Re: Flash Player end of life

Hi, > I would already be interested in how Adobe can make the flash player no > longer play SWF. I believe recent versions of the flash player have this feature built into them. I was pointed to this thread [1] which include info about how to change mmc.cfg to disable uninstalling and updating

Flash Player end of life

Hi, I notice on [1] it states this: In December, Chrome 55 will make HTML5 the default experience, except for sites which only support Flash Which I assume means a URL ending .swf? And on [2] it states: Since Adobe is no longer supporting Flash Player after the EOL Date, Adobe will block Flash

Re: [Vote] Release flex-dk-converter-maven-extension

Hi, +1 (binding) Generally to want to cancel the editing vote and create a new thread when voting on a new RC, otherwise is may not be clear what people are voting on. I checked RC2: - Signatures and hashes fine - LICENSE and NOTICE fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF

Re: [Vote] Release flex-dk-converter-maven-extension

Hi, > Since this is not a flex-sdk release, we just want to release that piece of > code. In that case you need something to check (a release candidate) for people to vote on, otherwise it’s not a release. Thanks, Justin

Re: [Vote] Release flex-dk-converter-maven-extension

HI, Where’s the release candidate to vote on? Thanks, Justin

Re: [Vote] Moving JIRA issues and Confluence Wiki to GitHub

Hi, +0 I see little reason to change and split where you need to look at things in two places. I assume that JIRA and Confluence will not be made read only? Thanks, Justin

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

Hi, > I think it would be easier and more transparent for folks to handle future > development (if it will happen) by using GitHub. i’m that sure that it is. JIRA has a number of significant benefits over GitHub issues including better searching and querying. (Yes I use both). Do we know if it

Re: [2/2] git commit: [flex-utilities] [refs/heads/develop] - switch to AIR 30 so we can use TLSSocket against TLS1.2. Replace the as3crypto TLSSocket with our own that uses AIR 30 SecureSocket

Hi, I don’t believe this is the correct way to handle this ie by replacing the 3rd party headers with ASF even though changes have been made. Can you point me to the original code? Changes to 3rd party files are generally made under the original license and changes need to be major before addi

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

> On 6/11/18, 12:58 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I moved file on our website [1] and it's working. If > I > > change it > >

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

; > -Alex > > On 6/10/18, 10:27 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > Hi, > > > I'm talking about that file [1]. What kind of security issues do you > > exactly see if I move that file on my server ? > > Well if someone changed the path

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

Hi, > I'm talking about that file [1]. What kind of security issues do you > exactly see if I move that file on my server ? Well if someone changed the paths in those files, our users could unwitting be made to download walware or other stuff. Risk is probably low but I have no details on the s

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

Hi, Which file are the going to host (it's a little unclear from you email). There are some security concerns here I think. Justin On Sat., 9 Jun. 2018, 4:00 pm Piotr Zarzycki, wrote: > I did tests with moved file to my server and everything went fine. I just > have enough to fighting with ch

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

Hi, > I just debug it and it looks like there is some problem with parsing > in MirrorURLUtil - fetchMirrorFromCGIResult. We go following web page [1]. > What actually should be parsed out of it ? Yes you’re seeing what I saw, that’s the full HTML rather than XML result returned. I’m guessing It

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

Hi, > The worst thing that I have seen the same as Alex - that there is a problem > with https, not parsing itself. If it is an https issue like this (one of the possible mirrors that can be returned) https://apache.melbourneitmirror.net/flex/4.16.1/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

Hi, > I think you've proposed multiple causes. One is that the cgi isn't returning > the right thing, the other was that fetching apache-flex-installer-config.xml > over https was failing. > Which one or both are you claiming to be the issue? Well you were saying that https was the issue and

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

Hi, > That doesn't sound like what I saw when I debugged into it last week, but if > you are right, then it sounds like you can prepare a fix for it. I’ve run into through a reverse proxy to record the installers traffic and also though the debugger and both match. Perhaps there was also a diff

Re: Installer Issue: Host binaries elsewhere?

