No objections from my side.
Chris
Gesendet mit meinem HTC
- Reply message -
Von: "Justin Mclean"
An: "dev@flex.apache.org"
Betreff: [DISCUSS] [BlazeDS] Release of Apache BlazeDS 4.7.0.0 RC1
Datum: Mo., Mär. 2, 2015 08:22
Hi,
> If it’s making you itch,
Hi,
> If it’s making you itch, go ahead and scratch it.
Anyone else have any objections to removing them? If not and once I have time
I'll remove them.
Thanks,
Justin
On 2/28/15, 11:12 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>One thing I did noticed about the code is the large number of @author
>tags. This is generally frowned on in Apache. [1][2] Should we remove
>them?
If it’s making you itch, go ahead and scratch it.
-Alex
liche Nachricht-
Von: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 1. März 2015 15:20
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] [BlazeDS] Release of Apache BlazeDS 4.7.0.0 RC1
Hi,
> Thinking about it again I think we don't need the "apache" in front of
Hi,
> Thinking about it again I think we don't need the "apache" in front of the
> artifact as it's allready part of the groupId.
I was referring to the name of the of the source zip file. Having apache in the
name gives a little more legal protection, but it's not a requirement.
Justin
tifact name again ... and with
the flex-tools-api we also didnt append the "apache" ... what do the others
think?
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 1. März 2015 11:09
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re:
Hi,
> - I tagged the release RC1 cause it was the RC1 and I remember having trouble
> deleting and re-adding a tag. If it's not a problem to delete a tag, I'd be
> glad to change this.
No issue with the tag in git, it's the fact that it part of the release that's
an issue. The pom.xml in the r
tuff.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 1. März 2015 08:13
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] [BlazeDS] Release of Apache BlazeDS 4.7.0.0 RC1
Hi,
One thing I did noticed about the code is the large number of @au
Hi,
One thing I did noticed about the code is the large number of @author tags.
This is generally frowned on in Apache. [1][2] Should we remove them?
Thanks,
Justin
1.
http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2004/board_minutes_2004_09_22.txt
(read 7F)
2 http://opensource.com/law/14/2
Hi,
When reviewing I also noticed these two files:
./proxy/src/flex/messaging/services/http/httpclient/EasySSLProtocolSocketFactory.java
./proxy/src/flex/messaging/services/http/httpclient/EasyX509TrustManager.java
I believe both are form the Apache Jakarta project so there no issue re
LICENSE/N
HI,
I taken a look and there's possibly an issue, while very minor, may require
another RC being made. :-(
The pom file containing a tag containing RC1. This is included in the release
artefact and can't be change without changing the hashes/resigning etc
blazeds-4.7.0.0-RC1
Thanks,
Justin
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] [BlazeDS] Release of Apache BlazeDS 4.7.0.0 RC1
Are there any quick and easy example projects to test it with ?
Tom
On 27/02/15 09:24, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> this is the discussion thread to the matching vote. Please place any
> discussions he
Are there any quick and easy example projects to test it with ?
Tom
On 27/02/15 09:24, Christofer Dutz wrote:
Hi,
this is the discussion thread to the matching vote. Please place any
discussions here.
Chris
__
This email
Hi,
this is the discussion thread to the matching vote. Please place any
discussions here.
Chris
14 matches
Mail list logo
