Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

Hi, The LICENSE and NOTICE are in the binary .dmg are exactly the same as the ones in the source release. I thought it was discussed and agreed that these should be different? Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

> > build.number=0 > > Ignoring the incorrect dates, should the build.number be 0? > ? EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

Hi, > The LICENSE and NOTICE are in the binary .dmg are exactly the same as the > ones in the source release. I thought it was discussed and agreed that these > should be different? Ah sorry they are different it's just that the extra license info is above the "APACHE FLEX SUBCOMPONENTS” line.

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

Hi, I’m also seeing a compile error, that seems to be related to placement of the NOTICE file? [get] To: /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexSDKInstaller/apache-flex-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src/installer/deps/as3crypto/LICENSE.txt [java] no such file /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/Ap

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

> > Anyone else seeing this or have I done something wrong? > I reported this about an hour ago. EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: [FlexJS] JS.swc does not seem to have any SVG* element defintions

@Om code completion stopping has to be a FB things, really nothing to do with the SWC am pretty sure. @Fred The thing that is missing is properties on an interface in SVG. So the properties problem. There are conflicts with SVG super classes where say Element.style is defined as CSSStyleDeclarati

Re: [FlexJS] JS.swc does not seem to have any SVG* element defintions

HAHA! I got the SWC to compile all SVG with only adding these excludes; config.addExclude("SVGStylable", "className"); config.addExclude("SVGStylable", "style"); config.addExclude("SVGLocatable", "farthestViewportElement"); config.addExclude("SVGLocatable", "nearestViewportElement"); The all 200

Re: [FlexJS] JS.swc does not seem to have any SVG* element defintions

Awesome! I’ll add svg.js to the build script. On 6/18/15, 4:14 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: >HAHA! > >I got the SWC to compile all SVG with only adding these excludes; > >config.addExclude("SVGStylable", "className"); >config.addExclude("SVGStylable", "style"); >config.addExclude("SVGLocatable

Re: [2/2] git commit: [flex-utilities] [refs/heads/develop] - moved new items to below header

Justin, The “header” says "Your use of the source code” but we are not bundling the source code for these differences in the binary license. Or maybe it is too early in the morning for me. -Alex On 6/18/15, 2:20 AM, "jmcl...@apache.org" wrote: >moved new items to below header > > >Project: ht

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

On 6/18/15, 1:50 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >> >> Anyone else seeing this or have I done something wrong? >> > >I reported this about an hour ago. Well, so much for the less-RC process. I’ll roll out another RC in about 9 hours. -Alex

[FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

Hi, I decided I needed to give myself a severe headache, so I decided to tackle JQuery externals! Well 4 hours later and some swearing, I got it working pretty well, I had to exclude a couple "inner classes", for the most part, it is very usable. 1. This needs to be added to the build file (con

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

Fantastic! This is huge. I will build something with it as soon as you check it in. Any chance you can bring in d3.js as well? This looks like a good source: https://github.com/federico-b/d3-externs On that note, there is an extern file generator available here: http://www.dotnetwise.com/Code/

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:42 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > Fantastic! This is huge. I will build something with it as soon as you > check it in. > > Waiting on Alex to take care of some stuff, but anybody that wants to try it, jquery and svg are in this SWC. http://www.teotigraphix.com/asse

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

Yes, you continue to amaze. FWIW, I think Jquery should be in its own swc. What do others think? Svg would go in js.swc since all browser we care about have these APIs, but the JS-framework-specific externs should probably have their own swc. Thoughts? -Alex On 6/18/15, 12:42 PM, "OmPrakash M

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

I agree, but I am just throwing crap at the wall right now. :) Mike On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Yes, you continue to amaze. FWIW, I think Jquery should be in its own > swc. What do others think? Svg would go in js.swc since all browser we > care about have these APIs

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

Om, I am looking at d3, looks pretty impressive, what modules would you be using. They have good API and I could create a base externs file pretty quick. Mike On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > I agree, but I am just throwing crap at the wall right now. :) > > Mike > > O

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

I don't remember using different modules in D3.js, they are all part of the same module I guess? Unless you mean Behaviors, Core, etc. from here: https://github.com/mbostock/d3/wiki/API-Reference Thanks, Om On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > Om, I am looking at d3, look

Re: [FlexJS] JS.swc does not seem to have any SVG* element defintions

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > @Om code completion stopping has to be a FB things, really nothing to do > with the SWC am pretty sure. > Just figured out why code completion stopped working. I saw that jsc.bat was using the JS.swc from the "%FLEX_HOME%\js\libs\temp\e

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

So Alex, you have any idea how to handle the external jQuery? You want me just to write another unit test that builds it for now like I am doing with JS.swc? Also, the build I will commit my stuff when you are done with your build commits. Mike On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 4:27 PM, OmPrakash Muppiral

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

I was just looking at EXTERNC.java to try to figure out if that is supposed to be used to create these SWCs. I would rather build the SWCs in the main build instead of via unit tests so other folks can get a cleaner idea of how to create other SWCs. Is EXTERNC the correct client for this? -Alex

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

Well, it was a stub really and it compiles the js and generates the as. But yeah, I can't see why COMPC can't be called right after that just like in the tests. It's complicated though, dependencies of the js and compiler. SO "right now" I probably need to really test how additional libraries are