Hi, As mentioned in the other thread is issue is not SSL released but is released to our mirror CGI script. http://flex.apache.org/single-mirror-url--xml.cgi looks to be returning too much information and the installer’s code (in MirrorURLUtil

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

Hi, > 1. The page structure has changed and it failing to correctly parse the > mirror URL out of the page so the URL it manufactures times out And Ive confirmed (in the debugger) that exactly what is happening. This code below in MirrorURLUtil.as is no longer parsing the correct mirror name ou

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

Hi, > It’s the https call to the mirror to get the XML installer config file that > is failing. And it could be failing for one of two reasons, Which I don't think has been 100% determined, 1. The page structure has changed and it failing to correctly parse the mirror URL out of the page so

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

Hi, > There are two different issues that have been brought up. The installer > program is required to use a mirror to download the latest release (4.16.1) > per Apache policy. The installer is failing to fetch the mirror information > over HTTPS. We have asked for help from the original dev

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

Hi, > There are two different issues that have been brought up. The installer > program is required to use a mirror to download the latest release (4.16.1) > per Apache policy. The installer is failing to fetch the mirror information > over HTTPS. We have asked for help from the original dev

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

HI, > Have tried it but still the same timeout issue, I am using the same version > of installer (3.3.1 Mac) to install, do I need to use the older versions of > installer instead? The old XML config file is probably cached and you’re probably not seeing the new version. Thanks, Justin

Re: Installer Issue: Host binaries elsewhere?

Hi, > Looks like all download are failing either with a timeout or other error. It > doesn’t seem to be OS specific but it’s looks to be SDK version specific. I just tried it and I’m also getting a timeout. Given non 4.16 versions can be downloaded it looks to me tp be an issue with the configu

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

Hi, > As what Justin has explained, it is due to the redirection from http to > https issue, this mean even if I use the order version of the installer > will still having the same problem. Look like Alex has updated that UTL to use https, you might want to try again. Thanks, Justin

Re: Installer Issue: Host binaries elsewhere?

Hi, > As you hopefully know, lots of people are having trouble with the installer. > Can someone look to see if we've had any successful 4.16.1 installs in the > past week or two? Looks like all download are failing either with a timeout or other error. It doesn’t seem to be OS specific but i

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

Hi, > get-with-no-params: > [get] Getting: > http://airdownload.adobe.com/air/mac/download/29.0//AdobeAIRSDK.dmg?ts=201805311405 > [get] To: > /Users/oharkins/Documents/Adobe/ApachieFlex/test/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin/in/AdobeAIRSDK.dmg > [get] > http://airdownload.adobe.com/air/ma

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC3*

Hi, > FYI, Yesterday (Sunday my time) I have moved binaries to different folder > - because there were in a wrong one in comparing to the previous release. > It ends up that I need to wait for the mirrors. I thought that after 24 > hours they will be available but they are not. You can check the

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

Hi, > FWIW, I confirmed with the author that this code is Adobe-owned. Consider it > "donated". Thanks for confirming that. I’ve put back the headers and fixed up the LICENSE file to match the new information. Thanks, Justin

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

Hi, > IMO, we'd be better off having these files donated to Apache so the header > does not need to change. There is no need to keep it as third-party since > the original author hasn't touched it in years. I'm pretty sure it is ok > for me to just say it is owned by Adobe and thus donated. We

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

Hi, You don’t need to assert copyright it exists the moment something is created. In this case copyright is with someone (the author or perhaps Adobe) not us but that’s OK as it Apache licensed. If a file is developed at the ASF it has the standard ASF header [1] but if it’s a 3rd party work i

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

Hi, So Alex as an Adobe employee you're happy that someone took Adobe licensed code (assuming that is the case) that wasn’t part of a grant to the ASF and added it to the code base with ASF headers? What do you think Adobe legal might say about this? No need to ask them I just asking you think

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

Hi, See here for where it originally come from. [1] Thanks, Justin 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f3fee0e5b9b8853f744a8a111a4e7e5d3d9a4960f570b02f6409bc06@1343037815@%3Cdev.flex.apache.org%3E

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

Hi, > I think the author is an Adobe employee. It isn't clear he would own > copyright. I know I wouldn't if I had written it. AFAIK This code wasn’t part of Adobe’s donation to Apache but added later as it was Apache licensed. Thanks, Justin

