SharedResources

Hi all, I ran into a problem with locale bundles: An example: setting locale to nl_NL and diving into resourceManager (ResourceManagerImpl.as:855), the wrong bundle is assiciated with my locale. Check out this: http://www.archemedia.eu/flex/images/wrongBundle.png

Re: [4.14.1] no help, no release

On 3/17/15, 10:28 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote: >I think FlexJS has it own reason to live and could be a great option for >people out there, but it need a muscle and union of mind that we don't >have >today. So it's difficult. It would need real investment of resources and >some top companies pushi

Re: [4.14.1] no help, no release

About JS frameworks, The only option I've been looking recently that makes make think "this could be something like flex" (but it's not today), is Google Dart + Polymer Dart. I think Dart is a cool technology and seems google is pushing it, but in the background behind AngularJS. But there's OOP, c

Re: [4.14.1] no help, no release

On 3/17/15, 8:19 PM, "kevin.godell" wrote: >When the 4.14.1 RC became available, I noticed that the 4.15 nightly is no >longer available in the windows apache flex installer. Is that the way it >is >supposed to work? Is 4.14.1 made from the nightly? Forgive my ignorance, >but >I am trying to fo

Re: [Installer 3.2] Release branch cut

On 3/17/15, 4:11 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Just OTOH, anything ending with .tar.gz or .zip goes the old road. > >From the stats (ignoring the SSL issue) the larger files fail more >frequently so I'm not sure why you would do that? Am I misisng something? I could be missing something

Re: [4.14.1] no help, no release

When the 4.14.1 RC became available, I noticed that the 4.15 nightly is no longer available in the windows apache flex installer. Is that the way it is supposed to work? Is 4.14.1 made from the nightly? Forgive my ignorance, but I am trying to follow along and stay up to date with the latest develo

[4.14.1] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14.1 nightly build 90: Successful

flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #90 - Successful Changes since last build: [bigosmallm] Fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34772 [bigosmallm] Update RELEASE_NOTES with latest feature addition For more information, check the console output at http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.n

[4.14.1] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14.1 nightly build 89: Successful

flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #89 - Successful Changes since last build: No changes For more information, check the console output at http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/89/.

Re: [Installer 3.2] Release branch cut

Hi, > Just OTOH, anything ending with .tar.gz or .zip goes the old road. From the stats (ignoring the SSL issue) the larger files fail more frequently so I'm not sure why you would do that? Am I misisng something? Thanks, Justin

Re: [Installer 3.2] Release branch cut

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Just OTOH, anything ending with .tar.gz or .zip goes the old road. > OTOH usually means "on the other hand". It appears to me that you meant "off the top of my head" which is OTTOMH. (Adjusts spectacles) Confused me while reading. Thanks,

Re: [Installer 3.2] Release branch cut

Just OTOH, anything ending with .tar.gz or .zip goes the old road. -Alex On 3/17/15, 7:13 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: >My only concern is that I dont think there is a clear delineation for what >is "big" and small, and I don't want to break configs that were working. > >I'll be back home

Re: AW: [RESULT] [VOTE] [BlazeDS] Release of Apache BlazeDS 4.7.0 RC2

Congratulations! And thanks for making it happen. I have a couple of process tweaks that the PMC has explicitly or tacitly agreed upon that should be part of the next release you RM, but I don’t want to spoil this thread with the details. We can discuss when you get to that point. For now, take

[Installer 3.2] # Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 nightly build 10: Successful

flex-utilities_installer_release-candidate - Build #10 - Successful Changes since last build: No changes For more information, check the console output at http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-utilities_installer_release-candidate/10/.

Re: [FlexJS] Error during downloading with MD5 signature

On 3/17/15, 2:31 PM, "piotrz" wrote: >Thanks Alex it worked perfectly, but everything is weights 1.6 GB. I see >some >additional things inside folder "in" - I am wondering whether I need these >archives "apache-flex-sdk-4.12.1-bin.zip" or >"apache-flex-falconjx-0.0.3-bin.zip". - Probably I can

Re: [FlexJS] Error during downloading with MD5 signature

Thanks Alex it worked perfectly, but everything is weights 1.6 GB. I see some additional things inside folder "in" - I am wondering whether I need these archives "apache-flex-sdk-4.12.1-bin.zip" or "apache-flex-falconjx-0.0.3-bin.zip". - Probably I can remove it without the problem. Piotr -

Re: [FlexJS] Error during downloading with MD5 signature

Hi Piotr, If you’ve grabbed the nightly binary distribution build from [2], then all you need to follow is the instructions in the READme about using the Binary Distribution, which should just be to run ant -f installer.xml -Alex [2] http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-asjs/last

Re: [FlexJS] Error during downloading with MD5 signature

Alex, I've started to look closer to this, but I'm not sure whether I'm looking into right things. In order to use ant installer script for download I have to follow this [1] instruction ? [1] http://ftp.piotrkosoft.net/pub/mirrors/ftp.apache.org/flex/flexjs/0.0.2/READme Piotr - Apache F

