Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

2017-09-05 Thread Carlos Rovira
That was the problem I have the test working! :)[image: Imágenes integradas 2] 2017-09-05 20:18 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > Hi Carlos, > > Try switching flex-falcon to the develop branch. I think the RemoteClass > handling is in the develop branch and not feature/amf. > >

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

2017-09-05 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Carlos, Try switching flex-falcon to the develop branch. I think the RemoteClass handling is in the develop branch and not feature/amf. -Alex On 9/5/17, 10:56 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >Hi

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

2017-09-05 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex, thanks, I know start to remember. That two scaffold projects was created by me in February and I left it incomplete and created based on PKumar and Chris Dutz help. Is great that you get it to work! :) Know I'm trying to build with maven, so I put all 3 repos in brach "feature/amf",

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

2017-09-04 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Carlos, Yes, if you look at the commits in that branch, there is a server example in examples/amf/SampleAmfWebApp that has a ServerCustomObject.java. In examples/flexjs/RemoteObjectAmfTest there is a ClientCustomObject.java with [RemoteClass] metadata that references the qualified name of

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

2017-09-04 Thread Carlos Rovira
ok, I know see this is in "feature/amf" Thanks! :) 2017-09-05 1:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira : > Hi Alex, > > could you provide more about your work here? > > For what you said I could infer that the work on AMF is on a branch or > feature branch? could you provide

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

2017-09-04 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex, could you provide more about your work here? For what you said I could infer that the work on AMF is on a branch or feature branch? could you provide what branch is? And the work right now makes a successful communication with a test java backend to send and receive a String and an

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

2017-09-04 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Folks, I just pushed changes that prove that I can get an array of custom objects from the backend. So, I'm going to declare my effort on AMF complete for now and go do other things. Feel free to suggest what those other things are. There is no AsyncToken API right now, so if folks have to

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

2017-09-03 Thread Jose Barragan
Hi Alex, Greg, Sounds great!! AMF always was my preference option for communicate the JS frontend with the backend, as I always doing with Flex, but I haven't been cant found any good implementation for use it. Sincerely, I think that a good AMF protocol implemetation (AsynToken,

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

2017-09-03 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Carlos, Any commit from was always a pleasure to read. :) I'm watching AMF progress also and happy that something is moving. I hope that we will get mature enough to get avant2 to FlexJS. I can say that with MDL there is been achieved quite a lot in some app which I helped and I think we have a

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

2017-09-03 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex, Greg, great to see some effort on bringing AMF/RemoteObject Support to FlexJS. Always say that this was *key* to success. Need to say that I just commented with some people about this and as I expected that brings lots of interest, since people see this as a way to only redo the front in

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

2017-09-02 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Greg, I didn't even realize the old thread was on users@ so thanks for moving it here. I'm sure there are lots of improvements needed to make this work in the general case so thanks for noticing and offering to help out. I wondered for a bit whether there already was a "collect the

[FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

2017-09-01 Thread Greg Dove
Hi Alex, Nice to see this stuff progressing within the framework itself. I moved this comment to dev because of content below, and I will try to take a look at this, to see if I can also test things in the coming week. I quickly looked at some of the commits, perhaps I have missed something and