] Discuss Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.1 RC1
Hi,
I think compiler/commandline isn't intended to work from that folder. It
gets copied into the SDK.
Even if it does It will still have the newline issue and this should be pointed
out in the README or RELEASE_NOTES. I certainly expected them to work
I agree. As long as the release is properly marked as Alpha quality and
with a version number that indicates the same - 0.01 will do ;-) - everyone
will know to not rely on this for major mission critical enterprise
applications.
I'll get on testing as soon as I get these pesky clients off my
Hi,
I think at the very least we need to state that it is alpha software [1], for
use by bleeding-edge developers and list what doesn't work in the RELEASE_NOTES.
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#release-types
HI,
Falcon is only a compiler. It copies the Flex SDKs debugger (FDB) in
order to provide the equivalent functionality.
Seems a big dependancy to have just for the debugger. As Flex is Apache license
could be grab the binary and take the few files(?) we need from that? Not that
I think this
Hi,
This is a frequent puzzle for me with Ant. Sometimes Ant is able to
create the chain of missing folders and sometimes it won't.
Managed to get further with:
mkdir -p
/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlexFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.0.1-src/compiler/generated/dist/sdk/bin
mkdir -p
. April 2014 10:32
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.1 RC1
HI,
Falcon is only a compiler. It copies the Flex SDKs debugger (FDB) in
order to provide the equivalent functionality.
Seems a big dependancy to have just for the debugger. As Flex
HI,
OK made it a bit further but think we have some issues.
In in compiler/commandline both mxmlc and compc give errors if you try and run
them which looks like a windows new line issue.
Even when I fix that I get this:
Using Flex SDK: /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.12released/
I think compiler/commandline isn't intended to work from that folder. It
gets copied into the SDK.
It's a good question as to how self-sufficient this kit needs to be when
it is really intended as an upstream distribution for FlexJS. IMO, this
kit is successful when its build script runs
Hi,
I think compiler/commandline isn't intended to work from that folder. It
gets copied into the SDK.
Even if it does It will still have the newline issue and this should be pointed
out in the README or RELEASE_NOTES. I certainly expected them to work.
It's a good question as to how
Everything you pointed out is a valid issue. The question is whether it
is a blocker for a 0.0.1 release. IMO, if the two packages can build
working examples and the binary kits can be installed and work in FB that
is good enough for this initial release.
-Alex
On 4/13/14 9:34 PM, Justin
Hi,
What the deal with having to manually set up JFLEX? As far as I can see JFLEX
is under a BSD license - see http://jflex.de/copying.html.
Currently I'm not able to build FalconFX. I assume it's probably something I've
done wrong but no idea what - anyone have any ideas?
Buildfile:
Hi,
I'm also a little confused to why the Flex SDK is required as a prerequisite
for Falcon. Can anyone explain why?
Thank,
Justin
On 4/12/14 4:07 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm also a little confused to why the Flex SDK is required as a
prerequisite for Falcon. Can anyone explain why?
Falcon is only a compiler. It copies the Flex SDKs debugger (FDB) in
order to provide the equivalent
On 4/12/14 3:57 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
What the deal with having to manually set up JFLEX? As far as I can see
JFLEX is under a BSD license - see http://jflex.de/copying.html.
Ah cool. Thanks for seeing that. I've been using 1.4 since the donation.
Looks like
Please place all discussion in this thread.
Thanks,
-Alex
15 matches
Mail list logo