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

OK, I’m going to try to use EXTERNC from Ant to build JS.swc. -Alex On 6/18/15, 1:55 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: >Well, it was a stub really and it compiles the js and generates the as. >But >yeah, I can't see why COMPC can't be called right after that just like in >the tests. > >It's complic

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

HI, > Well, so much for the less-RC process. I’ll roll out another RC in about > 9 hours. You might want to allow more time for any other feedback and hopefully reduce the need for further RCs. BTW the binary in the source was found via rat perhaps the release process needs to be updated? Whi

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

On 6/18/15, 2:12 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >HI, > >> Well, so much for the less-RC process. I’ll roll out another RC in >>about >> 9 hours. > >You might want to allow more time for any other feedback and hopefully >reduce the need for further RCs. How much longer should we wait? Anybody els

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

Hi, > How much longer should we wait? Anybody else planning to test RC1? I would assume other people are.. I’ve still not reviewed the release in detail or even got to running the installer yet. It’s been under 24 hours so there may even be people who don’t even know we have a release to vote

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 4:27 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > I don't remember using different modules in D3.js, they are all part of the > same module I guess? Unless you mean Behaviors, Core, etc. from here: > https://github.com/mbostock/d3/wiki/API-Reference > Well I looked at this, I really

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 4:27 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala > > wrote: > > > I don't remember using different modules in D3.js, they are all part of > the > > same module I guess? Unless you mean Behaviors, Core, etc. from here: > > https://gi

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

Yeah, I am probably going to leave this stuff to to other people if they so choose. :) I could eventually parse that one to get something going though. Mike BTW the jQuery will end up in separate SWC sooner than later. On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 6:49 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > On Thu, Jun 1

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

On 6/18/15, 2:31 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> How much longer should we wait? Anybody else planning to test RC1? > >I would assume other people are.. I’ve still not reviewed the release in >detail or even got to running the installer yet. It’s been under 24 hours >so there may even be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

Hi, -1 binding due to binary files in source release (ant_on_air/tests/OSMF2_0.swc) and unable to compile from source. For the source release (.tar.gz) I checked: - signatures and hashes correct - LICENSE and NOTICE are good - README and RELEAE_NOTES are OK, release notes missing a few JIRAs (fi

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

Mike, It looks like EXTERNC needs to handle command-line arguments, correct? I will try to get that working. I am planning on using the same Configurator that MXMLJSC and COMPJSC use unless you can think of a reason not to. -Alex On 6/18/15, 3:57 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: >Yeah, I am pro

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

Hi, > I’ll probably still cut an RC2 tonight because I had to make enough > changes to where some files live and the build script that packages them > that people might be wasting time reviewing the RC1 packages. That may be some other issues that need looking into before making a RC2 (see my vo

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

On 6/18/15, 4:48 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> I’ll probably still cut an RC2 tonight because I had to make enough >> changes to where some files live and the build script that packages them >> that people might be wasting time reviewing the RC1 packages. > >That may be some other issues

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

HI, > Which AIR/FP versions are offered is independent of the release. That is > managed in a data file on flex.a.o. Understand but users would expect a new release to support the recently releases FP 18/AIR 18 would they not? > What did you mean in your other post about signing the app? It i

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

HI, Heres the info from infra: https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/code_signing_service_now_available Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

On 6/18/15, 5:21 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >HI, > >> Which AIR/FP versions are offered is independent of the release. That >>is >> managed in a data file on flex.a.o. > >Understand but users would expect a new release to support the recently >releases FP 18/AIR 18 would they not? Yes, becaus

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

Hi, > Yes, because someone asked about it a while ago separate from this > release. Please don’t mix work that folks besides the RM can do with what > needs to be done to finish the release. Yep it’s not a release blocker and it is separate from the release. Last time Om, Greg and myself all tr

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

On 6/18/15, 6:41 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > >> If someone wants to take on signing the binary, that’s fine with me. > >If you want to make the next RC and then give me the binaries before >putting them up I’ll give it a go, unless someone else wants to? I am >getting on a plane in 24 hours an

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

Build was broken and a rogue binary got in the package. Trying again. -Alex On 6/17/15, 10:47 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Hi, > >Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.2 to be >released. > >The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here: >https://dist.apache.o

Re: [1/2] git commit: [flex-utilities] [refs/heads/develop] - Changed year to be range as per http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#simple

IMO, I don’t think you are supposed to use square brackets around the years. I think that’s just their symbol for replaceable text. On 6/18/15, 2:20 AM, "jmcl...@apache.org" wrote: >Repository: flex-utilities >Updated Branches: > refs/heads/develop ce6849c3c -> 0d7044548 > > >Changed year to b

[VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2

Hi, Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.2 to be released. The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/ The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms, are available h

[DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2

This is the discussion thread. Changes in this RC include: -moved a bunch of files out of the installer folder up to the top-level so that the file structure of the source package better matches the repo. This reduces the chances that the repo build will work but the source package build will not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2

And this time I made sure I ran the ApprovalScript before hitting send. +1 Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-flex-s dk-installer-3.2.0-src.tar.gz Java 1.7 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELE

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2

Hi, With the previous both FlexJS and 4.14.1 SDK failed to install for me, has that been fixed or is it the same with this RC / just my problem? Thanks, Justin