to add this under the subcomponents
area
Hi,
Please do not do this. There have been several incubator projects who's release
candidates have been rejected for including Apache licensed software in
LICENSE. If something is Apache licensed 3rd party or not there is no need to
add it to LICENSE. [1]
> Yes. And we should make a note tha
Hi,
>> -Every line of code was written by somebody, and therefore copyrighted by
>> that somebody (or their employer).
Depends on the actually LICENSE. If you look at [1] you see that it states:
2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this
License, each Contributor
I tried that and it did not work (because the fill and stroke were not
set), so I changed my itemRenderer to create the Rect at the point of use:
protected function drawBar():void
{
if (this.width > 0 && this.height > 0)
{
if (filledRect == null) filledRect = new Rect();
Ah, I see what's happening. My code expects the drawXXX() [drawRect,
drawPath, etc.] to be called before adding it as an element to the parent.
Try switching
this.filledRect = new org.apache.flex.core.graphics.Rect();
this.addElement(this.filledRect);
to
this.filledRect = new org.apache.flex.c
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
> I created a temporary item renderer to see how the x-compile would work.
> Here is the code in my temporary item renderer that creates the Rect:
>
> org.apache.flex.charts.supportClasses.TempBoxRenderer.prototype.set_data =
> function(value) {
>
I created a temporary item renderer to see how the x-compile would work.
Here is the code in my temporary item renderer that creates the Rect:
org.apache.flex.charts.supportClasses.TempBoxRenderer.prototype.set_data =
function(value) {
org.apache.flex.charts.supportClasses.TempBoxRenderer.base
*
Is there any chance that this is related to Apache Flex SDK - rather than
an Adobe AIR issue?
*
When I push out an update for one of my desktop AIR apps that a client may
have installed on a Windows 7 or 8 machine, the shortcuts to the app become
broken and therefore useless. This give
On 9/9/14 11:39 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Thanks Alex! The way you explain it helps me to (finally) understand how
>this stuff fits together.
>
>Would you mind if I put that information in the Wiki, for future reference
>and instruction?
I suppose, but again, it isn't authoritative. Also, I
On 9/9/14 11:18 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>I will just bring that file as is with their headers and copyright info.
>And make static calls to methods in that class.
>
>Just to be clear, is it okay to copy that file as is into our codebase?
Yes. And we should make a note that it is third-
Thanks Alex! The way you explain it helps me to (finally) understand how
this stuff fits together.
Would you mind if I put that information in the Wiki, for future reference
and instruction?
EdB
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 9/9/14 9:51 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Peter Ent wrote:
> Have run into a problem on the JS side. Firebox is telling me that in this
> code from GraphicShape.js:
>
> org.apache.flex.core.graphics.GraphicShape.prototype.addedToParent =
> function() {
> var bbox = this.element.getBBox();
> this.resize
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 9/9/14 9:51 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
> >Not to poke my nose to deep into what is shaping up to be one of those
> >nice
> >and informative legal threads, but I think I may have a relevant question:
> >if some bit of code is AL, is ther
On 9/9/14 9:51 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Not to poke my nose to deep into what is shaping up to be one of those
>nice
>and informative legal threads, but I think I may have a relevant question:
>if some bit of code is AL, is there a 'legal' way to rip it apart and put
>it back together again,
>
> >> As part of this implementation, I borrowed the drawEllipicalArc() method
> >> from the svgweb library(flash implementation of SVG) [1] The code is
> >> Apache licensed. I have added the link to the original code as a
> >>comment
> >> in our code. Do I need to mention this in the NOTICE or
+1
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> - artefact name good
> - LICENE and NOTICE good
> - README and RELEASE_NOTE good
> - signatures and MD5 correct
> - all source files have headers
> - no unexpected binaries in source release
> - can compile from src
On 9/9/14 1:30 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> As part of this implementation, I borrowed the drawEllipicalArc() method
>> from the svgweb library(flash implementation of SVG) [1] The code is
>> Apache licensed. I have added the link to the original code as a
>>comment
>> in our code. D
Have run into a problem on the JS side. Firebox is telling me that in this
code from GraphicShape.js:
org.apache.flex.core.graphics.GraphicShape.prototype.addedToParent =
function() {
var bbox = this.element.getBBox();
this.resize(this.x_, this.y_, bbox.width + this.x_ * 2, bbox.height +
this.
Yep there are plans to do that ... as soon as we have the other stuff out the
door ;-)
At least I have some plans for it.
Chris
Von: Eliezer Reis
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. September 2014 16:50
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: BlazeDS released version
Go
Go ahead.
By the way, there's any intention to improve blazeds? Or, lets everybody
use granite? ;)
2014-09-09 11:08 GMT-03:00 Maurice Amsellem :
> Hi
>
> A colleague of mine told me of the following:
>
> BlazeDS "Latest Releases" to the bottom of the page
> http://flex.apache.org/ says
> BlazeDS:
The update to handle 'A' and 'a' works great! Thanks.
Peter Ent
Adobe Systems
On 9/9/14 3:42 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:53 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
>>
>>> I haven't tried the JS side - this is all Fla
+1 (binding)
-Message d'origine-
De : lluuccaa1 [mailto:lluucc...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi 9 septembre 2014 12:09
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [VOTE} Accept FlatSpark Theme Donation
+1
On 9 September 2014 11:16, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
> +1 (binding)Frédéric THOMAS
>
> > From:
Hi
A colleague of mine told me of the following:
BlazeDS "Latest Releases" to the bottom of the page http://flex.apache.org/
says
BlazeDS: 4.6.0 (Nov 2011)
and points to http://sourceforge.net/adobe/blazeds/wiki/Home/
However, the latest released (not the nightly builds) version of BlazeDS se
Whoever did it - Thanks for the correction! :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Write-Access-to-the-Wiki-tp15375p40599.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archiv
Am 09.09.2014 um 06:27 schrieb piotrz:
Hi Guys,
I see misspelled surname on this page.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Graduation+Resolution
Nicholas Kwaitkowski - should be Nicholas Kwiatkowski
Corrected.
Stephan
+1
On 9 September 2014 11:16, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
> +1 (binding)Frédéric THOMAS
>
> > From: aha...@adobe.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE} Accept FlatSpark Theme Donation
> > Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 16:50:50 +
> >
> > Didn't see any objection in the discuss thread, so time
+1 (binding)Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE} Accept FlatSpark Theme Donation
> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 16:50:50 +
>
> Didn't see any objection in the discuss thread, so time for the official
> vote. I saw a note on an Apache incubator page sa
Hi,
> As part of this implementation, I borrowed the drawEllipicalArc() method
> from the svgweb library(flash implementation of SVG) [1] The code is
> Apache licensed. I have added the link to the original code as a comment
> in our code. Do I need to mention this in the NOTICE or LICENSE file
Yup.
Tom
On 08/09/14 20:22, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> Can someone respond to this comment on our blog, please?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From:
> Date: Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:19 PM
> Subject: Comment: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 released
> To: bigosma...@apache.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:53 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
>
>> I haven't tried the JS side - this is all Flash. In SVG, the fill takes
>> care of closing the path; I'm not using any line or border.
>>
>>
> Yes, it looks like the A parameter is
45 matches
Mail list logo
