On 5/28/15, 4:47 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> What indication do you have that the EULA applies to an MPL project at
>> Mozilla?
>
>None and why would I? If the code involved decompiling playerglobal.swc
>then that EULA would apply.
Hmm, well there definitely has been a lot of email ab
Hi,
> What indication do you have that the EULA applies to an MPL project at
> Mozilla?
None and why would I? If the code involved decompiling playerglobal.swc then
that EULA would apply.
Thanks,
Justin
On 5/28/15, 3:00 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Yes, I think that is within the rules. I’d give folks 72 hours to offer
>> opinions though.
>
>A bigger issue may be how this was created, as section 4.5 (no
>modification or reverse engineering) may be an issue. [1]
What indication do you
On 5/28/15, 2:52 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Yes, I think that is within the rules. I’d give folks 72 hours to offer
>> opinions though.
>
>A better option would be to ask Roland to release it under another
>license / dual license it.
I’m pretty sure Roland also copied his files from
Hi,
> Yes, I think that is within the rules. I’d give folks 72 hours to offer
> opinions though.
A bigger issue may be how this was created, as section 4.5 (no modification or
reverse engineering) may be an issue. [1]
Justin
1.
http://wwwimages.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/legal/licenses-
Hi,
> Yes, I think that is within the rules. I’d give folks 72 hours to offer
> opinions though.
A better option would be to ask Roland to release it under another license /
dual license it.
For the exact conditions of what we would need to do see section 3.1, 3.2 and
3.3 of the MPL. [1]
Jus
Hi Erik,
Thanks for your help.
I have setup the tests according to the wiki page, but I have a few
questions:
1. The logical project for my test (i.e. the project containing
mx.collections.ArrayList) seems to be the "framework" project. I am
confused by the name of this project being "frame
Actually, FalconJX probably doesn’t know that the FlexJS widgets are using
goog.events. So, like you said, folks should be writing against the event
model in any JS framework they are using.
I guess this thread encompasses both what the compiler’s dependencies on
goog is as well as the framework w
I'm not sure that it makes sense to include an EventDispatcher with the
vanilla transpiler. So many JS libraries have their own implementations of
events. I wonder if developers would be expecting one to be included, or if
they'd prefer pull in an existing library.
- Josh
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at
> Interesting. Lots of the advice I found suggested string literals. How
> are @expose and @export different such that it helps GCC?
In it's original intent, @expose was meant to be used only to prevent
property collapsing. That's why using it disables a whole bunch of
compiler passes, greatly r
On 5/28/15, 11:46 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>> I think GCC does handle ES5. And there is still active development on
>>it.
>> I’m definitely not a fan of their replacement of @expose with string
>> literals, but is there some other minifier we want to use instead?
>
>GCC handles ES5 just fin
Ah yes, you make me think I didn't stub the things I could have probably avoid
some classes from the swfutils, will do that in the week end
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015
> I’ll try integrating your stuff then. I looked at your changes a few days
> ago and it looked reasonable.
Thanks for that but I pushed force my branch changing some code (in better I
hope) and the build too.
> Just to be sure, does this still require some parts of a regular Flex SDK
> or is a
> I think GCC does handle ES5. And there is still active development on it.
> I’m definitely not a fan of their replacement of @expose with string
> literals, but is there some other minifier we want to use instead?
GCC handles ES5 just fine. Their implementation of the ES6 -> ES5/3
transpilatio
Awesome! I hope to finish up FDB this week and then work on packaging.
I’ll try integrating your stuff then. I looked at your changes a few days
ago and it looked reasonable.
Just to be sure, does this still require some parts of a regular Flex SDK
or is a FlexJS SDK now working on its own?
-Al
Yup. We had this discussion a long time ago.
The defaults of HTML are really kind of odd… ;-)
On May 28, 2015, at 8:24 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
> Ah,
>
> I completely forgot about box-sizing. It turns out that I had set
> box-sizing to border-box in FlexJS defaults.css.
