On 6/6/15, 11:02 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> It is in the report. What issues are still unresolved?
>
>The words Adobe legal wanted removed / changed in order to comply with
>their trademark usage policy, see the last email from you in the
>[RESULT][VOTE] thread.
Hmm. Didn’t think i
Hi,
> It is in the report. What issues are still unresolved?
The words Adobe legal wanted removed / changed in order to comply with their
trademark usage policy, see the last email from you in the [RESULT][VOTE]
thread.
Thanks,
Justin
Maybe add a comment or vote on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8302?
On 6/6/15, 9:26 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>Well I guess the title says it all ... a few weeks ago we were thinking
>of new repos and at least one for flex-maven-plugin.
>
>
>Do I have to do anything rega
On 6/6/15, 9:24 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Ok so I implemented the new option ... could you please give that a try?
>@Alex could you check if Adobe is legally ok with the way I implemented
>it, @Others ... could you check that this option suits your needs?
Let’s make sure others like it fir
On 6/6/15, 9:54 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>>I thought we did resolve issues in Flex 4.14.1. We asked in the last
>> report whether we had to go back and fix old releases. I didn’t see a
>> response so I assume no. Do you want us to ask again?
>
>Perhaps legal@ is the best place to ask? Eith
Hi,
> So can I infer that you don’t have plans to write to them? I don’t want
> to duplicate effort.
I did intent to but have been busy with other stuff. Someone else mind doing it?
> I thought we did resolve issues in Flex 4.14.1. We asked in the last
> report whether we had to go back and fi
Yes. I hope to have some time this week.
@Jason, help on this would be awesome.
On Jun 6, 2015, at 12:55 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Harbs, will you have time to look at the table code’s impact on
> performance?
>
> @Jason. You can get the repos and follow the README file instructions to
> get se
Hi,
Well I guess the title says it all ... a few weeks ago we were thinking of new
repos and at least one for flex-maven-plugin.
Do I have to do anything regarding this?
Chris
Ok so I implemented the new option ... could you please give that a try?
@Alex could you check if Adobe is legally ok with the way I implemented it,
@Others ... could you check that this option suits your needs?
Another thing I would want to change before releasing ... currently the thing
is ca
> Weird. I just tried it from my Eclipse setup and reproduced the
> BURMAbortException. So I’ll debug it on my end over the weekend.
Thanks for trying and good luck with that, I'm totally lost, I also verified
that I receive that has been sent.
Frédéric THOMAS
-
And I see no difference between the old and new FDB in term of output format:
New:
(fdb) print #90372129.
$2 = [Object 90372129, class='controllers::MyController']
app = [Object 57942081, class='DataBindingTest']
queryBegin =
"http://query.yahooapis.com/v1/public/yql?q=select%20*%20from%20yaho
On 6/6/15, 7:35 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>> I assume you can reproduce that from the command-line as well?
>
>Damn, I tried it thru the intellij dev tool to talk directly to the
>debugger and had the same failure, the same command in FDB works !! I'm
>even more lost, the same command sent t
> I assume you can reproduce that from the command-line as well?
Damn, I tried it thru the intellij dev tool to talk directly to the debugger
and had the same failure, the same command in FDB works !! I'm even more lost,
the same command sent to our legacy FDB thru this same IJ tool works too.
On 6/6/15, 4:05 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Did you write to the apacheflex.com owner?
>
>No I would of sent a draft to the list first before sending it.
So can I infer that you don’t have plans to write to them? I don’t want
to duplicate effort.
>> What do you think we should say
I assume you can reproduce that from the command-line as well? IIRC,
print # is not supposed to go to the compiler for
evaluation. Some other code path is supposed to handle it differently.
-Alex
On 6/6/15, 7:05 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>> I would add console output to DebuggerExpressionE
> Regarding IJ’s assumptions about the list of SWCs, we might have to live
> with warnings, but I’m also ok adding in an mx.swc and spark.swc with no
> classes in it if that will make IJ happy. There are some dummy files I
> had to create to make FB happy. We also could put all of the swcs in a
>
> I would add console output to DebuggerExpressionEvaluator to dump the
> expression it is being asked to evaluate. Then try the same expression
> using FDB on the command-line. The chances are high that the BURM is not
> expecting certain kinds of expressions.
I fixed few things to make IJ happy b
Yeah, I am using Java 1.8.0_45. I'll diff what I got versus what we see in
4.14.1.
Chris
Sent from Surface
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 10:06 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
I didn’t get any warnings on Mac or Win 7. Might be a Win 8 thing? Or
maybe you
Hi,
> Did you write to the apacheflex.com owner?
No I would of sent a draft to the list first before sending it.
> My interpretation of Bertrand’s suggestion was that we’d report once someone
> from the PMC tried
> to contact them.
Yep but either way it improtant to mention in the report espe
19 matches
Mail list logo
