@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Dart] - playing around
On 2/2/13 3:02 PM, Frank Pepermans frankp...@hotmail.com wrote:
Dart as a language may be more accessible to non-Flex coders,
if it really kicks off that is.
That's the main reason I stayed with plain old JavaScript. It isn't clear
to me that Dart
, and switch to swf for older ones.
Might be less of a nightmare to support?
@Christophe, looking nice already, I love the web UI myself, looking forward to
dig in some more
Subject: RE: [Dart] - playing around
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 07:33:16 -0500
From: mark.kessler@usmc.mil
To: dev
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
Dart is supported only on IE9+
I can understand this decision. Implementing high-level language features
in a JS version that does not even allow get/set functions or
non-enumerable custom properties really is a pain.
But to be
I've been playing around with Dart for a day,
been doing a huge Flex project for 2 years, but the next one will have to be
HTML,
so I decided to give it a good look, as I always do, by developing a small
project.
I chose to try and build a very small Flex-like framework and see how far I
could
);
-Original Message-
From: Nick Tsitlakidis
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 7:49 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Dart] - playing around
I've been also checking out Dart lately. And I decided to do so after
discovering this : http://www.dartflash.com/
Based on dartflash I
features (factory, future, overloading, ...).
Those can all be added via Falcon of course.
-Original Message-
From: Frank Wienberg
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 11:53 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Dart] - playing around
Something like dartflash is also available
To be honest, I didnt know about JooFlash.
The reason why I started messing around with Dart is because I wanted to
see how it works and I was looking for a language which is similar to AS3.
Dart is similar in many parts of it and dartflash made it even more.
I think that it doesn't have a
On 2/2/13 3:02 PM, Frank Pepermans frankp...@hotmail.com wrote:
Dart as a language may be more accessible to non-Flex coders,
if it really kicks off that is.
That's the main reason I stayed with plain old JavaScript. It isn't clear
to me that Dart will run in the places we need it to run,
Well Dart compiles to JavaScript. So it will work there too
On Feb 3, 2013 5:58 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 2/2/13 3:02 PM, Frank Pepermans frankp...@hotmail.com wrote:
Dart as a language may be more accessible to non-Flex coders,
if it really kicks off that is.
That's the
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 2/2/13 9:06 PM, Alain Ekambi jazzmatad...@gmail.com wrote:
Well Dart compiles to JavaScript. So it will work there too
Hmm. Maybe there's FUD out there then. Like this:
10 matches
Mail list logo