>
> So with border-box set
Alex, I will state again, I am a compiler dev not a javascript dev but I
did do POC of an AMD emitter and it's still in the repo. So if I did AMD
in a couple weeks which I think it was, something else like RequireJS would
be that hard.
I still think since it seems the compiler is getting a rebirt
Almost the end.
So, to come back on this, at the moment with my current implementation, we can
compile Applications and Libraries and link them together overriding the
IntelliJ configuration as show here http://snag.gy/5SzuG.jpg the second build
configuarion suffixed by _JS guess what, is to co
On 5/28/15, 10:56 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Not sure if there is better for UI Events but for the rest I came across
>this article [1], that's a long time it has been written, I don't know if
>it is still valid ?
>
>http://webreflection.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/5-reasons-to-avoid-closure-com
On 5/28/15, 10:43 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>ES5 is my preference too. I think ES6 would be interesting because the
>code
>would look a bit closer to AS3, but with the polyfills and the
>implementations in browsers being pretty new still, I'm wary of adopting
>it
>at this point in time.
OK, so
Not sure if there is better for UI Events but for the rest I came across this
article [1], that's a long time it has been written, I don't know if it is
still valid ?
http://webreflection.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/5-reasons-to-avoid-closure-compiler-in.html
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.c
ES5 is my preference too. I think ES6 would be interesting because the code
would look a bit closer to AS3, but with the polyfills and the
implementations in browsers being pretty new still, I'm wary of adopting it
at this point in time.
- Josh
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
On 5/28/15, 10:30 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>>So maybe it's time for FlexJS to reconsider this dependency... But for
>VFJS I'm planning on using the GC tools to the max, going back to dot
>notation and discarding '@expose'.
I’d do this in FlexJS as well, but we use the underscore to keep Goog
> We are basically using Closure Library based on Erik’s recommendation, but
> at the time I still wanted to support IE8. We are now making the minimum
> IE9 because we want decent SVG support and Object.defineProperties. So,
> now is a good time to revisit how much of Closure Library we need. I
Yeah, I’m thinking somebody took a copy and modified it to generate AS?
On 5/28/15, 10:30 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Ok just seen:
>
>Copyright (C) 2012 Sebastian Loncar, Web: http://loncar.de
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> MIT License
>
>Frédéric T
Ok just seen:
Copyright (C) 2012 Sebastian Loncar, Web: http://loncar.de
MIT License
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [FalconJX] builtin.swc (was Re: [FalconJX] AS for Native
Ah,
I completely forgot about box-sizing. It turns out that I had set
box-sizing to border-box in FlexJS defaults.css.
So with border-box set for box-sizing, it means on the JavaScript/HTML
side, the width and height sizing properties do include padding and
border. This means we can say that the
Wasn't it that it has been implemented by Mike L. ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 13:20:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX] builtin.swc (was Re: [FalconJX] AS for Native HTML JS)
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Alex Harui
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 5/28/15, 9:57 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
> >
> >BTW did you come to any conclusions about that, creating the swc for the
> >DOM? I haven't heard back from Roland.
> >
>
> I was hoping you had powers over Roland to get him to answer ;
On 5/28/15, 10:08 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Btw, I would like to come back on this:
>
>> 1) figure out when to load the polyfill
>
>For ES6: All the time at the moment
>
>> 2) worry about bugs in the polyfill
>
>I guess like any other thirdparty we are using and those polyfills we are
>talk
On 5/28/15, 9:57 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>
>BTW did you come to any conclusions about that, creating the swc for the
>DOM? I haven't heard back from Roland.
>
I was hoping you had powers over Roland to get him to answer ;-)
I don’t know much about IDL. Did Roland write is own “translato
Btw, I would like to come back on this:
> 1) figure out when to load the polyfill
For ES6: All the time at the moment
> 2) worry about bugs in the polyfill
I guess like any other thirdparty we are using and those polyfills we are
talking about are open source, it means as well there are people
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 5/28/15, 9:38 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>
> >I'm not in any hurry. :) The project won't work without a builtin.swc so
> >it
> >has to be created a compiled somehow.
>
> Well, you can use Roland’s just to get started.