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

Hi, > If you can fix it that would be great. I’ve fixed the header. There is still an outstanding question re how to fix the license issue. It easy to fix either way just we need to agree on which way to do it. You could make another RC without that license fix but I think it would be better t

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

Hi, Found a couple of other (very) minor issues (which are certainly not blockers): - This file had an incorrect ASF header [1] No objections if I fix it? - build.number also has 2 copyright statement in it with different dates. That probably should be fixed. - This file [2] has copyright 2014 an

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

Hi, > I’ve also tried the installer a couple of time and getting errors. And on the 3rd try it worked - but still not sure why the first two runs failed. Thanks, Justin

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

Hi, I’ve also tried the installer a couple of time and getting errors. Running on OSX Sierra (and latest version of Air) I get the following: Installer version 3.3.1 (mac) Using Locale: en_AU Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI. SDK version Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 AIR version 29.0 Fl

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2

Hi, +0 because of license issues (see discussion) I checked: - signatures and hashes correct - NOTICE has incorrect year - LICENSE has an issue re the NativeApplicationUpdater - no unexpected binary files - one file is missing an ASF header [1] Also note that this file isn’t under version contro

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

Hi, The NOTICE had the wrong year in it so I fixed that. We would need to curt another RC if we want correct in the release. The licensing for the NativeApplicationUpdater is a little odd. The LICENSE file states: "The NativeApplicationUpdater is available under Apache License 2.0. For details

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

Hi, > Downloading 2.2.zip from: https://github.com/swfobject/swfobject/archive > [get] [IOErrorEvent type="ioError" bubbles=false cancelable=false > eventPhase=2 text="Error #2032" errorID=2032] It looks like the first https call is failing. Air us to use IE’s proxy settings (not 100% sure

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

Hi, Error #2038 is fairly generic but it could be: - windows firewall is blocking that server/port - AIR apps used use IE proxy setting (not sure if that still is the case). You might what to check your IE proxy settings for SSL and see that they are correct. Thanks, Justin

Re: Change to SHA1 signatures

Hi, > Is this a massive change to our build script ? It’s a minor change and/or can be done manually. Thanks, Justin

Re: ApacheFlexBuild Nightly Build Server

Hi, I changed the jenkins job to only run on windows boxes (of which there are 4) and it is working so that gets rid of those minor issues. Note that you need to specify the windows version of ant and java in the job to get it working. It’s currently not running the checkin tests but that shou

Re: ApacheFlexBuild Nightly Build Server

Hi, One other minor thing is that it’s not running rat but that should be easy to fix. Thanks, Justin

Re: ApacheFlexBuild Nightly Build Server

Hi, > As a temporary measure it should be easy enough to set up a build on > builds.apache.org that makes the release package but doesn’t run the checkin > tests. After a few minor changes to the build scripts to get the release to compile on Linux I have it set up and running here. [1] This p

4.16.1 release merged into master

Hi, Looks like the last release wasn’t merged into master I just went ahead and did that. Thanks, Justin

Re: git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - testing if we can make a release build target without running the tests

Hi, > This is one of the commit which causes build fail. What's the plan to fix > that ? That commit wasn’t the issue it was the one after that. I’ve pushed a fix and things should be back to normal. Thanks, Justin

Re: git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - testing if we can make a release build target without running the tests

Hi, > This is one of the commit which causes build fail. What's the plan to fix > that ? Odd that change is working fine locally and I can’t see how that would break the build i.e. adding new target that isn’t used. I’ll look into it. Thanks, Justin

Re: ApacheFlexBuild Nightly Build Server

Hi, > We could copy the last good build somewhere. Unless changes are actually > committed to the Flex repos, there isn't going to be any difference > between one nightly build and another. As a temporary measure it should be easy enough to set up a build on builds.apache.org that makes the rel

Re: ApacheFlexBuild Nightly Build Server

Hi, > If someone wants to move the jobs to builds.a.o and deal with working with > Infra or joining > Infra and maintaining the builds as Infra requires updating versions of > things, that is a third option. I would be willing to do that. > But if that volunteer disappears, then Flex is back t

Re: ApacheFlexBuild Nightly Build Server

Hi, > Yep we have FlexJS and Royale [1], but this is Maven build and we need to > have also ANT. Jenkins can run ant builds as well. > All PMCs have access to the build server Currently the Flex PMC doesn’t have access to the server AFAIK. Please email the login details to the Flex private lis

