Moonshine 1.5.1 Released

2017-07-31 Thread sankar
We are pleased to announce that Moonshine 1.5.1 has been released. Updates: - Better simulator size for mobile application - Lots of fixes to Ant build procedures Let us know if you encounter any issues with the update. http://moonshine-ide.com -- View this message in context:

Re: [MAVEN-BUILD] FlexJS Framework (maven) - Build # 1129 - Still Failing

2017-07-31 Thread Alex Harui
Does it build locally for you? I can't get TLF to build with Maven, and it isn't clear that it should. -Alex On 7/31/17, 2:42 AM, "piotrz" wrote: >I have no idea what is happen. I just changed machine which building >FlexJS >and it is still not working. I do not

Re: Debugger statement

2017-07-31 Thread Alex Harui
I'm still trying to get the ok to use undocumented APIs without violating the Flash EULA which prohibits reverse-engineering. Could just make it JS-only for now. -Alex On 7/31/17, 3:01 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: >If there are no objections in the next 24 hours, I plan to

Re: Debugger statement

2017-07-31 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
+1 I so used to doing this nowadays. Also, this is very useful when we want to debug Node.js applications. There is no good way to setup debug points the first time with Node.js applications. Thanks, Om On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote: > If there

Re: Debugger statement

2017-07-31 Thread piotrz
Hi Josh, +1. Unfortunately didn't have time to try this one, but it seems to be very useful and I will definitely make an first attempt of use when I get my hands back onto framework code. :) Thank you for this feature! Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this

Debugger statement

2017-07-31 Thread Josh Tynjala
If there are no objections in the next 24 hours, I plan to merge my "feature/debugger-statement" branch that adds a "debugger" statement to ActionScript similar to the one available in JS. Use of the debugger statement is completely optional, but it's a useful way to trigger the debugger from

RE: XML hasOwnProperty method

2017-07-31 Thread Jim Norris
Hi- I installed the Apache FlexJS Nightly using the SDK Installer and adjusted the project compiler to the new SDK, but I am still seeing failures with the handleOwnProperty method. I will try to do some additional debugging tomorrow to see where the problem is coming from. In the meantime I

Re: FlexJS PAYG and layouts

2017-07-31 Thread Harbs
I did think of the variable issues. Using instance variables does not generally strike me as problematic. (unless there’s a lot of them) I did find some interesting articles on inlining vs function calling. Here’s one.[1] Too many super calls might be bad because “call” can be expensive. Yes.

Re: FlexJS PAYG and layouts

2017-07-31 Thread Alex Harui
You're welcome to try different approaches to sharing code in the base classes. Often, though, loops over children need to be inlined not only for performance reasons (to cut out one function call in the inner loop), but also for information sharing reasons (local variables accumulating values

FlexJS PAYG and layouts

2017-07-31 Thread Harbs
Here’s a dilema I ran into this morning: The OneFlexibleLayout beads have some code which look like this: if (!contentView.element.style["align-items"]) contentView.element.style["align-items"] = "center”; What that does, is check if “align-items” is already set and sets it to center if

Re: [MAVEN-BUILD] FlexJS Framework (maven) - Build # 1129 - Still Failing

2017-07-31 Thread piotrz
Harbs, I just tried develop pipeline and it's working, so it probably something on this machine. [1] [1] https://builds.apache.org/view/E-G/view/Flex/job/FlexJS%20Pipeline/job/develop/ Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context:

Re: [07/13] git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/release0.8.0] - give up on trying to use FlexBox for full-screen 3-pane views. FlexBox seems more happy stretching to content size instead of clipping a

2017-07-31 Thread Harbs
The only example I found was the ASDoc app. I switched it and it appears to work. (I pushed my changes.) > On Jul 31, 2017, at 7:35 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > It will either work in the examples that use it or it won't. Try it and > find out. > > -Alex > > On