>
Yes, this w
I remember I started on an AMD emitter for Frank, it worked with his test
classes. So I guess it will just be as I am writing it to keep everything
separate that I can.
This is like dejava for the 3rd time, I love repeating things or something.
Mike
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Frédéric THO
On 5/28/15, 9:38 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>I'm not in any hurry. :) The project won't work without a builtin.swc so
>it
>has to be created a compiled somehow.
Well, you can use Roland’s just to get started.
>
>As far as Sprite, it's COMPC that sticks it in. So we need to figure out
>wher
I don't see any mention of the box-sizing CSS property. Are you aware of it?
- Josh
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Peter Ent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FlexJS is having a little bit of an identity crisis when it comes to
> layout and dimensions; specially, when it comes to determining the size of
> a c
I'm not in any hurry. :) The project won't work without a builtin.swc so it
has to be created a compiled somehow.
As far as Sprite, it's COMPC that sticks it in. So we need to figure out
where it's doing it.
Mike
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 5/28/15, 9:29 AM, "M
IIUC, there's no ES5 spec to load modules, the reason why there are RequireJS,
AMD, UMD, CommonJS, maybe be I forget some and SystemJS used by Babel because
it uses the ES6 Syntax and handles the way others treat circular references if
there are packed into this ES6 specific format except for Re
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> In one post on another thread today, Josh indicated it would be acceptable
> to have a dependency on goog at least for now just to have something to
> play with. And having a limited amount of goog in the output meets my
> needs so there are
On 5/28/15, 9:29 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>Ok, but what about Roland's comment about removing the Sprite reference in
>the SWC, that doesn't seem kosher to me...?
The builtin.as in github doesn’t list Sprite so I don’t know how it gets
in there. And we could always add a special flag to
Ok, but what about Roland's comment about removing the Sprite reference in
the SWC, that doesn't seem kosher to me...?
So the build would download the text files, save them to disk, create a swc
from that and package it correct?
Mike
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On
In one post on another thread today, Josh indicated it would be acceptable
to have a dependency on goog at least for now just to have something to
play with. And having a limited amount of goog in the output meets my
needs so there are two customers who at least want to try the same thing.
IMO, y
On 5/27/15, 3:00 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>> I would want to get a ruling on that from higher up in Apache. First
>> there is the risk that your site goes away some day. Then there is the
>> question as to whether PMC folks can se
So staying on ES5 means still using goog correct? Josh did mention he would
prefer not to have that dependency, so that means there has to be
alternatives to all your list items.
So really in the JXEmitter's(Josh's use case) case I see an inheritance and
accessor "solution"(Babble outputs) but I d
You probably right, actually I was a bit dreaming I think :)
In more it would mean that all the JS libraries we would use under the wood
would have to be packed in ES6 modules, not sure we could do that.
Now yes, I 'm curious too on what others think about emiting in ES5.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From
On 5/28/15, 8:40 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Oops,
>
>Hmm, so at this point, why not emiting ES6 syntax and use ES6 polyfills
>from babel ?
Possible. I’m willing to go in this direction if that’s what folks want
to do, but I always get nervous when I hear about polyfills. I’d rather
avoid
Hi,
FlexJS is having a little bit of an identity crisis when it comes to layout and
dimensions; specially, when it comes to determining the size of a component.
Flex makes it pretty clear what the .width property returns, for example. We
have been going back and forth on this with FlexJS since
Forgot to respond to this. This deserves its own thread.
I’m open to ideas as to what Responsive UI means in Flex. It isn’t clear
how much we are going to rely on CSS and the browser for layout (I
definitely hope to rely on CSS and the browser for lots of visuals).
I would like FlexJS to suppor
> ES6 polyfills from babel ?
Can you explain exactly what this means?
BTW your link didn't show up.
Mike
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> Hmm, so at this point, why not emiting ES6 syntax and use ES6 polyfills
> from babel ?
>
> For example, for module, from [1] :
>
Oops,
Hmm, so at this point, why not emiting ES6 syntax and use ES6 polyfills from
babel ?
