Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.5.0 RC1

2015-11-07 Thread Alex Harui
On 11/6/15, 11:35 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi > >> It would be great if folks who are good at catching these things could >> take a look at the nightly build and/or the commit emails. > >Mind posting a link to the binary? The artifacts are in this folder:

Re: [FLEXJS] TextLayout (was Re: Debugging (was [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0))

2015-11-07 Thread Harbs
On Nov 6, 2015, at 8:55 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > That was an awesome list! Thanks. Just curious, can text layout end up > affecting more than two lines back? Yes. Assuming we’re dealing with paragraph composition, text anywhere in the paragraph can effect the entire line

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0

2015-11-07 Thread Harbs
I just tried running the approval script and it failed: /Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/ApproveFlexJS/ApproveFlexJS.xml:236: The following error occurred while executing this line: /Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/ApproveFlexJS/ApproveFlexJS.xml:240: Execute failed: java.io.IOException:

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.5.0 RC1

2015-11-07 Thread Alex Harui
On 11/7/15, 12:18 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> I believe I have successfully removed the Flex SDK jars from the >>FalconJX >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.5.0 RC1

2015-11-07 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > I believe I have successfully removed the Flex SDK jars from the FalconJX > package without breaking anything. This should eliminate the unintended > packaging of the Adobe jars and also not require any new changes to

Re: [FLEXJS] TextLayout (was Re: Debugging (was [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0))

2015-11-07 Thread Harbs
BTW, another data point is that FOP implemented the KP algorithm. I don’t know how practical it would be to adapt that code, but it’s an Apache project, so licensing should be a non-issue. On Nov 7, 2015, at 10:00 PM, Harbs wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2015, at 8:55 PM, Alex

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0

2015-11-07 Thread Alex Harui
The script is looking for gnu privacy app to verify the signature. Please install it. Sent from my LG G3, an AT 4G LTE smartphone -- Original message-- From: Harbs Date: Sat, Nov 7, 2015 12:48 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org; Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0 I just

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.5.0 RC1

2015-11-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I’m still seeing similar issues with the LICENSE/NOTICE files in the Falcon JX nightly. The binary included these jars: ./compiler/generated/dist/sdk/ant/lib/falcon-flexTasks.jar ./compiler/generated/dist/sdk/lib/compc.jar ./compiler/generated/dist/sdk/lib/compiler.jar

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.5.0 RC1

2015-11-07 Thread Alex Harui
On 11/7/15, 3:28 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >I’m still seeing similar issues with the LICENSE/NOTICE files in the >Falcon JX nightly. > >The binary included these jars: >./compiler/generated/dist/sdk/ant/lib/falcon-flexTasks.jar

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.5.0 RC1

2015-11-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > These are all licensed to the ASF by Adobe. And so ASF policy still needs to be followed, for instance if the bundled software has a NOTICE file you need to look at the contents of that and possibly include it the NOTICE file. > I thought about mentioning them in LICENSE in order to