Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2016-02-15 Thread Harbs
I would definitely work on this if I knew how. My level of expertise using ant is about good enough to look at a build file and get a general idea of how it works. The Flex builds seem really complex to me and I’m not even sure what all the dependencies are. On Feb 16, 2016, at 12:38 AM, Alex

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2016-02-15 Thread Alex Harui
On 2/15/16, 1:54 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: >On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> >> >> On 2/15/16, 1:32 PM, "Michael Schmalle" >>wrote: >> >> >Alex, if I had time I wouldn't do it. :) I hate build stuff and this is >> >exactly why I set that template file up. >> >> Well

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2016-02-15 Thread jude
some ideas: the first time I used ant I loved it but as soon as i asked it to do anything complex it became a major pain, imo. when I was helping harbs with TLF it took me a week and a lot of patience to get it setup. I understand why there are build engineers now. I'm really hesitant to try and

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2016-02-15 Thread Alex Harui
I have not seen anyone offer to make a fix. I am mostly done with a change. Hopefully it will go in tonight. Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -- Original message-- From: OmPrakash Muppirala Date: Mon, Feb 15, 2016 1:55 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org; Subject:Re: [FALCONJX

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2016-02-15 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Alex, The way I am reading this thread, I don't think folks are asking you to make the changes. They are generally asking if it is okay to make these kind of changes. It would be good if you are okay with the changes since you are one of the affected parties. Thanks, Om On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2016-02-15 Thread Michael Schmalle
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 2/15/16, 1:32 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: > > >Alex, if I had time I wouldn't do it. :) I hate build stuff and this is > >exactly why I set that template file up. > > Well, I'm glad it worked for you, and it worked for me, but now I a

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2016-02-15 Thread Alex Harui
On 2/15/16, 1:32 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: >Alex, if I had time I wouldn't do it. :) I hate build stuff and this is >exactly why I set that template file up. Well, I'm glad it worked for you, and it worked for me, but now I am spending time trying to implement something else to make others

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2016-02-15 Thread Michael Schmalle
Alex, if I had time I wouldn't do it. :) I hate build stuff and this is exactly why I set that template file up. I have never had a problem getting things going, so people that are having problems are missing a step or two. It seems like a youtube video showing exactly the steps would help hehehe

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2016-02-15 Thread Alex Harui
And there is a template-unittest.properties file in compiler.tests which explains the options. The README supposedly contains sufficient information to build from sources since several PMC members have successfully done so and voted to release. I don't know how much time to devote to make the bui

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2016-02-15 Thread Michael Schmalle
This all came back to the beginning. The tests(Falcon, etal) were a nightmare, I'm talking 2012. When I started writing the FalconJX compiler and created falcon.jx and falcon.jx.tests Eclipse projects, I needed something that worked, so I created the template file so it would work in the two proje

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2016-02-15 Thread Josh Tynjala
I think I found that you need to add unittest.properties in both compiler and compiler.jx. The readme file has details about what properties should be defined. It's near the bottom, as I recall, which means it's easy to miss. I agree with Harbs that we should probably make this simpler. Instead of

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2016-02-15 Thread Harbs
I would vote to have a single file which contains settings for all environment variables for all projects. Can we adjust ALL the builds in all projects to look in ../properties/env.properties for environment variables? (i.e. in a folder on the same level as the repo) It would require manually

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2016-02-15 Thread Harbs
Yes I did have an env.properties file. But the paths seem to be right, and removing it did not make a difference. It’s good to know it’s not needed though… On Feb 15, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > This implies you still have environment variables set somehow. The > defaults would use

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2016-02-15 Thread Harbs
Where do I need to set the unittest.properties file? I’m happy to do so, but I think it would be great if we could at least get some instructions on everything needed to build from source. Every time I come back to this, I have trouble. Maybe it’s just me, but it seems like it raises the bar ne

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2016-02-15 Thread Alex Harui
On 2/14/16, 11:52 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >Cleaning the repo seemed to have helped somewhat, but I still could not >compile, and I’m assuming because I need to build falcon: >Buildfile: >/Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/flex-asjs/frameworks/projects/XML/build. >xml > >clean: > >check-falcon-home:

AW: FlexJS Logo?

2016-02-15 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi Josh, great stuff ... it's getting better and better ... even if I can't really say, which color I like most, but definitely one of the colors. Probably the red or orange one stands out the most, but the green one is really friendly ;-) Chris Von: D

Re: FlexJS Logo?

2016-02-15 Thread Deepak MS
Tried to pick up 'J' from existing 'F' to maintain the text design flow. Some of the variations: http://snag.gy/544ut.jpg On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Josh Tynjala wrote: > I agree with Alex that everything on the same baseline looks better. The > subscript adds negative space in the middl