For example, for module, from [1] :
---
Module loaders support:
Dynamic loading
State isolation
Global namespace isolation
Compilation hooks
I would prefer not to have that dependency, but if it helps us avoid some
sticky issues that will slow you down, then let's keep using it for now.
Focusing on the big picture seems more important right now, and we can
clean things up later.
- Josh
On May 28, 2015 8:09 AM, "Michael Schmalle"
wrote
Hmm, so at this point, why not emiting ES6 syntax and use ES6 polyfills from
babel ?
For example, for module, from [1] :
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: [FalconJX][FlexJS] Do we still want to use Google Closure Library?
> (was Re: [FalconJX] JXEmi
Well seems to me it could only be one thing and that is a swc is not setup
correctly that contains the RichTextEditor and it's namespace.
I am guessing the error in laymans is actually say, RichTextEditor is not a
DisplayObject and a FormItem can only have display object children.
But the above i
Starting a new thread:
We are basically using Closure Library based on Erik’s recommendation, but
at the time I still wanted to support IE8. We are now making the minimum
IE9 because we want decent SVG support and Object.defineProperties. So,
now is a good time to revisit how much of Closure Lib
Thanks Mike, that brought me a step further!
I'm facing another problem now:
I used the spark RichTextEditor. When I imported this into FB, the namespace
created was
xmlns:ns="http://flex.apache.org/experimental/ns";
In my mxml:
IJ says that 'Element ns:RichTextEditor is not all
> I suspect Closure is trying to be more backwards compatible. I think
> Object. create() was added in ES5, and maybe they're aiming for ES3 there.
Correct, using Closure we guaranty compatibility < ES5 but I wonder if we are
good to do so, the reason was that companies were very stricks and allo
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Josh Tynjala
wrote:
> Well, the original plan of matching TypeScript's output is fine with me. I
> didn't mean to confuse you by throwing something extra in there. I haven't
> looked as closely at Babel, but I heard good things. I figured knowledge of
> Babel wou
I think it's okay to start with an extra dependency in order to get
something working faster.
- Josh
On May 28, 2015 7:55 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
> On 5/28/15, 6:36 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>
> >So Alex, you are saying try what Bable produces for get/set and make sure
> >I
> >make it s
Well, the original plan of matching TypeScript's output is fine with me. I
didn't mean to confuse you by throwing something extra in there. I haven't
looked as closely at Babel, but I heard good things. I figured knowledge of
Babel would be good to have around to sanity check things in case
TypeScr
Make sure you have the dependencies correct in your build configs and not
just your library setup. There are two parts of IJ, the module setup and
run/debug target setup.
Mike
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Dany Dhondt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Due to the IntelliJ traffic recently, I finally deci
On 5/28/15, 6:36 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>So Alex, you are saying try what Bable produces for get/set and make sure
>I
>make it swappable and not coupled in the emitter right?
I don’t really have a recommendation, just trying to find things in
common. The code in org.apache.flex.utils.L
I recall that I ran into the super getters and setters issue in TypeScript
pretty quickly. I would like to see them working in ActionScript.
- Josh
On May 28, 2015 3:54 AM, "Michael Schmalle"
wrote:
> > I’m still surprised that in 2015, TS hasn’t been forced to handle super.
> Are people not usi
Well see Josh, I am good at writing cross compilers but have spent hardly
any time understanding all the nuances of javascript.
Each time I have written this thing, I have had a spec given to me by
others that I made work. So I am kind of looking for that spec here so I
have something concrete to
Hi all,
Due to the IntelliJ traffic recently, I finally decided to migrate my FB
projects to IJ.
I migrated a large project and several libraries. All were converted to modules
in IJ.
Setup went really well but my first run didn't succeed yet due to several
errors:
Error:(184, 0) [TelraamAdm
I suspect Closure is trying to be more backwards compatible. I think
Object. create() was added in ES5, and maybe they're aiming for ES3 there.
