If the Maven build is done in the next week or two, I think we should wait. If
it’ll be longer than that, I think we should try and get the current version
out the door.
On Jun 6, 2016, at 9:15 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>> I think we should get 0.7 out.
>
> I keep hoping Chris will report
On 6/6/16, 5:57 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I wouldn’t say that 0.7.0 is all about Maven. It has quite a few odds and
>ends fixes, XML, Typed Node.js, etc.
True, sorry if I offended anyone by leaving their work unmentioned. But
from my perspective, I don't think we've worked on what Carlos is looking
I wouldn’t say that 0.7.0 is all about Maven. It has quite a few odds and ends
fixes, XML, Typed Node.js, etc.
I think we should get 0.7 out.
On Jun 6, 2016, at 12:26 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 6/5/16, 2:02 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
> wrote:
>
>> Right,
>
On 6/5/16, 2:02 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Right,
>
>the problem right now, at least for me, is the same that I pointed some
>months ago: Code unstable to test and play for users not following the
>changes or very involved in FlexJS.
>I think this is a coju
Right,
the problem right now, at least for me, is the same that I pointed some
months ago: Code unstable to test and play for users not following the
changes or very involved in FlexJS.
I think this is a cojuntural problem and soon would be overpassed. I was
waiting for 0.7 release to try again. I
I agree with Carlos. If the framework side of FlexJS is to be successful,
it needs a robust and opinionated "main" set of UI components (even if the
SDK also means to be flexible and support other JS component sets). That
was one of the biggest selling points of the old Flex SDK, and that's what
de
On 6/4/16, 1:06 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>2016-06-03 22:13 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>
>>
>> I'm interested in what Carlos and others would expect from FlexJS in
>>order
>> to be a "better way" of developing web apps.
>>
>
>I think FlexJS is getting lots of c
2016-06-03 22:13 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>
> I'm interested in what Carlos and others would expect from FlexJS in order
> to be a "better way" of developing web apps.
>
I think FlexJS is getting lots of cool stuff that make it *potentially*
very flexible, but thinking as a user (or
someone that wo
You can use React in TypeScript with the type definitions here:
https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/tree/master/react
My team is using React in TSX which references AS libraries typed with
as2dts. For my work, the major advantage AS has over TS is the is/as
operators which can check
Yes, exactly. Using ActionScript with a hot new framework like React would
be really compelling, in my opinion.
Interestingly, React lets you use ES6 classes as long as you extend
React.Component. Here's an example from the React docs:
class HelloMessage extends React.Component {
render() {
That's interesting. So essentially, you could replace all the JS in the
ReactJS examples with AS?
I still think there are more productivity gains beyond that for ReactJS.
Anytime I look at these framework APIs using a lot of {} objects, that is
ripe for a more strongly-typed API surface.
-Alex
I had an idea recently that I haven't looked into too deeply, so it might
turn out that it isn't feasible. However, I'd like to try adding an
optional flag to make the compiler interpret XML literals in ActionScript
as JSX instead (obviously, you'd no longer be able to use XML literals for
their or
On 6/3/16, 11:39 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
>Thanks for checking out the article. Alex Harui is working on such a
>thing. Perhaps when he has a moment he can fill us in on the details.
Well, I'm trying to see if we can run MX and Spark on top of FlexJS, but
it is going to be fat and slow because F
Thanks for checking out the article. Alex Harui is working on such a
thing. Perhaps when he has a moment he can fill us in on the details.
‹peter
On 6/3/16, 2:35 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Hi Peter,
>
>very interesting read. These days ReactJS seems to be t
Hi Peter,
very interesting read. These days ReactJS seems to be the V library with
most traction on the web (overpassing AngularJS 2 and others). I thought
you integrated React in FlexJS but as I read I saw is really a comparision
and not an integration like the one with CreateJS. Very useful to s
Hi,
FlexJS has a couple of non-Flash component libraries now, CreateJS and jQuery,
along with integration with Apache Cordova. This got me thinking about ReactJS.
I did a little investigation to see how it might fit with FlexJS and I wrote a
brief page about[1]. My opinion is that ReactJS, espe
16 matches
Mail list logo