Re: ApacheFlexBuild Nightly Build Server

Hi, > There are some choices: > 1) Some other PMC member get an Azure VM and move the jobs there > 2) Run Flex jobs on the new Royale VM. There is a 3rd option and that is to run it on builds.apache.org. We did have this working at one point and I can’t see why it wouldn’t be possible to do so

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

Hi, Some minor suggested changes: > --- start draft announcement - > The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Flex > SDK Installer 3.3.0 > > Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 is an update to Apache Flex SDK Installer > 2.2. 3.2 rather than 2.2 I think?

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Hi, > Btw your example failed for me with error [2], so I moved formatter > to declarations - Didn't you have such error ? No error here. Not checked but I think that only happens if you use a s:Application rather than an mx:Application. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Hi, > Please raise jira issue. Will do. > I'm going to move forward with release, cause it’s existing issue and it's > probably with us for a long time. Does any user > raise that problem ? No user has raised an issue for pound sign not showing that I could find. BTW I’ve used en_GB in the la

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Hi, > I have so far more +1 than -1 so I can release it, but wondering how to fix > it for the next release. For a release you need at least 3 +1 binding votes and more +1’s than -1’s. Currently by my count there’s two +2 and one -1. Piotr you could vote +1 and make this a release. However giv

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Hi, > Please raise jira issue. I'm going to move forward with release, cause it's > existing issue and it's probably with us for a long time. AFAIKS this is not an existing issue but a new issue. Looking at the comparison of 4.16.0 to what's in version control they match. 4.16.1 doesn’t match w

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Hi, > My suggestion is to vote +1 and ship this release since this is not a new > issue. And I'd suggest fixing this before making a release. But if the release gets three +1 votes and more +1’s than -1’s then that’s a release. > I think there are code page issues in the source files. Voluntee

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Hi, > Perhaps the SharedResources.properties has been incorrectly converted to > UTF-8 when it actually should be ISO-8859? (The pound sign is character 163.) > Perhaps we have a mix of text encodings for resource files? Answer yes and it’s a bit of a mess. In version control we have resource

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Hi, > It looks like this was also a problem in 4.16.0. Can you confirm? Doesn’t look like it from a quick look but I’ve not tried to compile against it (yet). 4.16.1 vs VC gives: diff -w -r *src ~/flex-sdk | grep currencySymbol < currencySymbol= > currencySymbol=? 4.16.0 vs VC gives no diffe

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Hi, > diff -w -r > apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties > > /Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties > 39c39 > < currencySymbol=� > --- >> currencySymbol= Just confirmed this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2

Hi, -1 binding because of locale issues. I checked: - hashes and signatures correct - LICENSE and NOTICE good - no unexpected binary files - all source file has ASF header where needed - can compile from source Tried a few simple tests and while most worked but we are still having locale issues

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Hi, Looks like we may still have some unicode issues. Some that are likely to cause issues: Comparing the source release to a clean checked out repo: file apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/licenseParts/saxon9-NOTICES/UNICODE.txt apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/licenseParts/saxon9-NOTICES/UNICODE.txt: ISO

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC3*

HI, > Windows installs were successful with AIR/Flash 24 and later? Yes quite a number have work. For 24, 25 and 26 more worked than got error 1000. > I didn’t think that was possible with the 4.16.0 install script. From google analytics looking at only windows install successes: Apache Flex

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC3*

Hi, > It's occurring 100% on Win 7 or Win 10 from your statistics ? Hard to tell as we don’t directly log that and google analytics is not giving that info up. Given the number of distinct users I would guess it’s a mix but more likely more windows 10 than 7. Thanks, Justin

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC3*

Hi, > Not only with installer 3.3 but also with installer 3.2. It doesn't occur > often. I think on Windows 7 it may work. JFYI It's occurring 100% of the time with 3.3 (from a small sample of 42 anyway), with 3.2 over the last few month I can find 6 of the same errors out of 2000 odd working i

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC3*

Hi, > Tests never too much! :) However I explained it in several places that we > have this issue from your email. [1] Which has been fixed in 4.16.1. This > is the only reason why I'm trying to release new SDK. So just to be clear 4.16.0 will fail to work on windows with the 3.3 installer? Per

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC3*

Hi, JFYI May be another issue with the new installer. I got sent this off line: (paths edited to remove user name) Installer version 3.3.0 (windows) Using Locale: en_US Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI. SDK version Apache Flex SDK 4.16.0 AIR version 27.0 Flash Player version 27.