- Josh
On May 28, 2015 7:11 AM, "Michael Schmalle"
wrote:
> See this is where I am clueless, is this a difference between backward
> compatibility or so
You are right:
Chrome Firefox (Gecko) Internet Explorer Opera Safari
5 4.0 (2) 9
11.60 5
For oldest, there are polyfills
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:09:59 -0400
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX] JXE
Yeah, the ES5 output. While I think the output looks good from TypeScript,
I figured it wouldn't hurt to point out an alternative. I'm sure it's
pretty similar, but when it comes to the little details, you might see
something there that you like better.
- Josh
On May 27, 2015 4:01 PM, "Michael Sch
See this is where I am clueless, is this a difference between backward
compatibility or something?
Like Object.create() not all older browsers support?
Mike
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> Btw, this is the diff between Closure and Babel:
>
> goog.inherits = function
Btw, this is the diff between Closure and Babel:
goog.inherits = function (childCtor, parentCtor) {
/** @constructor */
function tempCtor() {
};
tempCtor.prototype = parentCtor.prototype;
childCtor.superClass_ = parentCtor.prototype;
childCtor.prototype = new tempCtor();
@Om
Here is another app that is an easy candiate for FlexJS that is a .caustic
file player. Not to heavy on animated graphics.
http://www.singlecellsoftware.com/node/8897
Mike
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:33 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On May 19, 2015 1:23 PM, "Michael Schmalle"
> wrote:
>
What exactly are you struggling with ?
I've never had to access the GPS from Flex, but it should be straight
forward to follow something like :
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/air/quick_start_as/quickstarts/qs_as_geolocation_api.html
Many databases then offer native co-ordinate operations, failing
So Alex, you are saying try what Bable produces for get/set and make sure I
make it swappable and not coupled in the emitter right?
What are you doing for nested function scopes? Just creating local
variables outside the function and referencing the current scope?
Mike
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:
The result of the empty spark.css [1] :-)
If I let only the NS, it creates the swf but crashes because it can't find
IStateClient2
Frédéric THOMAS
[1]
Error:[DataBindingTest]: : java.lang.NullPointerException at
org.antlr.runtime.tree.BaseTreeAdaptor.isNil(BaseTreeAdaptor.java:73) at
I don’t think commits@ is moderated because it doesn’t get spammed very
much.
-Alex
On 5/28/15, 2:19 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Someone knows how that came in our commit mailing list ?
>
>Frédéric THOMAS
>
>Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 02:02:34 +
>Subject: 【外贸】“人工搜索”PK“智能搜索”，外贸客户开发专家百倍千倍提高您客户
Hi,
We have the requirement to develop "Geo-fence" on mobile devices based on
lang, lat positions.
Could you please, any one help me on how to develop the Geo-fence in Apache
Flex/Action Script.
Thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.na
The mxml-manifest in a FlexJS SDK is empty because FB/Falcon didn’t seem
to care. If IJ is counting on it containing certain things we can
certainly provide one. But it might also scan the frameworks folder
looking for -manifest.xml files.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 5/28/15, 6:09 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" w
FWIW, I did not test goog.inherit against Object.getPrototypeOf. It might
not work as some libraries may not use vanilla prototype inheritance. So
abstracting that piece will provide more flexibility.
-Alex
On 5/28/15, 6:25 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>Fred,
>
>I said TS only because Josh s
Fred,
I said TS only because Josh said it looked nice, the came Josh with Bable
and Joa said Babel.
Right now it's the whole class structure that needs a template.
> Yes but given I'm more than busy, would be nice if you write it first in
AS :)
I meant copy and paste, I didn't mean write it. Do
> You mean if AS3 and ES6 inherit the same way correct? I wouldn't know the
> answer to this I guess all we can do is try it right? :)
Nope, I meant Babel and TS because you said you will base your tests on the TS
ones, so, if you emit a such utility function, be sure first we extend classes
in
> Just quickly, I noticed the gist contains a different set of namespaces,
> therefore excluding all of our new components, and still had a theme
> pointing at spark.css. The flex-config.xml in a FlexJS SDK has a
> different set of manifest.xml files and nothing in the theme tag.
