Thanks.
I’ll give it a spin tomorrow.
Harbs
> On Apr 24, 2017, at 1:47 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> OK, I pushed a fix for this.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/21/17, 2:04 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> Another dependency problem:
>>
>> org.apache.flex.svg.GraphicContainer contains an internal class called
>>
OK, I pushed a fix for this.
-Alex
On 4/21/17, 2:04 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Another dependency problem:
>
>org.apache.flex.svg.GraphicContainer contains an internal class called
>GraphicGroup which extends ContainerBase
>
>GraphicContainer has the following requires:
>
>goog.provide('org.apache.fle
Hi,
> The patch file issue was resolved. The externs are not derivative works.
How was it resolved? From what I can see there’s wasn't confirmation on legal
discuss.
> The MIT license changes you want to make are not "must do". Just
> something you want to do. Now would be a good time to do
Do any other PMC members have concerns about the MD5 code? I don't. I
think we're good to go.
-Alex
On 4/23/17, 8:33 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>Justin, you are welcome to contact the original authors and find out more.
>But please don't expect the release
On 4/23/17, 2:18 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Can you be more specific about the outstanding issues.
>
>Yep see [1] and this thread [2]. It's generally expected that any
>outstanding issues form a previous vote are fixed in the next release.
The patch file issue was resolved. The exte
I would imagine a DataTable would be what you are suggesting.
Peter
> On Apr 22, 2017, at 6:09 AM, piotrz wrote:
>
> Hi Carlos!
>
> +1 for this :)
>
> Piotr
>
>
>
> -
> Apache Flex PMC
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> --
> View this message in context:
> https://na01.safelinks.protect
Hi Peter,
Nice job! I think it is really worth put this link with some infor on
twitter and facebook. It's really useful and I bet that people will ask.
Thank you,
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.
Justin, you are welcome to contact the original authors and find out more.
But please don't expect the release process to wait till we figure this
out.
We can fix license headers in a subsequent release if needed.
I would rather Alex and Harbs continue their coding, prepping for release,
etc inst
My point is that it does not matter which came from where.
Even if you are right (which I doubt — Mike Chambers probably just took most of
the code from existing code bases) the code was owned by Adobe (since it was
written by an Adobe employee whether Mike Chambers or someone else) and Adobe
d
Hi,
> You have no way of determining that the original came from as3corelib and not
> the other way around.
Yes we do we can ask the people involved. Also look at the github dates, for
instance the license was updated in 2008. [1]
Alex has requested the same on other licensing issues so why sh
Hi,
I've added a new page to the FlexJS Wiki[1] and updated a few other pages to
reflect the changes I've made over the last couple of weeks.
—peter
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/FlexJS+Container+Classes+and+Layouts
You have no way of determining that the original came from as3corelib and not
the other way around. Mike Chambers was an Adobe employee and the code he wrote
belongs to Adobe. Adobe can license it however they want. In fact they donated
it to Apache, so there are no issues.
Thanks,
Harbs
> On
Hi Chris,
I definitely moved forward with build of my project, but I have one weird
exception [1] which I really do not know what's mean.
It occurs when I'm adding following option to my pom:
${basedir}/target/javascript/bin/js-debug/mdl-js-index-template.html
Everything is building fine withou
Hi,
> As I already responded, IMO there are none.
The code original comes from a 3rd party and is BSD licensed [1]
So why:
1. Does our file have an Apache header? [2]
2. Is the BSD license in question is missing from the LICENSE file? [3]
It seems to me quite likely that Adobe may of changed th
Hi,
> Can you be more specific about the outstanding issues.
Yep see [1] and this thread [2]. It's generally expected that any outstanding
issues form a previous vote are fixed in the next release.
I think the JSON license issue has been resolved and I respond to Harbs about
the other issue.
15 matches
Mail list logo