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC3*

Hi, > Validating download: > d:\Users\kangmin\Desktop\4.16.0_AIR27.0/in/AdobeAIRSDK.zip > <- directory delimiter error? > Error #1000 This is an out of memory error, the new installer which is just about to be released should fix this. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

Hi, > Niclas, Where did I say it was "Binary with link to Source?” I would assume from your email here: > So, my assessment is: > 1) the binary artifacts are ok. No new problems. > 2) the source artifacts are not ok. There might be a workaround if we can > figure out how to convert the code p

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

Hi, > I just pushed RC2 [1]. Can you check whether you have the same problem ? > > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.16.1/rc2/ Yes I can confirm that the scripts have execute bits. The files do not have the correct line endings (for instance look at LICENSE) Re UTF-8 it doe

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

Hi, > The binaries are not created by first creating the source package, > unpacking it and compiling it. You were a Flex SDK RM at least once, did > you not understand what you were signing? Every time I made the release I made it from the source on my local machine on a clean tagged branch. I

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

Hi, I would guess that all the issue are git config issues. git config —list will give you a list of your settings. > I think I just verified that the binary artifacts are ok regarding the > non-ascii characters. I think that's because they are correct in the > repo, and were compiled into bund

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

Hi, CCed to you just in case it doesn’t show up on the list as it tends to reject email with images. What it should look like: What 4.16.1 gives: There are other similar issues cause by the same issue as well. Code to replicate: http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009";

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

Hi, > Is the DateChooser problem from your local build of the sources or from > the RC binary artifacts? A local built from the compiled source bundled I've not tested the binary yet but given it was made from the source release I would expect it to show the same issues. Or are you saying that

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

Hi, > Which would effect the locale files i.e. the Chinese and Japanese and > probably French and other european language locales would be broken. Confirmed it’s an issue and I would also vote -1 binding because of that. To reproduce just view a DateChooser and you’ll see it has some ? in it’s

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

Hi, > What is a problem with the release is that the files do not appear to be > UTF-8 encoded. Which would effect the locale files i.e. the Chinese and Japanese and probably French and other european language locales would be broken. And perhaps some of the keyboard handling code? Thanks,

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

Hi, > Ok I got it, but I don't fully understand how changing line endings for > files check outed for sdk repository could change final .tar.gz file. Exact > this file has wrong line endings, or file after unpack have ? As I said the bash script contained in the .tar.gz have the wrong line ending

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

Hi, > What do I need to do in build.xml script in order to fix that or your > suggestion is to take this file and do something with it ? I’ve not build on windows for several years so not 100% sure sorry. When building on OSX I’ve not run into the issue. It may actually be a git setting issue

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

Hi, > I don't understand actually .tar.gz source is used on Linux and OSX, the .zip on windows. Linux and OSX use different line endings and if you use DOS/windows style line ending in shell scripts they will not run > It was packaged by build.xml script on Windows 10. Does it make the > diff

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1

Hi, Tested on OSX. -1 (binding) as the .tar.gz source release has the wrong line endings. This causes scripts to fail and may cause other issues. But everything else checked out OK. I checked: - signatures and hashes good - LICENSE and NOTICE good - All source file have ASF headers - No unexpe

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

Hi, I’m also having issues downloading OSMF when trying t compile the SDK and I do have the international crypto set up. However it's only failing on on Java 1.7 and works on 1.8, on OSX if that helps anyone. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

Hi, Looks like the tar.gz file has been packaged / checked out with wrong line endings (i.e. dos ones). If you try to run any of the .sh files you get “: invalid option” on OSX. you can fix this by running dos2unix on the files but their may be other issues because of this. Thanks, Justin

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC1*

Hi, > So solution is that the header should be copied from your [1] to [2] ? I think the best way to sort this would be to re-add the BSD header or a least a pointer to it in a comment and the BSD file to LICENSE. [1] Thanks, Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC1*

