AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

Found out what was wrong ... you have to specify the path to the FLEX_SDK sources and not a FLEX_SDK installation. I set it to my latest FDK directory and this doesn't contain any sources it could copy. This should be checked in the build. There's just too much you can do wrong and have to find

Re: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

Swfutils is a subset of the swfutils files in the flex-sdk repo. The ant task copies files. It would probably be ok to just have flex-falcon have a copy of the subset in its repo. These files hardly ever change. -Alex On 3/11/16, 2:28 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:

AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

Ok ... so it turned out that the "swfutil.jar" in compiler/generated/dist/sdk/lib was sort of empty. It didn't contain any classes, but only META-INF ... having a look at the "swfutils" directory, this is almost empty. At least it doesn't contain a single class. Chris

AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

Hmmm ... ok ... now falcon and falcon.jx seem to have run, but now I'm getting compile errors in the flex-compiler-oem module: compile: [javac] Compiling 97 source files to /Users/christoferdutz/Temp/flex-falcon/flex-compiler-oem/bin [javac] warning: [options] bootstrap class path not

Re: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

On 3/11/16, 9:40 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Well I think that's the problem ... I can't see a GCL.swc ... I also >noticed, that an "ant" run only seems to compile compiler and run >compiler.tests ... it doesn't seem to run the falcon.jx stuff. I think it >would be

Re: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

"ant all" should build everything. - Josh On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Well I think that's the problem ... I can't see a GCL.swc ... I also > noticed, that an "ant" run only seems to compile compiler and run > compiler.tests ... it

AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

Well I think that's the problem ... I can't see a GCL.swc ... I also noticed, that an "ant" run only seems to compile compiler and run compiler.tests ... it doesn't seem to run the falcon.jx stuff. I think it would be good if it would actually run "all". what would be the right sequence of

Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

On 3/11/16, 9:34 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >On Mar 11, 2016 8:49 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote >> >> I'm wondering if we need to have a release branch. I don't think there >>is >> anything

Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

On Mar 11, 2016 8:49 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > On 3/10/16, 11:49 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >Is there a dummy/test release to look at so the LICENSE/NOTICE, release > >notes etc etc can be checked? > > There are the nightly builds.

Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

On 3/10/16, 11:49 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Is there a dummy/test release to look at so the LICENSE/NOTICE, release >notes etc etc can be checked? There are the nightly builds. I haven't worked on RELEASE_NOTES or double-checked LICENSE and NOTICE yet, but

Re: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

On 3/11/16, 6:03 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >I'm currently getting test failures in flacon.jx (TestFlexJSClass). I >first thought this was due to me building with maven, but now I am >getting the same errors with Ant so I guess they are generally >problematic. >

AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

I'm currently getting test failures in flacon.jx (TestFlexJSClass). I first thought this was due to me building with maven, but now I am getting the same errors with Ant so I guess they are generally problematic. Here an example ... they are all quite similar: java.lang.AssertionError: