Re: [FlexJS] internal classes

2017-04-23 Thread Harbs
Thanks. I’ll give it a spin tomorrow. Harbs > On Apr 24, 2017, at 1:47 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > OK, I pushed a fix for this. > > -Alex > > On 4/21/17, 2:04 PM, "Harbs" wrote: > >> Another dependency problem: >> >> org.apache.flex.svg.GraphicContainer contains an internal class called >>

Re: [FlexJS] internal classes

2017-04-23 Thread Alex Harui
OK, I pushed a fix for this. -Alex On 4/21/17, 2:04 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >Another dependency problem: > >org.apache.flex.svg.GraphicContainer contains an internal class called >GraphicGroup which extends ContainerBase > >GraphicContainer has the following requires: > >goog.provide('org.apache.fle

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-04-23 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The patch file issue was resolved. The externs are not derivative works. How was it resolved? From what I can see there’s wasn't confirmation on legal discuss. > The MIT license changes you want to make are not "must do". Just > something you want to do. Now would be a good time to do

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-04-23 Thread Alex Harui
Do any other PMC members have concerns about the MD5 code? I don't. I think we're good to go. -Alex On 4/23/17, 8:33 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >Justin, you are welcome to contact the original authors and find out more. >But please don't expect the release

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-04-23 Thread Alex Harui
On 4/23/17, 2:18 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Can you be more specific about the outstanding issues. > >Yep see [1] and this thread [2]. It's generally expected that any >outstanding issues form a previous vote are fixed in the next release. The patch file issue was resolved. The exte

Re: [FlexJS] Table

2017-04-23 Thread Peter Ent
I would imagine a DataTable would be what you are suggesting. Peter > On Apr 22, 2017, at 6:09 AM, piotrz wrote: > > Hi Carlos! > > +1 for this :) > > Piotr > > > > - > Apache Flex PMC > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > -- > View this message in context: > https://na01.safelinks.protect

Re: [FlexJS] FlexJS Wiki Update

2017-04-23 Thread piotrz
Hi Peter, Nice job! I think it is really worth put this link with some infor on twitter and facebook. It's really useful and I bet that people will ask. Thank you, Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-04-23 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Justin, you are welcome to contact the original authors and find out more. But please don't expect the release process to wait till we figure this out. We can fix license headers in a subsequent release if needed. I would rather Alex and Harbs continue their coding, prepping for release, etc inst

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-04-23 Thread Harbs
My point is that it does not matter which came from where. Even if you are right (which I doubt — Mike Chambers probably just took most of the code from existing code bases) the code was owned by Adobe (since it was written by an Adobe employee whether Mike Chambers or someone else) and Adobe d

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-04-23 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > You have no way of determining that the original came from as3corelib and not > the other way around. Yes we do we can ask the people involved. Also look at the github dates, for instance the license was updated in 2008. [1] Alex has requested the same on other licensing issues so why sh

[FlexJS] FlexJS Wiki Update

2017-04-23 Thread Peter Ent
Hi, I've added a new page to the FlexJS Wiki[1] and updated a few other pages to reflect the changes I've made over the last couple of weeks. —peter [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/FlexJS+Container+Classes+and+Layouts

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-04-23 Thread Harbs
You have no way of determining that the original came from as3corelib and not the other way around. Mike Chambers was an Adobe employee and the code he wrote belongs to Adobe. Adobe can license it however they want. In fact they donated it to Apache, so there are no issues. Thanks, Harbs > On

Re: [FlexJS, Maven] Build library project type to js only swc

2017-04-23 Thread piotrz
Hi Chris, I definitely moved forward with build of my project, but I have one weird exception [1] which I really do not know what's mean. It occurs when I'm adding following option to my pom: ${basedir}/target/javascript/bin/js-debug/mdl-js-index-template.html Everything is building fine withou

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-04-23 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > As I already responded, IMO there are none. The code original comes from a 3rd party and is BSD licensed [1] So why: 1. Does our file have an Apache header? [2] 2. Is the BSD license in question is missing from the LICENSE file? [3] It seems to me quite likely that Adobe may of changed th

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-04-23 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Can you be more specific about the outstanding issues. Yep see [1] and this thread [2]. It's generally expected that any outstanding issues form a previous vote are fixed in the next release. I think the JSON license issue has been resolved and I respond to Harbs about the other issue.