No objections from my side.
Chris
Gesendet mit meinem HTC
- Reply message -
Von: Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com
An: dev@flex.apache.org dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: [DISCUSS] [BlazeDS] Release of Apache BlazeDS 4.7.0.0 RC1
Datum: Mo., Mär. 2, 2015 08:22
Hi,
If it’s making you
Hi,
- I tagged the release RC1 cause it was the RC1 and I remember having trouble
deleting and re-adding a tag. If it's not a problem to delete a tag, I'd be
glad to change this.
No issue with the tag in git, it's the fact that it part of the release that's
an issue. The pom.xml in the
...@classsoftware.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 1. März 2015 08:13
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] [BlazeDS] Release of Apache BlazeDS 4.7.0.0 RC1
Hi,
One thing I did noticed about the code is the large number of @author tags.
This is generally frowned on in Apache. [1][2] Should we remove them?
Thanks
-tools-api we also didnt append the apache ... what do the others
think?
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 1. März 2015 11:09
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] [BlazeDS] Release of Apache BlazeDS 4.7.0.0 RC1
Hi,
Thinking about it again I think we don't need the apache in front of the
artifact as it's allready part of the groupId.
I was referring to the name of the of the source zip file. Having apache in the
name gives a little more legal protection, but it's not a requirement.
Justin
On 2/28/15, 11:12 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
One thing I did noticed about the code is the large number of @author
tags. This is generally frowned on in Apache. [1][2] Should we remove
them?
If it’s making you itch, go ahead and scratch it.
-Alex
Hi,
If it’s making you itch, go ahead and scratch it.
Anyone else have any objections to removing them? If not and once I have time
I'll remove them.
Thanks,
Justin
Nachricht-
Von: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 1. März 2015 15:20
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] [BlazeDS] Release of Apache BlazeDS 4.7.0.0 RC1
Hi,
Thinking about it again I think we don't need the apache in front of the
artifact as it's
HI,
I taken a look and there's possibly an issue, while very minor, may require
another RC being made. :-(
The pom file containing a tag containing RC1. This is included in the release
artefact and can't be change without changing the hashes/resigning etc
tagblazeds-4.7.0.0-RC1/tag
Thanks,
Hi,
When reviewing I also noticed these two files:
./proxy/src/flex/messaging/services/http/httpclient/EasySSLProtocolSocketFactory.java
./proxy/src/flex/messaging/services/http/httpclient/EasyX509TrustManager.java
I believe both are form the Apache Jakarta project so there no issue re
Hi,
One thing I did noticed about the code is the large number of @author tags.
This is generally frowned on in Apache. [1][2] Should we remove them?
Thanks,
Justin
1.
http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2004/board_minutes_2004_09_22.txt
(read 7F)
2
@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] [BlazeDS] Release of Apache BlazeDS 4.7.0.0 RC1
Are there any quick and easy example projects to test it with ?
Tom
On 27/02/15 09:24, Christofer Dutz wrote:
Hi,
this is the discussion thread to the matching vote. Please place any
discussions here
Hi,
this is the discussion thread to the matching vote. Please place any
discussions here.
Chris
Are there any quick and easy example projects to test it with ?
Tom
On 27/02/15 09:24, Christofer Dutz wrote:
Hi,
this is the discussion thread to the matching vote. Please place any
discussions here.
Chris
__
This email
14 matches
Mail list logo