Hi, I’m seeing a number of failures: For version 4.16.0 / FP 23.0 - I though it could be a bad mirror? Installer version 3.3.0 (mac) Using Locale: en_AU Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI. SDK version Apache Flex SDK 4.16.0 AIR version 23.0 Flash Player version 23.0 Creating Apache

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC1*

Hi, A few other questions. Is there any reason the installer is defaulting to version 23 of AIR/Flash rather than a later version? Looks like the CONTRIBUTORS file was not updated. Is seem a little odd that the BSD licensed file here [1] has been copied into our repo with an ASF header. There

Re: [LAST CALL] Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1

Hi, > Is it not enough if that file has header with those license information ? It’s enough to satisfy the MIT license conditions but not quite enough for ASF policy. [1] Adding it to LICENSE also make it clear to any users that their’s MIT licensed software included without them looking for it

Re: [LAST CALL] Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1

Hi, I’ve not had a chance to look at this in full but a quick inspection shows that License is missing this MIT licensed file (copyright Dave Gandy). [1] Thanks, Justin 1. apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/flatspark/src/flatspark/utils/AwesomeUtils.as

Re: [LAST CALL] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3

Hi, I took a quick look and looks like there’s a couple of things that need to be fixed: - there are things bundled that perhaps should’t be i.e. ant_on_air/tests/temp - NOTICE has wrong year I’m currently travelling and may not be able to look at it again for several days. Thanks, Justin

Re: [LAST CALL] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3

Hi, > I don't understand. Under the link which I provided you don't see sources > packaged to zip? Sorry the link you provided was being unresponsive for me and I thought we also have a build on Apache’s build servers but was unable to find it. Thanks, Justin

Re: [LAST CALL] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3

Hi, Id there a source release anyway we can check I’m not seeing one at builds.apacge.org - but could of missed it. Thanks, Justin

Re: [Flex] Installer and fix for downloading an Adobe Air

Hi, > I'm working on fixing Apache Flex Installer. Josh provide me the bunch of > code where on windows for unpacking big Adobe Air SDK package I'm not using > cmd.exe, but powershell. It's working nicely - Adobe Air is being upcakged > without the errors. Unfortunately In the next step I'm gettin

Re: [3/4] git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/develop] - Allow drag and drop item renderers to be more that simpkle labels.

Hi, > Possibly. Which part adds overhead in your opinion? In that it a feature that not all users may use that's being implemented by conditional logic so it adds to both run time and possibly size cost. While that cost would be small in the past on the Flex list code similar to this has been

Re: [07/13] git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/release0.8.0] - give up on trying to use FlexBox for full-screen 3-pane views. FlexBox seems more happy stretching to content size instead of clipping a

Hi, > The compiler, the language, and the Flash runtime are all designed to > prevent you from making silly mistakes, so I think the best practice is t > define data classes. I've even considered adding a warning that detects > use of plain object. . Sonar Cube can do that for you - for instance

Re: [3/4] git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/develop] - Allow drag and drop item renderers to be more that simpkle labels.

Hi, This doesn’t look very PAYG to me. Wouldn’t the code be better off in another class? Thanks, Justin

Re: Royale Logo

Hi, Having the word apache in the logo is likely to help with branding and trademarks. See for example Apache Hadoop [1], Apache Spark [2], Apache Kafka [3] (and there are others as well i.e. cordova, storm, ant, solr, open office, geode + others and of course the http project). Apache Spark

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

Hi, > Spreadsheet with VOTES. Royale has a two points less, but still this is our > choose [1]. > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kOvPBUgkxcdIksEWOgKhzipy5EPR0eDz8JrlB2aDTCo/edit?usp=sharing So looks like there's 14 voters their not 13? Was Tom missed in the first count? The

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

Hi, > Even if we’re off by one, Royale is the clear winner. (I get 18 votes as > well.) I’m not seeing 18 votes for Royale would you mind listing them out. Thanks, Justin

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

Hi, I think you may need to double check the count. > Royale 18 > Limber (Limbr) 13 > Bead (Beads)11 > Braid 10 > Arise 9 > Bo

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

Hi, 1. Bead 2. Braid 3.Royale Thanks, Justin

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >