Well, apparently we are not allowed to use committers@ to try to get
committers to submit talks for the client track, even though the CFP went
out on committers@. I will try dev@community.a.o next.
-Alex
On 2/4/16, 10:10 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>OK, heard back from Cordova. They have 3 talk
OK, heard back from Cordova. They have 3 talk proposals. I think I'll
try committers@ mailing list to see if other projects are interested.
-Alex
On 2/3/16, 9:46 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>On 2/3/16, 5:34 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
>
>>
>>In any case,
> In other words, AS3 is always in "use strict" mode!
And that's a good thing !
:P
-Mark
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Have you tried -compiler.strict=false?
Or window.var2 = "world"
-Alex
On 2/3/16, 6:32 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>Okay, you can't do this in AS3 :-)
>
>function foo()
>{
> var var1 = "hello";
> var2 = "world"; // global variable
>}
>
>In other words, AS3
On 2/3/16, 5:34 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>
>In any case, any updates on the Client Track? Is there a discussion going
>on somewhere?
Haven't heard back from the Cordova person to ensure they are on board. I
guess I'll ping him in the morning then open t
Okay, you can't do this in AS3 :-)
function foo()
{
var var1 = "hello";
var2 = "world"; // global variable
}
In other words, AS3 is always in "use strict" mode!
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote:
> Can't you?
>
> package
> {
> public var globalVar:String = "global";
>
Can't you?
package
{
public var globalVar:String = "global";
}
- Josh
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 6:34 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 2/1/16, 11:17 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala"
> > wrote:
> >
>
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 2/1/16, 11:17 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >
> >> 12 days to go. I pinged the Cordova person this morning. I think it
> >> might be time to
On 2/1/16, 11:17 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> 12 days to go. I pinged the Cordova person this morning. I think it
>> might be time to send an email to committers@ to see if there is more
>> interest in
gt; >to jump in) In this approach you have a good chance of your talk included
> >as well.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Om
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> >> Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha..
(and any other Apache 'Client' projects that decide
>to jump in) In this approach you have a good chance of your talk included
>as well.
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha.
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [ApacheCon NA] Whose going and what topics?
>
>
>
> On 1/9/16, 2:03 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
> >+1
> >
> >Would the FlexJS/Flex & Maven talk fit to that? I think it would.
> >
>
>
But a cordova track would exclude my planned IoT + Mobile + Flex talk as it
currently relies on Flex
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Samstag, 9. Januar 2016 16:26
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [ApacheCon NA] Whose going
Well, the public snippets would be things like:
ApacheCon continues to feel like more of a server-side conference and we
don't get much attendance at our talks.
And
Apparently it helps to have a track of presentations in order to get a
presentation accepted and I'm wondering if it would be of in
Sure, I can contact them. Can you forward the details you sent to the
Cordova team member? If that is not for public consumption, I can write a
new email to the Wicket folks.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 1/19/16, 12:44 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf
On 1/19/16, 12:44 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>On Jan 19, 2016 10:58 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>>
>> OK, I finally got a response from a Cordova person. They are interested
>> in the client-side track idea. Once they get approval from their dev
>> list, we s
On Jan 19, 2016 10:58 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
> OK, I finally got a response from a Cordova person. They are interested
> in the client-side track idea. Once they get approval from their dev
> list, we should submit talks and do more coordination. I think instead of
> cross posting to both de
OK, I finally got a response from a Cordova person. They are interested
in the client-side track idea. Once they get approval from their dev
list, we should submit talks and do more coordination. I think instead of
cross posting to both dev@ lists, maybe we should try the wider
dev@community.a.o
On 1/9/16, 2:03 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>+1
>
>Would the FlexJS/Flex & Maven talk fit to that? I think it would.
>
Yes, because it is about integrating your client build environment with
the rest of your builds, right?
I will ping some Cordova people this weekend or next week.
-Alex
+1
Would the FlexJS/Flex & Maven talk fit to that? I think it would.
Chris
Von: omup...@gmail.com im Auftrag von OmPrakash Muppirala
Gesendet: Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 18:36
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [ApacheCon NA] Whose going and what
20 matches
Mail list logo