Not sure at all
So, coming back on this, it seems, the only solution at the moment, it is to
pass the arguments directly or maybe a better write a specific plugin, once
again
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Dat
Hi Fred,
Just quickly, I noticed the gist contains a different set of namespaces,
therefore excluding all of our new components, and still had a theme
pointing at spark.css. The flex-config.xml in a FlexJS SDK has a
different set of manifest.xml files and nothing in the theme tag.
I wonder if le
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> > So what is different about this?
> >
> > The only thing I can think of is that we introduce utility functions to
> do
> > the work
>
> Yes, that, I guess both of the language inherit in the same way, if yes,
> this function is re-usable
> So what is different about this?
>
> The only thing I can think of is that we introduce utility functions to do
> the work
Yes, that, I guess both of the language inherit in the same way, if yes, this
function is re-usable IMO
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 08:38:16 -0400
> Subject
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> ...Is it worth trying writing a polite email to the current owners before
> involving trademarks@?..
That might work. If you do so make sure to copy the Flex private list
and mention that in your next board report. It is important to
docume
Well yes, I follow the logic. I don't understand if this is a solution, why
TypeScript doesn't use the same algorithm.
I read what the developers said and they said they had talked about it in
length when the project first started and came to the conclusion there
really is no solution.
So what is
I've got it:
else if ("value" in desc && desc.writable)
If the property is define and writable, set it, otherwise, will use the setter
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [FalconJX] JXEmitter accessors
> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 13:27:47 +0100
Hi,
> The best way to handle this is for this PMC to inform trademarks@a.o
> and ask them for advice on how to proceed.
My guess is that the domain may of changed hands and/or expired and bought by
someone else. Is it worth trying writing a polite email to the current owners
before involving tr
I'm not a javascript guru either, but it was easy to create ES6 classes (left
pane) and see the output (right pane), so, for the setter, it creates:
For class A (simple):
get: function () {
return this._property;
},
set: function (value) {
this._pr
Interesting Fred, I am no javascript guru so I need people to "tell" me
what I should have output.
So let me get this straight, the left pane is ES6 and it converted it to
ES5 in the right pane?
Mike
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> I just tried in babel, see what it g
I just tried in babel, see what it generates:
http://babeljs.io/repl/#?experimental=true&evaluate=true&loose=false&spec=false&code=class%20A%20{%0A%09constructor%28%29%20{%0A%09%20%20this._property%20%3D%20%22init%22%3B%0A%09}%0A%09get%20property%28%29%3Astring%20{%0A%09%09return%20this._property%
Actually, it is more complicated.
This is what it is generated by IJ:
https://gist.github.com/doublefx/ae135f1886cc2800c08d
And I added the flex-config.xml from the framework, this one overrides the one
of IJ apparently
it results:
Information:28/05/2015 11:16 - Compilation completed with 7 e
> I’m still surprised that in 2015, TS hasn’t been forced to handle super.
Are people not using inheritance much in TS?
They tell them to use standard getValue(), setValue() in the property if
they need inheritance overrides.
I'm kind of bummed about this whole thing, I stuck my foot in mouth her
Someone knows how that came in our commit mailing list ?
Frédéric THOMAS
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 02:02:34 +
Subject: 【外贸】“人工搜索”PK“智能搜索”，外贸客户开发专家百倍千倍提高您客户开发效率
From: nichols.statement.33542...@gmail.com
To: comm...@flex.apache.org
当阿里巴巴平台、展会上的询盘越来越少，甚至长时间没有询盘时，您是否有考虑其他客户开发方法和途径呢？
我们通过您的产品关键
Hi,
Adding support for Comp C / JSC, I've been able to compile swc and js files
from IntelliJ.
In IntelliJ, I still have to add the FlexJS as a Lib to have things green
though, also, despite, it passes a correct config.xml, the MXMLC compiler can't
find the classe in the lib (the class is in t
Hi,
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> ...BTW this is not the first time a issue has come up re that domain name. It
> was mentioned
> in the December 2013 board report. [1]...
The best way to handle this is for this PMC to inform trademarks@a.o
and ask them for advice on h
96 matches
Mail list logo