[4.14.1] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14.1 nightly build 88: Successful

flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #88 - Successful Changes since last build: [bigosmallm] Add contributors list for 4.14.1 [bigosmallm] Update RELEASE_NOTES with the bug fixes and performance enhancements that go into this release For more information, check the console output at http://apac

Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] Now I need a little help with FlexJS ;-)

I¹ve run into this problem too on a new machine. I can understand copying them from the flex-sdk, but it is not doing so. I looked in the downloads.xml in flex-asjs/frameworks/as and the index.template.html is just not getting copied. I would fix it but I don¹t see what is wrong with it. ‹peter

Re: [4.14.1] no help, no release

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > >> What needs to be done for the SDK (at least): > >> - the docs need updating/completing > >> > > If I understand correct, that means the README and RELEASE_NOTES. I can > > start working on this right away. Are there any other docs to b

Re: [4.14.1] no help, no release

>> What needs to be done for the SDK (at least): >> - the docs need updating/completing >> > If I understand correct, that means the README and RELEASE_NOTES. I can > start working on this right away. Are there any other docs to be updated? CONTRIBUTORS? >> What needs to be done for the Install

Re: [4.14.1] no help, no release

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Wow, does GMail not like two threads with the same subject on > different mailing lists... :-) > > Anyway, back on dev@: > > The release process is where it was when it was started: > > - the branches are cut > - the tests are running on th

AW: [RESULT] [VOTE] [BlazeDS] Release of Apache BlazeDS 4.7.0 RC2

Ok .. and I had to do it again as it had to be send from an @apache.org email ;-) -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christofer Dutz [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de] Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. März 2015 18:47 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: AW: [RESULT] [VOTE] [BlazeDS] Release of Apache B

Re: [4.14.1] no help, no release

> Okay, let me rephrase my question. What needs to be done next? I am still > not clear how the less-RC process is supposed to progress. LessRC is easy: 1. develop 2. cut branch 3. stabilize/prepare/test 4. create RC 5. vote 6. release We are now, for both projects, in step 3. We can only pro

Re: [4.14.1] no help, no release

Wow, does GMail not like two threads with the same subject on different mailing lists... :-) Anyway, back on dev@: The release process is where it was when it was started: - the branches are cut - the tests are running on those branches - the JIRA for the SDK release is created and updated - the

Re: [4.14.1] no help, no release

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > We are were we started: the branches are cut, the builds are running, > the SDK release JIRA is created and updated, and... nothing. > > Let's take this back to dev@ > We are in dev@ :-) Okay, let me rephrase my question. What needs to b

Re: [4.14.1] no help, no release

We are were we started: the branches are cut, the builds are running, the SDK release JIRA is created and updated, and... nothing. Let's take this back to dev@ EdB On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:16 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > On Mar 16, 2015 11:33 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> T

AW: [RESULT] [VOTE] [BlazeDS] Release of Apache BlazeDS 4.7.0 RC2

Ok ... announce message is out ... Think our website now needs a little love :-) - Latest releases (right at the bottom should now reference our release) - Download Flex section should be extended At least this was what I found with a quick look ... could someone here do that? Haven't updated th

[FlexUnit] [Falcon]

I got a new computer and am in the process of making it usable WRT the Apache Flex projects. I'm finding things "cloudy" (and not in the data-storage sense). I am writing down issues I run into and their resolutions so they can be incorporated into the READMEs. Since this is a new machine (Mac

Re: [4.14.1] no help, no release

On Mar 16, 2015 11:33 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > > Hi, > > This message is meant for everyone who thinks that if they wait long > enough, a release will spontaneously materialize. Or worse, that > someone else picks up the effort and it will get done anyway. That is > not how Open Source works.

Re: [Installer 3.2] Release branch cut

My only concern is that I dont think there is a clear delineation for what is "big" and small, and I don't want to break configs that were working. I'll be back home on Friday and can push my branch for people to check out and test this weekend. On Mar 16, 2015 5:37 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > I v

Re: Eclipse project files in git

+1 for project files. There are ways to ensure that local, hardcoded paths are not used. We can put them in an ide/[ide name] folder to make it cross ide. Thanks, Om On Mar 17, 2015 6:14 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote: > On 17/03/15 12:38, Darrell Loverin wrote: > >> I've been working on improving

Re: Eclipse project files in git

On 17/03/15 12:38, Darrell Loverin wrote: I've been working on improving the existing Code Coverage Tool in utilities. I'm getting ready to commit the work but I'm not sure whether to commit the Eclipse project files with the code. Are they considered helpful or clutter? I believe that the norm

Re: Eclipse project files in git

Darrell, Awesome news, I'm loving it! As to the project files, I think the opinions are about 50% in favour, 50% against ;-) As an example: some of the SDK projects do have Flash Builder project files, some don't. Personally I like them in version control, as they give new contributors an easier

Eclipse project files in git

I've been working on improving the existing Code Coverage Tool in utilities. I'm getting ready to commit the work but I'm not sure whether to commit the Eclipse project files with the code. Are they considered helpful or clutter? I've attached an example code coverage report from the tool I took w